Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/22/2015 2:40:58 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Oh FFS, read the words that YOU wrote and I bolded a few posts back. They are clear enough for all to see.

Actually, that was quote. Reading skills, yanno?


Stop being immature and childish.

Politesub clearly understands things. You can try your typical tactics again and again; but many of us have learn from them. That out flanking your positions has become to easy of late.

You typically evade direct questions, while demanding others answer yours. THAT, is being a hypocrite. You typically attack the individual when they make good points and back it up with air-tight arguments. In this exchange, Politesub "fucking PWNED your ass" to use a gamer expression!

Be a gentleman and admit defeat. You can do that, right?

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/22/2015 2:48:42 PM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline
You all know the National Report is a satire site... right?

_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/24/2015 4:12:29 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
And you still dont get the what a fucking bonus is.


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/24/2015 4:32:14 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge

You all know the National Report is a satire site... right?

OOps I stated that wrong:) by bad, apologies Crazyml.
It was a play off another "source" given in another thread.
like the onion, blackcurrant, etcetc


< Message edited by Lucylastic -- 4/24/2015 4:47:44 PM >


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/24/2015 4:35:23 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3672
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge

You all know the National Report is a satire site... right?


Slow news week. We're just making shit up to fight about now. Pretty sure it's your turn.

(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/30/2015 10:42:46 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

FR

Theyre already cheating

quote:

Exclusive: Britain told U.N. monitors of active Iran nuclear procurement - panel

(Reuters) - Britain has informed a United Nations sanctions panel of an active Iranian nuclear procurement network linked to two blacklisted firms, according to a confidential report by the panel seen by Reuters.

The existence of such a network could add to Western concerns over whether Tehran can be trusted to adhere to a nuclear deal due by June 30 in which it would agree to restrict sensitive nuclear work in exchange for sanctions relief.

Talks between six major powers and Tehran are approaching the final stages after they hammered out a preliminary agreement on April 2, with Iran committing to reduce the number of centrifuges it operates and other long-term nuclear limitations.

"The UK government informed the Panel on 20 April 2015 that it 'is aware of an active Iranian nuclear procurement network which has been associated with Iran's Centrifuge Technology Company (TESA) and Kalay Electric Company (KEC)'," the Panel of Experts said in its annual report. The panel monitors Iran's compliance with the U.N. sanctions regime.

KEC is under U.N. Security Council sanctions while TESA is under U.S. and European Union sanctions due to their suspected links to banned Iranian nuclear activities.

Iran, which is has been under sanctions for years, has a long history of illicit nuclear procurement using front companies and other methods of skirting sanctions.

That has enabled it to develop a substantial atomic program in spite of aggressive international efforts to curtail it, U.N. diplomats say. But analysts and Western intelligence officials say sanctions have slowed the development of Tehran’s nuclear program.

The United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency have repeatedly said that Tehran has so far complied with the terms of a limited agreement struck in November 2013 between Iran and the six powers involving some reductions in its nuclear activities, including enrichment...





_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/30/2015 10:50:14 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
They are not cheating, nothing has been signed.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/30/2015 11:13:29 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

They are not cheating, nothing has been signed.


Theyre not negotiating in good faith, or put another way their actions run contrary to their words



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/30/2015 11:18:08 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
What do you mean they are not negotiating in good faith? Your heros the quislings of america have already told them that we are not negotiating in good faith, and when you come to power (never) you will void it.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/30/2015 11:26:38 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

What do you mean they are not negotiating in good faith? Your heros the quislings of america have already told them that we are not negotiating in good faith, and when you come to power (never) you will void it.


What do I mean... They are not negotiating in good faith

My apologies, but I do not have the patience to break it down any further for you

As for Congress, whose constitutional duty includes the ratification of any treaty, they simply advised Iran that John Kerry is an utter moron who out if his vast ignorance of how the United States is governed, was not negotiating in good faith


Perhaps well intentioned, but an idiot (just like the president).

Hardly the same thing. Not even remotely a good point


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/30/2015 11:39:16 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
But mine is true, yours as always is lying untutored slobbering.

Not even close to a point.

The United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency have repeatedly said that Tehran has so far complied with the terms of a limited agreement struck in November 2013 between Iran and the six powers involving some reductions in its nuclear activities, including enrichment

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/30/2015 4:42:45 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

They are not cheating, nothing has been signed.


Theyre not negotiating in good faith, or put another way their actions run contrary to their words




The event sanity speaks of is from a year ago, he should really check his facts. That hardly comes under current negotiations.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/30/2015 5:12:10 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Exclusive - Britain told UN monitors of active Iran nuclear procurement: panel
Reuters‎ - 22 mins ago

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0NL09220150430

The article is dated today

(How does it feel, to be wrong about everything that you post?)

