DaddySatyr
Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011 From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky Status: offline
|
In an interview, today, the guy that wrote Clinton's 1993 federal RFRA law said that there is no appreciable difference between his law and the Indiana law. I forgot his last name. His first name is "Mike" (ETA: Michael Ferris or Farris) I think something else bears repeating, also: quote:
We all have a shared desire, here to protect perhaps the most precious of all American liberties: Religious freedom. Usually, the signing of legislation by a president is a ministerial act; often, a quiet ending to a turbulent legislative process. Today, this event assumes a more majestic quality because of our ability together to affirm the historic role that people of faith have played in the history of this country and the constitutional protections those who profess and express their faith have always demanded and cherished. The power to reverse legislation … by legislation, a decision of the United States Supreme Court is a power that is rightly … hesitantly and infrequently exercised by the United States Congress but this is an issue in which that extreme measure was clearly called for. As the Vice President said, this act reverses the Supreme Court's decision, “Employment Division Against Smith” and re-establishes a standard that better protects all Americans of all faiths in the exercise of their religion in a way that, I am convinced, is far more consistent with the intent of the founders of this nation than the Supreme Court decision. More than fifty cases have been decided against individuals making religious claims against government action since that decision was handed down. This act will help to reverse that trend by honoring the principle that our laws and institutions should not impede or hinder but rather should protect and preserve fundamental religious liberties. The free exercise of religion has been called: “the first freedom”; that which originally sparked the development of the full range of the Bill of Rights. Our founders cared a lot about religion and one of the reasons they worked so hard to get the first amendment into the Bill of Rights, at the head of the class, is that they well understood what could happen to this country; how both religion and government could be perverted if their were not some space created and some protection provided. They knew that religion helps to give our people a character without which a democracy cannot survive. They knew that there needed to be a space … a freedom between government and people of faith that otherwise, government might usurp. They have seen, now, all of us that religion and religious institutions have brought forth faith and discipline, community and responsibility over to centuries for ourselves and enabled us to live together in ways that, I believe, would not have been possible. We are, after all, the oldest democracy, now, in history and probably the most truly multi-ethnic society on the face of the earth and I am convinced that neither one of those things would be true, today had it not been for the importance of the first amendment and the fact that we have kept faith with it for two hundred years. Our citizens … (interruption by applause) What this law basically says is that the government should be held to a very high level of proof before it interferes with someone's free exercise of religion. This judgment is shared by the people of the United States as well as by the congress. We believe, strongly, that we can never … we can never be too vigilant in this work. Let me make one other comment, if I might, before I close and sit down and sign this bill: There is a great debate, now, abroad in the land which finds itself into … injected into several political races about the extent to which people of faith can seek to do God's will as political actors. I would like to come down on the side of encouraging everybody to act on what they believe is the right thing to do. There are many people in this country who strenuously disagree with me on what they believe are the strongest grounds of their faith. I encourage them to speak out. I encourage all Americans to reach deep inside to try to determine what it is that drives their lives, most deeply. As many of you know, I have been quite moved by Stephen Carter's book: “The Culture of Disbelief”. He makes a compelling case that today, Americans of all political persuasions and all regents have created a climate in this country in which some people believe uh that they are embarrassed to say that they advocate a course of action simply because they believe it is the right thing to do because they believe it is dictated by their faith by what they discern to be, with their best efforts, the will of God. I submit to you, today, my fellow Americans, that we can stand that kind of debate in this country. We are living in a country where the most central institution of our society, the family, has been under assault for thirty years. We are living in a country in which a hundred and sixty thousand school children don't go to school, every day because they're afraid someone will shoot them or beat them up or not knife them. We are living in a country, now, where gunshots are the single leading cause of death among teen-aged boys. We are living in a country where people can find themselves shot in the crossfire of teen-agers who are often better armed than the police, who are trying to protect other people from illegal conduct. It is high time we had an open and honest re-affirmation of the role of American citizens of faith; not so that we can agree but so that we can argue and discourse and seek the truth and seek to heal this troubled land. So, today, I ask you to also think of that. We are a people of faith. We have been so secure in that faith that we have enshrined in our constitution protections for people who profess no faith and good for us for doing so. That is what the first amendment is all about, but let us never believe that the freedom of religion imposes on any of us some responsibility to run from our convictions. Let us, instead, respect one anothers' faiths, fight, to the death, to preserve the right of every American to practice whatever convictions he or she has but bring our values back to the tables of American discourse to heal our troubled land. Thank you, very much. (Applause) William Jefferson Clinton 16 NOV, 1993 right before signing the federal RFRA Let me repeat a part of that, with emphasis: quote:
We are a people of faith. We have been so secure in that faith that we have enshrined in our constitution protections for people who profess no faith and good for us for doing so. That is what the first amendment is all about, but let us never believe that the freedom of religion imposes on any of us some responsibility to run from our convictions. Let us, instead, respect one anothers' faiths, fight, to the death, to preserve the right of every American to practice whatever convictions he or she has but bring our values back to the tables of American discourse to heal our troubled land. Michael
< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 3/31/2015 10:04:11 PM >
_____________________________
A Stone in My Shoe Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me? "For that which I love, I will do horrible things"
|