HunterCA
Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote:
ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote:
ORIGINAL: joether quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity The lie is the point joether. The Benghazi attack wasnt ever started by a protest about a YouTube video, it was a planned terrorist attack from the very beginning. The video lie was Susan Rice, your government, your president, IS the leftist media, lying to you That Barack doesnt understand or doesnt care that the constitution that he swore to defend includes a clause protecting free speech is another thread That they found a way to remove the video and jail the artist, is another thread If you need another clue check the thread headline The problem you have Sanity is....YOU DONT HAVE ANY FUCKING EVIDENCE.... 'Conspiracy rantings' is all you have. Most of them have been debunked. A Republican study on the issue found that everything was in order as far as Benghazi is concern. Yes, it sucks. People died. But there was no wrong doing on anyone's part that could have prevented or mitigated the series of events that unfolded. President Obama understands the 1st amendment just as he understands the other twenty-six. He's a Constitutional Scholar! Maybe you should look up the guy's background sometime! I would bet money he could school your ass on US Constitutional law any day of the millennium! You lied three times in your OP. I took you to task for them. That you can not even form an ounce of defense on any of them speaks much on your credibility. An you cant even take responsibility for it! Here's a lie for you to 'chew on': Why did we not see one group of Republicans clawing over each other to attack President George W. Bush when seventeen 'Benghazi' attacks took place on his watch? Because we saw group after group after group of Republicans, claw, spit, attack, and rip apart to be the first to find evidence that the President or Hillary Clinton was 'in the wrong'. Yet, the history books didn't show one of these sort of events? Maybe it's because George W. Bush....WAS REPUBLICAN? An that Republicans....ARE....hypocrites! Hum, you mean Obama is a constitutional scholar that said, in public, 25 times that it would be illigal for him to change illigal immigration by Presidential fiat and then did it anyway? He was right wasnt he? Republicans dared him to do it, while they were in recess, then threatened to sue him, and its being held up in court, as "overstepping" his boundaries. Coming from republicans who shut down the government over a hissy fit, and STILL wont do anything about it, because NOW its too close to 16 to jeopardise their seats.. Revisionist history, the only history the RW is interested in. Or, perhaps, unlike you, the republicans realized that when they controlled both the house and the Senate by national acclaim, they'd prefer being statesmen instead of continuing petty you vs them arguments and they have plans to work to a resolution from a different angle.
< Message edited by HunterCA -- 5/19/2015 10:20:38 AM >
|