quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

But hey, if that goes for interesting in your world, have at it.

Well thank you, Polite. That's damn decent of you. Turning over a new leaf?

K.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I havent missed any point, as you clearly never made one.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I havent missed any point, as you clearly never made one.

I did but as usual you were to busy throwing out juvenile insults to read what I actually wrote. But maybe I am wrong. I suppose it's possible that you and peon both think there should be a discussion on a bill to ban hand guns. I mean just because the law already exists there's no reason not to bring up the subject at commons and spend days going over it. After all you don't have anything else to do right? Maybe while you are at it, you could get them to debate driving on the left. Something else you already do but still a fun subject and since the intent isn't to change any laws it's all good. Now don't disappoint, I expect you to totally misread this and come back with more vague insults, k. perhaps make reference to another of your posts that have nothing to do with my original comment to P.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I havent missed any point, as you clearly never made one.

I did but as usual you were to busy throwing out juvenile insults to read what I actually wrote. But maybe I am wrong. I suppose it's possible that you and peon both think there should be a discussion on a bill to ban hand guns. I mean just because the law already exists there's no reason not to bring up the subject at commons and spend days going over it. After all you don't have anything else to do right? Maybe while you are at it, you could get them to debate driving on the left. Something else you already do but still a fun subject and since the intent isn't to change any laws it's all good. Now don't disappoint, I expect you to totally misread this and come back with more vague insults, k. perhaps make reference to another of your posts that have nothing to do with my original comment to P.

I still can't quite grasp what your point is on this, THB. Honestly, I'm genuinely a bit mystified. I can't speak for PS but as far as I'm concerned there's no need for a bill on handguns to go before the Commons. There's no appreciable desire in the country for the subject to be looked at again, despite the finding of that weird little survey in The Telegraph. It's done and dusted.

quote:

THB
Why would you need to introduce a bill to ban hand guns if they are already banned? Don't you folks have enough shit to work on without redoing your own laws. Now I understand that you were really keen to tick such a box but it seems like a real waste of time from over here. They asked what you wanted to see discussed in the commons, and that makes it sound like they are looking for real issues.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

THB, Peon also gets it, you have no point, none, zilch, nada, niet, rien.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

THB, Peon also gets it, you have no point, none, zilch, nada, niet, rien.

That's odd because according to peon in the post I replied to where he said "I still can't quite grasp what your point is on this" he doesn't. I then tried to explain it to him. It's called communication. You might want to try it if you ever tire of being such an arrogant fucking troll.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
Considering that the second leading cause of death of children and young men an women in this country is firearms I am not sure a reduction of crime, that could be from other factors rather than guns, is worth their deaths.