RE: Strategy in Iraq (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


KenDckey -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/25/2015 5:04:46 PM)

I thought that ever since Viet Nam (including) fighting was decided by policy makers.




MercTech -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/25/2015 5:30:45 PM)

There have been some changes. Instead of surplus military gear being auctioned off and later appearing at your local Army/Navy store; it is being sold to civilian police at dirt cheap prices.

Now Sherriff Buford can arrive at the Saturday night bar fight in an armored personnel carrier.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/15/local-law-enforcement-agencies-surplus-military-equipment/10286485/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/31/military-surplus-police_n_3684683.html





Politesub53 -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/25/2015 5:37:18 PM)

Strategy in Iraq failed back in the days of Bush and Blair, Even if like me you felt the war was illegal, to invade and leave after causing a giant schism between Sunni and Shia was always going to happen.

The fact is there was no rebuilding on a large scale and no appetite now to send in ground troops. I doubt the ability of the current Iraqi armed forces to defeat IS on their own. The only possibility is if the Iraqi government make the Sunnis more inclusive but as yet there is little sign of that happening.




KenDckey -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/25/2015 5:59:04 PM)

I spent 30 months in a town of 30,000 that was 90% sunni. Didn't have any trouble. The oppressors were different tribes, not religion. The tribal chiefs were the problem, not the tribe.




HunterCA -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/25/2015 6:06:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

There have been some changes. Instead of surplus military gear being auctioned off and later appearing at your local Army/Navy store; it is being sold to civilian police at dirt cheap prices.

Now Sherriff Buford can arrive at the Saturday night bar fight in an armored personnel carrier.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/15/local-law-enforcement-agencies-surplus-military-equipment/10286485/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/31/military-surplus-police_n_3684683.html





I can remember a long time ago when I was working on a survey crew doing construction staking. One day we had this wis bang survey instrument that the company could only afford one of and it was shared out between the crews depending on who needed wis bang measurements. The crew chief was a Vietnam Vet and he told me about how when the U.S. pulled out of Vietnam they used D-10's to dig holes and bury all of the engineers gear before they disabled the 10's and left them to rot. It's not just things that go bang that could be brought back and isn't. It's not just stuff Sheriff's can use. They had labs, dentists and doctors in Iraq. They purified water and treated sewage. They built infrastructure for the Iraqis and left all of that stuff, or buried it.




Sanity -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/25/2015 7:06:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Strategy in Iraq failed back in the days of Bush and Blair, Even if like me you felt the war was illegal, to invade and leave after causing a giant schism between Sunni and Shia was always going to happen.

The fact is there was no rebuilding on a large scale and no appetite now to send in ground troops. I doubt the ability of the current Iraqi armed forces to defeat IS on their own. The only possibility is if the Iraqi government make the Sunnis more inclusive but as yet there is little sign of that happening.


Obama claimed that Iraq was all peaches and cream soon after he took over. Called ISIS "JV" and put them on ignore because (he claimed) they were no big deal. So how did Obamas strategy fail under Bush and Blair, if (according to Barack) it was all sunshine and roses when Barack assumed control

Barack Obama:

quote:


'We're Leaving Behind a Sovereign, Stable and Self-Reliant Iraq'

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/14/remarks-president-and-first-lady-end-war-iraq



Joe Biden:

quote:

“I am very optimistic about Iraq. I think it’s gonna be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re gonna see 90,000 American troops come marchin’ home by the end of the summer. You’re gonna see a stable government in Iraq that is actually movin’ toward a representative government. I’ve been there 17 times now. I go about every two months, three months. I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society. It’s impressed me. I’ve been impressed, how they have been deciding to use the political process, rather than guns, to settle their differences.”

http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/12/watch-joe-biden-call-iraq-one-of-the-great-achievements-of-this-administration/




DesideriScuri -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/25/2015 7:10:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Strategy in Iraq failed back in the days of Bush and Blair, Even if like me you felt the war was illegal, to invade and leave after causing a giant schism between Sunni and Shia was always going to happen.
The fact is there was no rebuilding on a large scale and no appetite now to send in ground troops. I doubt the ability of the current Iraqi armed forces to defeat IS on their own. The only possibility is if the Iraqi government make the Sunnis more inclusive but as yet there is little sign of that happening.


The "stretegy" in the OP wasn't about how to fight a war, or why to enter into a war, but the strategy for dealing with hard assets afterwards.




KenDckey -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/25/2015 7:15:55 PM)

And how to continue the fight




Politesub53 -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/26/2015 4:21:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Strategy in Iraq failed back in the days of Bush and Blair, Even if like me you felt the war was illegal, to invade and leave after causing a giant schism between Sunni and Shia was always going to happen.
The fact is there was no rebuilding on a large scale and no appetite now to send in ground troops. I doubt the ability of the current Iraqi armed forces to defeat IS on their own. The only possibility is if the Iraqi government make the Sunnis more inclusive but as yet there is little sign of that happening.


The "stretegy" in the OP wasn't about how to fight a war, or why to enter into a war, but the strategy for dealing with hard assets afterwards.



Well duh.......WTF did you think my post was about.




Aylee -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/26/2015 4:55:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Strategy in Iraq failed back in the days of Bush and Blair, Even if like me you felt the war was illegal, to invade and leave after causing a giant schism between Sunni and Shia was always going to happen.
The fact is there was no rebuilding on a large scale and no appetite now to send in ground troops. I doubt the ability of the current Iraqi armed forces to defeat IS on their own. The only possibility is if the Iraqi government make the Sunnis more inclusive but as yet there is little sign of that happening.


The "stretegy" in the OP wasn't about how to fight a war, or why to enter into a war, but the strategy for dealing with hard assets afterwards.



Well duh.......WTF did you think my post was about.



It is not about hard assets left behind.




Politesub53 -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/27/2015 12:23:00 PM)

I dont recall mentioning hard assets, just a broken State ?

The OP is clearly about the irony of IS capturing and using weapons supplied by the US.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/27/2015 12:35:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
I dont recall mentioning hard assets, just a broken State ?
The OP is clearly about the irony of IS capturing and using weapons supplied by the US.


Hard assets = equipment




Politesub53 -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/27/2015 12:49:22 PM)

Lmfao........ What do you think weapons are ?




DesideriScuri -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/27/2015 1:55:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Lmfao........ What do you think weapons are ?


They are part of the "hard assets." You didn't mention the term "hard assets," that is true. But, the OP mentioned our equipment, aka "hard assets."

Are you really having that much difficulty following the Americanized English language?




mnottertail -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/27/2015 1:56:30 PM)

How much of our hard assets did W leave in Iraq?




Politesub53 -> RE: Strategy in Iraq (5/27/2015 4:10:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Lmfao........ What do you think weapons are ?


They are part of the "hard assets." You didn't mention the term "hard assets," that is true. But, the OP mentioned our equipment, aka "hard assets."

Are you really having that much difficulty following the Americanized English language?



You missed the point of the OP.


And no, I am fully capable of following your bastardised version of the English language.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875