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/30/2015 5:57:30 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Something else thats NEWS: Even more evidence that Iran cannot be trusted

quote:

First on CNN: Navy to escort U.S. commercial ships near Iran

Washington (CNN)CNN has learned that U.S. Navy warships will now accompany U.S.-flagged commercial vessels that pass through the Strait of Hormuz due to concerns that ships from Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps navy could try to seize a U.S. cargo ship.

Pentagon officials provided clarification Thursday afternoon that not every ship will necessarily be accompanied by the Navy. But this is still a significant change in the U.S. military posture in the Strait.

The classified plan was approved by the Pentagon earlier Thursday, according to a senior defense official.

While the Navy maintains a routine ship presence in the Persian Gulf and the North Arabian Sea, this new effort specifically requires an armed warship to be in the narrow channel between Iran and Oman when a U.S. commercial vessel passes through.

The decision to go ahead with this plan comes as Iran Revolutionary Guard ships harassed a U.S.-flagged vessel, the Maersk Kensington, on Friday and then later seized another cargo ship, the Maersk Tigris, flagged in the Marshall Islands...

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/30/politics/us-navy-escort-cargo-ships-iran-strait-of-hormuz/index.html


I wonder who is in worse denial. John Kerry and the rest of the Obama administration? or our resident Islamist apologists...


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 4/30/2015 7:14:52 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2399
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Next Obama will be sending them lingerie.

Nah, he'll let them pick out the lingerie they like.

The State Department on Monday would not rule out giving Iran up to $50 billion as a so-called "signing bonus" for agreeing to a nuclear deal later this year, according to comments made to journalists following reports that the Obama administration had formulated a plan to release tens of billions of frozen Iranian funds. Experts have said this multi-billion dollar "signing bonus" option, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, could be the largest cash infusion to a terror-backing regime in recent memory. ~Source

K.




Actually the biggest cash infusion to a terror-backing regime in recent memory, was (and is) the invasion of Iraq, which saved this same terror-backing regime approximately $4Billion/yr (we are on year 12 and counting) in defense spending in it's conflict with Iraq, which was diverted into their nuclear program. (Not to mention the development of this same terror-backing regime's Pars gas field, earning (I don't know how much)).

Oh and BTW: The same American company who developed this gas field FOR this terror-backing regime, DIRECTLY sold this same regime technology for uranium enrichment.


Just sayin'

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 5/1/2015 4:29:03 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Exclusive - Britain told UN monitors of active Iran nuclear procurement: panel
Reuters‎ - 22 mins ago

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0NL09220150430

The article is dated today

(How does it feel, to be wrong about everything that you post?)



Get a fucking grip and do some research. the report may be new but the incident was from a year ago. Only one of us is happy to post outdated bullshit and claim it as being right. (And it aint me bruv)

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 5/1/2015 6:24:38 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
"The UK government informed the Panel on 20 April 2015 that it 'is aware of an active Iranian nuclear procurement network which has been associated with Iran's Centrifuge Technology Company (TESA) and Kalay Electric Company (KEC)'," the Panel of Experts said in its annual report. The panel monitors Iran's compliance with the U.N. sanctions regime.

And


The panel also said that a U.N.-sanctioned subsidiary of the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), the Irano Hind Shipping Company (IHSC), has remained active without its assets being frozen as required under U.N. sanctions rules.

The report said IHSC continues to operate two oil tankers, Amin 2 and Tour 2, which have been transporting crude oil to Syria, as recently as after September 2014.

```````


Neither of those look like a year ago.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 5/1/2015 6:42:16 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Britain has informed the United Nations Iranian of attempts a year ago to buy uranium enrichment technology on the black market, it was reported on Thursday. source http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/30/uk-tells-un-of-iranian-attempts-to-buy-nuclear-technology-report


Like I said..... a year ago.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 5/1/2015 7:22:10 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
doesnt get much clearer than that


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes - 5/1/2015 7:25:07 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

"The UK government informed the Panel on 20 April 2015 that it 'is aware of an active Iranian nuclear procurement network which has been associated with Iran's Centrifuge Technology Company (TESA) and Kalay Electric Company (KEC)'," the Panel of Experts said in its annual report. The panel monitors Iran's compliance with the U.N. sanctions regime.

And


The panel also said that a U.N.-sanctioned subsidiary of the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), the Irano Hind Shipping Company (IHSC), has remained active without its assets being frozen as required under U.N. sanctions rules.

The report said IHSC continues to operate two oil tankers, Amin 2 and Tour 2, which have been transporting crude oil to Syria, as recently as after September 2014.

```````


Neither of those look like a year ago.


September was a year ago? New math? Newspeak?

Nah... Just new gibberish...

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.188