RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


slvemike4u -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/2/2015 4:39:13 PM)

If I call you a bitch send me a note reminding me to take my meds....and to breath in and out s....l....o...w...l....y. [:D]




Aylee -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/2/2015 5:14:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

If I call you a bitch send me a note reminding me to take my meds....and to breath in and out s....l....o...w...l....y. [:D]


I prefer Heartless Bitch.




slvemike4u -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/2/2015 5:22:42 PM)

Lol,not going to hear it from me(you will be getting mail in about five minutes,911 type)




HunterCA -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 9:14:47 AM)

I recall the first time I heard a young twenty something say, "That's so gay," with the complete non-understanding that the gay community had beaten my generation over the head about that being "their" word and we couldn't use it anymore. The kids were totally ignorant. So, Aylee, your point about reclaiming language may just happen with time. I do recall, and I'll,try and Google, Hillary saying that when you claim the use of language you claim the control of the conversation.




HunterCA -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 9:19:16 AM)

http://godfatherpolitics.com/5262/whoever-controls-the-language-controls-the-debate/

Maybe I was projecting on Hillary because I really don't like that bitch.




slvemike4u -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 5:34:48 PM)

I hope,once she takes the oath ,you will stop referring to our President as a "bitch " [:)]




Sanity -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 5:38:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I hope,once she takes the oath ,you will stop referring to our President as a "bitch " [:)]


She wont even get the Democrat nomination

But say she did get elected, despite practically no one in the country liking her or trusting her

I can garuntee you, we would show her all the respect leftists showed Bush




slvemike4u -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 5:42:28 PM)

Irrelevant,whats really important is whether or not you will meet me in Washington for the inauguration ?

[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]




HunterCA -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 5:52:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I hope,once she takes the oath ,you will stop referring to our President as a "bitch " [:)]


Truthfully non-partisan honesty to follow.

I really don't know why a leftists would vote for a woman/person like her. However, I'm aware they do and so won't bet on what you'll vote for.

But, there's one thing you should watch that liberal's usually miss. The mainstream news media elects most of your people with bias reporting. Now I know you've heard that before and have your own opinion of it. But, there's one thing about it you may not have noticed. When the mainstream media is going to back away from their propaganda, they always signal it well in advance. I've been seeing little tidbits in the news, even on VOX, where the media is starting to turn on Hillary. She won't win without the media and if they do turn on her she's toast. You watch.




slvemike4u -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 6:19:12 PM)

Not the way I read the tea leaves Hunter......but since turn around is fair play,allow me to handicap the Republican's issue with winning the Oval office.

You guys are still letting the far right demand that your candidates move too far right in order to win the primaries.

The sight of seven grown men raising their hands at the republican debates asserting that they believe in intelligent design rather than the science of evolution straight up is,to the middle mildly upsetting .
The religious right demands that your candidate come out against a woman's right to choose what she will do with her own body.

They further demand that the candidate assert that marriage is exclusively a contract that only a man and a woman may enter into,the Supreme's coming down in favor of gay rights will just highlight this issue this cycle .

In short your primary pandering wins one of the seven (a guess) dwarfs the nomination while leaving him unable to appeal to the middle/undecided/independent in the general.

Not without flip flopping on a whole host of issues once primary season is done....which of course would leave the base uninspired and likely to sit out.

In other words dammed if you do and dammed if you don't.

So once again a Democrat wins the Oval which should ensure that the left win the culture wars for the next generation cause elections have consequences and eight more years of Democratic control mean at least two more appointments to the bench [:D]

It's a bitch being on the far rights,ain't it ?




HunterCA -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 6:22:58 PM)

Here's VOX reminding you Hillary could lose, but remain optimistic.

http://www.vox.com/2015/4/24/8489825/john-kerry-fundamentals

Here's Dana Millbank saying Hillary needs to be smoked out.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clintons-democratic-opponents-need-to-smoke-her-out/2015/05/01/48c44892-effb-11e4-8666-a1d756d0218e_story.html

You just don't see that sort of thing from the left. The last time was about three months before the 2012 elections when the leftist media started to warn you that you were going to loose the Senate and a bunch of house seats. They started by saying...well it's not a presidential election year and Obama isn't running to we might have a bad turnout.




MistressRage -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 6:24:05 PM)

@OP: I agree!!

A thug is a criminal. If the criminal happens to be black, then that is a simple coincidence. If they (whomever "they" may be) take it the wrong way, that is their problem.




HunterCA -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 6:47:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Not the way I read the tea leaves Hunter......but since turn around is fair play,allow me to handicap the Republican's issue with winning the Oval office.

You guys are still letting the far right demand that your candidates move too far right in order to win the primaries.

The sight of seven grown men raising their hands at the republican debates asserting that they believe in intelligent design rather than the science of evolution straight up is,to the middle mildly upsetting .
The religious right demands that your candidate come out against a woman's right to choose what she will do with her own body.

They further demand that the candidate assert that marriage is exclusively a contract that only a man and a woman may enter into,the Supreme's coming down in favor of gay rights will just highlight this issue this cycle .

In short your primary pandering wins one of the seven (a guess) dwarfs the nomination while leaving him unable to appeal to the middle/undecided/independent in the general.

Not without flip flopping on a whole host of issues once primary season is done....which of course would leave the base uninspired and likely to sit out.

In other words dammed if you do and dammed if you don't.

So once again a Democrat wins the Oval which should ensure that the left win the culture wars for the next generation cause elections have consequences and eight more years of Democratic control mean at least two more appointments to the bench [:D]

It's a bitch being on the far rights,ain't it ?


