Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

More From Kansas


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> More From Kansas Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
More From Kansas - 6/9/2015 7:03:36 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
That sound you hear in Kansas is the footsteps of politicians running away from a new state requirement that limits welfare recipients to no more than $25 a day in withdrawals from ATM machines.

That provision, part of a bill signed into law a few weeks ago, likely runs afoul of a federal statute that says welfare recipients must have “adequate access” to their benefits and “access to using or withdrawing assistance with minimal fees and charges.”

Leading the exodus is Gov. Sam Brownback, who hastened to assure a reporter that the controversial provision did not come from his office.

That’s true; it began as an amendment in the Senate. But Brownback signed the bill. With fanfare, we might add.

It’s the governor’s responsibility to vet bills carefully and veto those with harmful consequences.

The welfare bill could potentially cost the state $102 million in federal block grant money. It clearly limits access to benefits, and it would require recipients to pay frequent withdrawal fees.

If nothing else, Brownback’s staff should have observed that ATMs generally don’t allow withdrawals in $5 increments. The state law effectively imposes a $20 limit.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Michael O’Donnell of Wichita, said he didn’t like the $25 limit, which was proposed by Sen. Caryn Tyson of Parker, Kan.

O’Donnell said he thought the limit would be changed later in the legislative process. But House leaders rushed a vote on the bill, allowing no deliberation or changes.

That rushed process, the sign of amateurs at work, has been happening a lot lately in Topeka. And — voila! — the result is bad legislation.

Brownback and others now say they’ll work with the federal government. There is still time to change the law — but not to avoid an embarrassment.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/opinion/editorials/article21316689.html#storylink=cpy

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: More From Kansas - 6/9/2015 7:26:31 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
Oh that is what this is about. How disappointing. I thought it was going to be about the threat to defund the court if they ruled against a 2014 law. http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/06/08/kansas_governor_sam_brownback_threatens_to_defund_judiciary_if_it_rules.html


Things have gotten weird since I left there.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: More From Kansas - 6/9/2015 7:26:33 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
That sound you hear in Kansas is the footsteps of politicians running away from a new state requirement that limits welfare recipients to no more than $25 a day in withdrawals from ATM machines.
That provision, part of a bill signed into law a few weeks ago, likely runs afoul of a federal statute that says welfare recipients must have “adequate access” to their benefits and “access to using or withdrawing assistance with minimal fees and charges.”
Leading the exodus is Gov. Sam Brownback, who hastened to assure a reporter that the controversial provision did not come from his office.
That’s true; it began as an amendment in the Senate. But Brownback signed the bill. With fanfare, we might add.
It’s the governor’s responsibility to vet bills carefully and veto those with harmful consequences.
The welfare bill could potentially cost the state $102 million in federal block grant money. It clearly limits access to benefits, and it would require recipients to pay frequent withdrawal fees.
If nothing else, Brownback’s staff should have observed that ATMs generally don’t allow withdrawals in $5 increments. The state law effectively imposes a $20 limit.
The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Michael O’Donnell of Wichita, said he didn’t like the $25 limit, which was proposed by Sen. Caryn Tyson of Parker, Kan.
O’Donnell said he thought the limit would be changed later in the legislative process. But House leaders rushed a vote on the bill, allowing no deliberation or changes.
That rushed process, the sign of amateurs at work, has been happening a lot lately in Topeka. And — voila! — the result is bad legislation.
Brownback and others now say they’ll work with the federal government. There is still time to change the law — but not to avoid an embarrassment.
Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/opinion/editorials/article21316689.html#storylink=cpy


Glad it's getting looked at, and should get fixed.

If it's the Governor's duty to thoroughly vet every bill and to veto those with "harmful consequences," whose job is it with regards to Federal bills?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 3
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> More From Kansas Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063