Are the Dr. Lomp EP Lupus Rigeast canings faked? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


hafnium -> Are the Dr. Lomp EP Lupus Rigeast canings faked? (5/26/2015 1:25:21 AM)

I have seen many of the Dr. Lomp and EP canings, where they never bother to cover the four sides of someone's butt when being caned, yet, I watched this judicial video just now, and I wondered WHY they cover what they do.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5ab_1172940415&p=1

Of course, it's protection. But why would a judicial caning need more or less protection than an EP RigEast, Lupus films, caning?
Are the Hungarian filmed canings faked?
Or do the Malays just do things different?




sweetieDA -> RE: Are the Dr. Lomp EP Lupus Rigeast canings faked? (5/26/2015 3:01:57 AM)

I've only ever seen the ones where they are covered. I'm not sure why they wouldn't cover them though... hopefully someone can give some insight.




sweetieDA -> RE: Are the Dr. Lomp EP Lupus Rigeast canings faked? (5/26/2015 3:37:24 AM)

Just looked at some of the EP canings.

It seems you're comparing a BDSM typical caning to a judicial caning.

A judicial caning is much more painful and dangerous than a typical BDSM caning. The cane is much thicker, longer and more rigid. Each blow splits the skin open, sometimes 1 or 2cm wide. The caning will take a long time to heal and the scarring will be permanent. It is crucial to avoid hitting bones or organs, hence the padding. Judicial canings are often administered using both hands to hold the cane, to deliver the necessary speed and force.

A BDSM caning is, most often, done with a shorter, thinner, more flexible cane. Although it is still good practice to avoid the spine and kidneys, there is not much risk of injury if a blow does land astray. Although some canings can split the skin, this is nowhere near as fast or extensive as a judicial caning. BDSM canings are usually carried out with the Dom holding the cane with just one hand. Scarring is highly unlikely.




Telios -> RE: Are the Dr. Lomp EP Lupus Rigeast canings faked? (5/29/2015 4:21:02 AM)

I would think all the porn films are fake.




Tumbler -> RE: Are the Dr. Lomp EP Lupus Rigeast canings faked? (6/2/2015 8:24:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Telios

I would think all the porn films are fake.


Actually, only people who have never seen porn say it's all unrealistic.
There's another thread here that I just saw which covers this topic.
elitepain and mood pic movies are real?

A lot of people watch porn, not just men. I answered there that each of the top five porn sites (XVideos, XHamster, Pornhub, XXNX, and Redtube) have more hits daily than Google, Twitter, and Facebook combined.

If all porn were unrealistic, you wouldn't get that.

In my opinion, about 1/3 of the porn out there is extremely realistic as it's just people doing things, like having sex or giving blowjobs or face sitting or fisting or whatever. That kind of porn, it turns out, is as realistic as it gets. Much more so than any production movie you've ever seen in your life, as there's no editing. Just some gal turning on the video, and then walking over to the bed and getting spanked or fucked or whatever and then turning off the video when it's all done. That's it. No edits. Just reality.

And that is about 1/3 of the porn out there, so anytime you hear someone say porn isn't realistic, you just have to understand they don't know what they're talking about. It's like saying all food taste terrible. Some does. Some don't.

There is for sure about 1/3 of the porn out there that is highly unrealistic. Almost any femdom film, for example, that has CFNM or a dressed-to-kill Domme pulling on a guy's cock or him licking her boots or two twenty-something dames and a fat old guy, or whatever. They're not realistic, and they're not even close to realistic. Most of the time, the girls don't even know what they're doing and they keep looking up at the cameraman to see if they're on target.

Then there is that other 1/3 of porn tout there hat I haven't seen yet.





Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875