DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee " work order hours that were more than the timecard hours," I can see how that would happen. There are books - probably computer programs now - that tell how long some action should take to do on a particular vehicle. So say a car needs a new alternator. The book says it should take 4.5 hours of labor. So that is what is billed for. Even if it only took the mechanic 3.75 hours to do it. No idea on the whole bonus payments thing. When the City of Toledo ran the refuse pick up for it's citizens, the drivers and pick up workers were all given routes and were paid their 8 hours, regardless of how fast they got their routes done. One guy I know worked 3-3½ hours a day running his garbage route, and had a part time job off the City books during the 4-5 hours he was still "on the clock" for the City. If they weren't paid their 8 regardless, their routes would take them 8 hours, even if they could get them done in <4 hours. As far as the bonuses go, those are likely negotiated in their employment contracts. We can discuss whether or not there should be bonuses in employment contracts for government workers, but if they're in the contracts, and the employees earned them (according to the contract), then we can't really question the payout of those bonuses. Pretty much, in California, those perks negotiated in Union contracts have gone away with cities going bankrupt here. I guess it'll take the Feds going bankrupt for it to all work out with the Post Office. I don't have a problem with perks being reduced based on the financial health of the agency. I think it's still a good idea to keep them in some form, though. Those bonuses are meant to give incentive to the workers. If one worker does his/her job at an excellent level, that should be rewarded, else the incentive for excellence is going to be lost. One person can't change everything, and one person wasn't the cause of the budget deficits for the USPS. Saddling every employee with a lost bonus when they held up their end of the bargain isn't a good idea, imo.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|