NorthernGent -> RE: White supremists and the grand old party...... (6/24/2015 1:57:37 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent quote:
ORIGINAL: lovmuffin quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail yeah, thats some pretty kiss your sister shit there ShiteaterCA. They didnt do it simply because they were different looking bastards, and thought of as sub-human, simply thought of as slaves and treated that way (as an institution). I understand you dont have the intellect to comprehend, but I will say it anyhow. So everyone else of any worth can laugh at you as well. Here's an idea, look up race, racism and so on in the dictionary, see if your mom can explain it to you. Actually the Romans did look down on the Gauls and other peoples as sub human. They called them barbarians. Where I come from there is a place on the coast a few miles from me known for centuries, and today, as the Barbary Coast. It goes back to the 8th century when Vikings settled where I live but only pushed up to the boundaries of Tyneside which remained an Anglo-Saxon enclave. The Anglo-Saxons from farther up the coast termed the Viking settlement on the coast the Barbary Coast - clearly not in modern day English though! But, really the idea of a hierarchy among races is a fairly modern invention. I think it was a Swede who came up with the idea in the late 1700s. Prior to that, both English and French colonists happily took on native women as partners. They did, however consider people from other cultures to be inferior. Well, yeah, which is why the coast at Sunderland is known as the Barbary Coast - a reference to Vikings being barbarians. Probably didn't help that they liked to burn things and steal cows and the like. Nevertheless, the feeling wasn't based on the premise that Vikings were racially subordinate to the Anglo-Saxons.
|
|
|
|