ApertureLash
Posts: 34
Joined: 11/14/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: crazyml I've been called a sexist misogynist prick for saying very similar things, myself. But there are a number of things at play here. Firstly, the whole point of feminism (and I'm sure there'll be a mens rights activist along at some point to contradict me) is that women have a right to compete on equal terms with men - Not that they can do everything a man can, but if they can do a job as well as a man they should not be prevented from doing it simply because they are a woman. "I can do anything a man can" misses the point - The goal of gender equality isn't that - The goal is to enable people, regardless of their sex to say "I can do anything I can... and I won't be prevented from doing that thing on the basis of my gender". At least, it *shouldn't* be that. I think some people can't see the wood for the trees, however. When it comes to militant feminism, I think that chanting the mantras over and over can have a somewhat brainwashing effect, and make people lose sight of the goal because they're so focused on the path. Then they end up doing batshit crazy things like telling me and my classmates in college that "you can't call that a manhole cover, that's sexist" as if the worst thing any woman in this world has to put up with is the word "manhole". What the hell that had to do with an I.T. degree, you'll have to tell me... quote:
ORIGINAL: crazyml I also agree that there's a shit-ton of evidence that demonstrates that there are real differences between men and women, that do lead to significant differences in physical ability and basic attitudes to things like risk and conflict. The biggest problem, for both genders, is that in evolutionary terms we've not made a ton of progress since the bronze age, while the environment within which we exist has changed fundamentally - Neither Men or women are particularly optimised for modern life whether that's in terms of the social (we're still basically pack animals) within which we exist, or the food we eat (we're not really that well evolved to be carnivores). I was brought up by a full-on banner waving, protesting, bra-burning Feminist. Who gave up her career to bring up her children. She struggled at times with the conflict that choice presented - But her whole point was that it should be a choice, not predetermined "destiny". There was a great program I saw (it's still on youtube somewhere I think) called "brainsex" that showed that men and women do have different innate skill sets, but that they're distributed based on foetal development. Meaning that a man can have some "feminine" qualities and vice-versa. During testing, for example, the butchest, most east end london bouncer looking bloke there seemed to have the best developed naturally occuring skillset for dealing with babies. Fascinating stuff. quote:
ORIGINAL: MariaB I was a stay at home mum with my youngest and I did feel under pressure to go out to work so I could financially contribute fairly to the nest. Looking back, there wasn't any outside pressure but my own guilt... and my own guilt made me wrongly believe that there was outside pressure. I used to get upset and defensive when people asked me what I did for a living; its like being torn between the devil and the deep blue sea...I loved being with my child but at the same time I felt guilty and wrongly believed people were judging me. Are you certain it wasn't outside forces making you feel guilty? I mean, where did this idea in your head that you are somehow failing in your duty because you're staying at home instead of helping to earn a crust come from in the first place? I do get what you're saying, though. We tend to be hardest upon ourselves sometimes, judging ourselves by standards we set higher for ourselves than for others. And when we don't meet them, we can feel bad about ourselves, and feel others are judging us when they're not - what we're doing is classic transference, impugning something upon others that is actually coming from within, not from them. My stay at home mum friend is, I fear, doing the same thing. I think others should listen to her though, when she says she wants to stay at home and stop telling her how great she'd be if she went back to work. The problem is, we often forget that what we want is not what another person wants, and our empathy for others sometimes works backwards. So we give well meaning advice that is the opposite of helpful. quote:
ORIGINAL: MariaB Women do put pressure on themselves to be strong and independent but then many of us have come from or experienced broken homes. Unlike our ancestors where marriage was for life (happy or not), we live in an age where we can't afford to be "just" the happy housewife. We saw our mother struggle when the shit hit the fan; we have witnessed our female friends suffer when their relationships broke up...We have to be strong or so we believe. I'd say women put pressure on each other to stay strong and independent too. Again, people often let their empathy run backwards. Sometimes we see another person lacking something we find desirable, and want to encourage that person to go get that thing - but what if a woman doesn't really want to be strong? What if she wants to revel in her femininity and her vulnerability, at the same time as letting her man's masculinity be the strength in her life? I find it fascinating that over the last 50 years, sexual studies of women have shown an increase in the number of women fantasising about being raped. To the point where it's now (according to some recent studies, don't shoot me if you disagree) the most common sexual fantasy among women. 60% of women admit to it (and that's just those willing to admit to it). I do wonder if the rise in extreme submissive fantasies like rape fantasies is tied to the successes of the feminist movement. That is to say, as women have felt stronger and more empowered, their sexuality has become more and more submissive (in extremely general terms)...? quote:
ORIGINAL: MariaB I hate hearing a woman saying, "I can do anything a man can". I know that men and women function in a similar way but there are differences. There have been many scientific studies that prove that the female brain works differently to the male brain and that's why we are better at some things and worse at others. Unfortunately this sort of discussion tends to evoke high emotions which is a shame. Our brains (as I was saying earlier) can be somewhat similar, but generally speaking women have more connections in the brain between hemespheres than men do. Your emotional centres are connected directly to your logic centres in ways ours aren't. Crazyml was talking about how we've not adapted biologically to modern life, and this seems to be true - women seem to have brains adapted to being able to access their emotional core at all times. This gives women an empathetic edge. Men can't think logically and emotionally at the same time - we don't (most of us don't) have the physical connections in our brains between the logic and emotional centres of our brains. This means we can focus in a way you can't, but it also means we have to take time to think about it when you lot say "what do you feel about that?" We just don't know right away. We have to literally stop what we're doing, put down our logical train of thought, reconfigure our brains to think emotionally, and stop to mull over what we feel. You lot tend to know right away - you're constantly in touch with what you're feeling. We're not physically capable of that. We're biologically emotionally screened off so that we can focus in ways women generally can't. It's a hunter/gatherer thing. We can focus on our task better if we're not distracted by feeling things. Especially if we have need to kill. Women seem to be much better wired up to cope with the emotional demands of children, men wired up to cope with the logical demands of providing. Our brains haven't caught up with the modern way of living. We can also switch our brains off in ways you can't. We have a "nothing box". If you fancy a laugh, do a search on youtube for "nothing box" - the guy knows what he's talking about, but he's hilarious too.
_____________________________
Every opinion I give is probably wrong, and as such you run the risk of injury or death if you listen to my inane ramblings.
|