We'll have to agree to wait and see Mike.

Yet, SCOTUS will have settled gay marriage issues soon, it's a states rights issue and not a federal one anyway. Remember Obama ran twice opposed to gay marriage because he thought that was better for him in the polls. He only changed his opinion after he didn't have to ever run for office again. Bill Clinton ran on, "It's the economy stupid." Hillary can't do that but all of the Republicans can. Debbie Wasserman Schults just got her butt kicked in a national argument on abortion and I'm not sure the polls run the way you think they do. Fioriana is going to come out slugging hermana a hermana against Hillary. She'll very likely end up a VP candidate on the ticket just so,she can handle that. The leftist news media is already asking Hillary for her positions and I think she thinks she can BS her way through that. I don't see it though if Dana Millbanks is already making noise. And lastly, the Rebulicans, as dumb as they mostly are, have finally figured out that when they let the leftist loony media be moderators at debates they're always going to look stupid, and intentionally so per the leftist press. Wait to see Hillary at a debate moderated bt Sean hannidy.




Aylee -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 6:57:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


The sight of seven grown men raising their hands at the republican debates asserting that they believe in intelligent design rather than the science of evolution straight up is,to the middle mildly upsetting .


Intelligent design and evolution are not incompatible. I have never understood the drama about this.





slvemike4u -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 8:01:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Not the way I read the tea leaves Hunter......but since turn around is fair play,allow me to handicap the Republican's issue with winning the Oval office.

You guys are still letting the far right demand that your candidates move too far right in order to win the primaries.

The sight of seven grown men raising their hands at the republican debates asserting that they believe in intelligent design rather than the science of evolution straight up is,to the middle mildly upsetting .
The religious right demands that your candidate come out against a woman's right to choose what she will do with her own body.

They further demand that the candidate assert that marriage is exclusively a contract that only a man and a woman may enter into,the Supreme's coming down in favor of gay rights will just highlight this issue this cycle .

In short your primary pandering wins one of the seven (a guess) dwarfs the nomination while leaving him unable to appeal to the middle/undecided/independent in the general.

Not without flip flopping on a whole host of issues once primary season is done....which of course would leave the base uninspired and likely to sit out.

In other words dammed if you do and dammed if you don't.

So once again a Democrat wins the Oval which should ensure that the left win the culture wars for the next generation cause elections have consequences and eight more years of Democratic control mean at least two more appointments to the bench [:D]

It's a bitch being on the far rights,ain't it ?


We'll have to agree to wait and see Mike.

Yet, SCOTUS will have settled gay marriage issues soon, it's a states rights issue and not a federal one anyway. Remember Obama ran twice opposed to gay marriage because he thought that was better for him in the polls. He only changed his opinion after he didn't have to ever run for office again. Bill Clinton ran on, "It's the economy stupid." Hillary can't do that but all of the Republicans can. Debbie Wasserman Schults just got her butt kicked in a national argument on abortion and I'm not sure the polls run the way you think they do. Fioriana is going to come out slugging hermana a hermana against Hillary. She'll very likely end up a VP candidate on the ticket just so,she can handle that. The leftist news media is already asking Hillary for her positions and I think she thinks she can BS her way through that. I don't see it though if Dana Millbanks is already making noise. And lastly, the Rebulicans, as dumb as they mostly are, have finally figured out that when they let the leftist loony media be moderators at debates they're always going to look stupid, and intentionally so per the leftist press. Wait to see Hillary at a debate moderated bt Sean hannidy.


Hunter for the sake of argument,lets concede the Hillary thing.

Explain to me how the Republican candidate overcomes winning the nomination(by moving right) once the general season starts.

How does he/she win the middle after contorting themselves to win the kerfuffle you folks call your nominating process ?

Address those issues honestly and non partisanly [:)]

The religious right drives your bus and costs you the general,and there is no getting around that.

PS the Supremes will settle gay marriage rights and they aren't going to do that by kicking it back to the states.

Creating another political football that your candidates are going to have to make pledges on that will cost them the middle.

For the sake of discussion address these questions,I'm really interested in how you answer these conundrums [8|]




HunterCA -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 8:01:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


The sight of seven grown men raising their hands at the republican debates asserting that they believe in intelligent design rather than the science of evolution straight up is,to the middle mildly upsetting .


Intelligent design and evolution are not incompatible. I have never understood the drama about this.



Actually they are not if you understand science. Evolution does not purport anywhere to explain how life began. It starts up much later in the process with no thought to how it began.




slvemike4u -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 8:04:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


The sight of seven grown men raising their hands at the republican debates asserting that they believe in intelligent design rather than the science of evolution straight up is,to the middle mildly upsetting .


Intelligent design and evolution are not incompatible. I have never understood the drama about this.



The drama is that intelligent folks in the middle recognize a hedge when they see one .

Do me a favor Aylle,if you have the time with the baby and all,answer the questions I posed to Hunter.

I'm interested in your take on them.....you guys sort of have to admit that you have issues with the middle once the candidates make their silly pledges in Iowa and your other bedrock bible belt states .




JVoV -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 8:19:28 PM)

FR

It's ok, we're taking it back.

This thread just made me think of this scene.




slvemike4u -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 8:31:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

FR

It's ok, we're taking it back.

This thread just made me think of this scene.

Lol,funny link.....I wonder if CS filters would trip over porch m......,lol




Moderator3 -> RE: Thug is the new N word.....really ? (5/3/2015 8:37:01 PM)

I think you all broke the word filter. [:)]




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875