TheWriter13
Posts: 77
Joined: 6/29/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady quote:
ORIGINAL: TheWriter13 quote:
ORIGINAL: Tumbler I don't see the difference between calling the op a bottom or a submissive. same thing to me. My thoughts exactly. This may not apply to either one of you, but a masochist is the bottom-receiver of a sadist-giver. There are masochists who simply enjoy receiving pain, engage in BDSM sensation/edge play, and do not want to be dominated. They do not identify as submissive. There are Dominants who get on the receiving end of a flogger, a paddle and/or a cane. Some Dominants will want to get spanked by a spanking Top, and they do not suddenly become submissive or seek to be dominated. There are fetishists who identify as submissive, but who are not on the receiving end of their fetish. Take a foot fetishist, as a prime example. Who is doing the giving, and who is doing the receiving? Is the fetishist being the Dominant one? (He could be if he were a shoe fetishist in charge of the scene with his submissive.) Goreans, from what I understand, adhere to the M/s form of D/s. Their submissives are slaves, but not bottoms. Why? Because Goreans do not believe in practicing BDSM as a general rule. Some might, but they believe their form of Male Supremacist-like D/s is not BDSM play. Therefore, it is misleading to characterize a bottoming activity as being the same as a submissive activity, or of a BDSM bottom as being a D/s submissive. This often leads to the hurling of the "fake" sub or "fake" Dominant label, because they are not one and the same. Just saying, DreamLady Okay I see your point and I'll admit that does sound like me slightly.
_____________________________
Men have called me mad; but the question is not settled, whether madness is or is not the loftiest of intelligence...-Edgar Allan Poe
|