joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote:
ORIGINAL: joether One large criminal conspiracy rant, RealOne...... Your going to accuse someone of wrong doing, you better have the evidence that can hold up to a fair cross examination. Your usual 'fair' and 'rants' would not be enough. Dont break your arm waving that flag joe. http://www.fulldisclosure.net/2009/07/jail-cell-911-call-raises-more-alarm/ UPDATE: U.S. SUPREME COURT DENIES RELIEF. U. S. Supreme Court has denied the application for a "Stay of Execution" (of civil contempt sentence) for jailed attorney Richard I. Fine. http://www.ahrc.se/new/index.php/src/... Related, this goes to the top: My Dad Tried to Right a Wrong, Now He's Behind Bars Unjustly http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2010/01/judges-jailing-to-block-free-speech.html Retaliation against Richard Fine, who holds a PhD in international law and served as an anti-trust prosecutor at the Department of Justice in Washington DC, for exposing judicial corruption. Fine has been jailed in the LA County Jail for over a year in solitary confinement. He never had a trial, there has been no conviction, nor any sentence to keep him there. Sheriff LeRoy Baca claims he does not know why Fine is in jail, yet he keeps him there and failed to answer Fines Writ of Habeas Corpus. Baca refused to allow a filmed interview with Fine until Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit on behalf of Full Disclosure Network, and then, out of the blue, he changed his mind and granted a filmed interview with them. Sheriff LeRoy Baca was subject to term limits, but prior to his last election, he filed a lawsuit to get out from under term limits. The Superior Court judge ruled in his favor (surprise!). Term limits are a prevention against corruption. The lawsuit was approved by the County Supervisors who paid for it with the taxpayers money; the taxpayers had previously voted in term limits, but it was overturned for Sheriff Baca. Sheriff LeRoy Baca is up for re-election June 8, 2010. No one is running against him. He makes $268,000 a year in this position. In this interview, Fine tells us that the special interests behind the County Supervisors are the real estate developers, who gave money to Supervisor Antonovich and Supervisor Knabe, who were then disallowed from voting on a related Environmental Impact Report that Fine submitted in a real estate development case. They voted illegally in favor of the developers. This is how our government is usurped by criminals and corruption within the system. Fine is imprisoned because of political reasons: 1. Fine exposed L.A. Superior Court judges of taking illegal money from the County, in violation of the California State Constitution. 2. The County Supervisors were using public tax money to pay off the Superior Court judges. 3. The Superior Court Judges decided cases in favor of the County (Fine reports that since 2005 to present, only 3 people have won cases against the County as a result of the bribes). 4. The California State Legislature have given the judges and County Supervisors immunity from prosecution for their actions and misappropriation of taxpayer money. 5. The judges have tried to get Mr. Fine disbarred from the California State Bar as a result of the lawsuit he filed on behalf of the taxpayers who were denied due process. 6. Superior Court Judge David Yaffe (accused judge) failed to recuse himself and sent Fine to prison. He also failed to cite any precedent (denying Fine due process). 7. L.A. County Sheriff LeRoy Baca illegally imprisoned Fine, and Fine is in jail today. 8. Fine should have been released within 5 days, according to the law. (WILLIAM T FARR Case which set 5 days as maximum confinement for civil contempt. Farr was the newspaper reporter who chose to serve 46 days in jail rather than disclose a confidential source) Letter to U.S. Supreme Court Justices regarding California Court Corruption and the Financial Crisis Case: Richard I. Fine v Sheriff of County of Los Angeles, Docket # 09A827, Conference Hearing Date 4/23/2010. Update. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keuMuG... Newly released court transcript reveals conflict of judge who refused to recuse. US Supreme Court denies freedom and supports "coercive confinement" without charge or conviction, Ignoring all Supreme Court Precendent. Court Transcript available at http://www.fulldisclosure.net/Documents/YaffeAdmissionTranscript.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrUv6riFSRA quote:
Ex-lawyer jailed 14 months, but not charged with a crime By Abbie Boudreau, Emily Probst and Dana Rosenblatt, CNN Special Investigations Unit May 24, 2010 10:17 a.m. EDT Former Beverly Hills lawyer Richard Fine is led back to his cell at L.A.'s Men's Central Jail. Former Beverly Hills lawyer Richard Fine is led back to his cell at L.A.'s Men's Central Jail. STORY HIGHLIGHTS Former Beverly Hills lawyer has been in solitary confinement for 14 months Richard Fine, 70, is not charged with a crime; he's being held in contempt Supreme Court decides Monday it won't hear the case Los Angeles, California (CNN) -- Once a dapper Beverly Hills attorney known for his bow tie, Richard Fine has been held in solitary confinement at Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail for 14 months, even though he's never been charged with a crime. Fine, a 70-year- old taxpayer's advocate who once worked for the Department of Justice, is being held for contempt of court. Superior Court Judge David Yaffe found Fine in contempt after he refused to turn over financial documents and answer questions when ordered to pay an opposing party's attorney's fees, according to court documents. http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/05/24/jailed.lawyer.richard.fine/ quote:
Ex-lawyer jailed 14 months, but not charged with a crime Los Angeles, CA. Prominent former Attorney Richard I Fine, made a second 9-1-1 call from his cell in the Los Angeles County Central Men’s Jail to the Full Disclosure Network® raising alarming issues regarding the ethics and procedures of the U. S. Central District Court in California. Having spent the last four months in solitary confinement, Richard Fine has had nothing to do but document and describe the shocking tactics of what appears to be an insular Judicial buddy system that could only be compared to the “code of silence” deployed by street cops when one of their own is confronted with accusations of abuse. In an exclusive thirteen minute video news blog Full Disclosure Network® has combined the actual court records, audio report via telephone from Richard Fine who is representing himself against the entire California Judicial system, from his jail cell. With the help of cadre of dedicated volunteers acting as messengers, paralegals, secretarial staff and moral support base, Richard I Fine has used his total recall of the Federal Codes to dictate and draft dozens of court filings in several on going cases. He is determined to win his freedom from an indefinite jail sentence for civil contempt of court, and to win back his license to practice that was taken from him while fighting to reform the California Judicial System. In the Video and in court documents Fine describes how the Federal Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle delayed action, issued court orders that were never acted upon and wrote a Report and Recommendation to deny Fine’s Writ of Habeas Corpus (request for immediate release from jail) without having ever read the petition. And, in conclusion, Fine alleges that both Judges failed to disclose a serious conflict that should have precluded them from even hearing the case. So you find a handful a cases that are unrelated to each other and string them together and say "HA! See, there is a chain that shows all judges and lawyers are evil!". Reality, you are simply telling us that 1-10% of lawyers is corrupted. That we have known this for over fifty years if not more is not known. Yes, there are lawyers and judges whom are not only lawful, but ethical. In our system of government and justice, we do not have many positive vehicles for motivation, but plenty of negative ones, to keep those lawyers and judges in line. It may come as a surprise to you, but many lawyers do not do their job.....just for the money....they earn. Some are principled. Some have a crusade. Some like the philosophy. A handful of cases, unrelated to each other, does not make for a conspiracy against the public. That one person went without trial for so long, is...ALSO...a failure of the press to perform its civil duty.
|