Mens Reproductive Rights (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


MasterJaguar01 -> Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 8:23:14 PM)

Yes. Mens Reproductive Rights. When will their ever be a candidate (of either gender) bold enough to stand up to the feminists and fight for Mens Reproductive Rights.

Consider the following Scenarios:

1) Man and Woman are sexually active in a monogamous relationship (I know, the horror). The woman decides to leave the man and extort money from him. She says "I'm pregnant", and if you ever want to see your future son/daughter, you will pay my rent, and medical bills. The man, fearing looking like an uncaring parent in a future custody hearing, complies. The woman eventually disappears. There may have been a baby. There may not. The man has NO rights until the baby is born AND he can find her. The woman has no legal obligation to even tell the potential father where she and their potential child are, at any time. If she is pregnant, she can abort the pregnancy without his knowledge, let alone consent.

2) Same scenario as #1, except there is definitely a baby. The woman disappears right before giving birth, and continues to extort money from the man from an undisclosed location, sending him pictures of his son, and threatening to cut off all contact if he stopped sending her money. All he could do is hire an investigator to try and find her.

3) A man and a woman are legally married. The woman is pregnant. The pregnancy is going fine during the first trimester, until one day, she comes home and says "I just aborted the pregnancy. I didn't feel like having a baby". The man has absolutely zero rights unless there is a baby.


Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.




tj444 -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 8:53:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.

maybe knowing the woman a whole lot better and making sure you are both on the same page about babies, etc before hitting the sack would be a good first step.. using a condom or better yet, getting snipped would also be a good idea.. and talking to a lawyer, maybe writing a contract on what happens if, with both parties agreeing in writing to it (before hitting the sack)..

If you didnt know, parents (both female & male) that use a surrogate to have a baby have a lot of legal challenges also.. its not just you poor, poor men..




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 8:57:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.

maybe knowing the woman a whole lot better and making sure you are both on the same page about babies, etc before hitting the sack would be a good first step.. using a condom or better yet, getting snipped would also be a good idea.. and talking to a lawyer, maybe writing a contract on what happens if, with both parties agreeing in writing to it (before hitting the sack)..

If you didnt know, parents (both female & male) that use a surrogate to have a baby have a lot of legal challenges also.. its not just you poor, poor men..



Both my brother, and my friend (ex-friend actually) are notorious for making bad choices. But that is completely beside the point. Frankly, for that matter I cannot see anything in your entire post that is relevant to the point of the thread.






tj444 -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 9:03:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.

maybe knowing the woman a whole lot better and making sure you are both on the same page about babies, etc before hitting the sack would be a good first step.. using a condom or better yet, getting snipped would also be a good idea.. and talking to a lawyer, maybe writing a contract on what happens if, with both parties agreeing in writing to it (before hitting the sack)..

If you didnt know, parents (both female & male) that use a surrogate to have a baby have a lot of legal challenges also.. its not just you poor, poor men..



Both my brother, and my friend (ex-friend actually) are notorious for making bad choices. But that is completely beside the point. Frankly, for that matter I cannot see anything in your entire post that is relevant to the point of the thread.


if you men want to have a baby, then hire a surrogate.. try one in India..




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 9:10:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.

maybe knowing the woman a whole lot better and making sure you are both on the same page about babies, etc before hitting the sack would be a good first step.. using a condom or better yet, getting snipped would also be a good idea.. and talking to a lawyer, maybe writing a contract on what happens if, with both parties agreeing in writing to it (before hitting the sack)..

If you didnt know, parents (both female & male) that use a surrogate to have a baby have a lot of legal challenges also.. its not just you poor, poor men..



Both my brother, and my friend (ex-friend actually) are notorious for making bad choices. But that is completely beside the point. Frankly, for that matter I cannot see anything in your entire post that is relevant to the point of the thread.


if you men want to have a baby, then hire a surrogate.. try one in India..



WOW. Just wow...

I suppose it NEVER occurred to you that there are men who want to be and are capable of being great fathers, husbands, and leaders of their households? And yes, they would like to be in involved in their children's lives?




HunterCA -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 9:28:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.

maybe knowing the woman a whole lot better and making sure you are both on the same page about babies, etc before hitting the sack would be a good first step.. using a condom or better yet, getting snipped would also be a good idea.. and talking to a lawyer, maybe writing a contract on what happens if, with both parties agreeing in writing to it (before hitting the sack)..

If you didnt know, parents (both female & male) that use a surrogate to have a baby have a lot of legal challenges also.. its not just you poor, poor men..

Maybe we should tell all of the single mothers that no they can't have child care, no they can't have welfare, no they should have known the men they were making babies with better.




tj444 -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 9:51:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.

maybe knowing the woman a whole lot better and making sure you are both on the same page about babies, etc before hitting the sack would be a good first step.. using a condom or better yet, getting snipped would also be a good idea.. and talking to a lawyer, maybe writing a contract on what happens if, with both parties agreeing in writing to it (before hitting the sack)..

If you didnt know, parents (both female & male) that use a surrogate to have a baby have a lot of legal challenges also.. its not just you poor, poor men..

Maybe we should tell all of the single mothers that no they can't have child care, no they can't have welfare, no they should have known the men they were making babies with better.

there are plenty of single fathers too, i have met many.. and they use/can use the same benefits that single women do..




BamaD -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 9:55:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Yes. Mens Reproductive Rights. When will their ever be a candidate (of either gender) bold enough to stand up to the feminists and fight for Mens Reproductive Rights.

Consider the following Scenarios:

1) Man and Woman are sexually active in a monogamous relationship (I know, the horror). The woman decides to leave the man and extort money from him. She says "I'm pregnant", and if you ever want to see your future son/daughter, you will pay my rent, and medical bills. The man, fearing looking like an uncaring parent in a future custody hearing, complies. The woman eventually disappears. There may have been a baby. There may not. The man has NO rights until the baby is born AND he can find her. The woman has no legal obligation to even tell the potential father where she and their potential child are, at any time. If she is pregnant, she can abort the pregnancy without his knowledge, let alone consent.

2) Same scenario as #1, except there is definitely a baby. The woman disappears right before giving birth, and continues to extort money from the man from an undisclosed location, sending him pictures of his son, and threatening to cut off all contact if he stopped sending her money. All he could do is hire an investigator to try and find her.

3) A man and a woman are legally married. The woman is pregnant. The pregnancy is going fine during the first trimester, until one day, she comes home and says "I just aborted the pregnancy. I didn't feel like having a baby". The man has absolutely zero rights unless there is a baby.


Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.

You forgot, and it has happened, they couple had been having trouble conceiving and had gone to a clinic. They got divorced and she decided to thaw out the fertilized eggs. Not only did the ex husband have no say in it but he had to pay child support.




tj444 -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 10:01:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.

maybe knowing the woman a whole lot better and making sure you are both on the same page about babies, etc before hitting the sack would be a good first step.. using a condom or better yet, getting snipped would also be a good idea.. and talking to a lawyer, maybe writing a contract on what happens if, with both parties agreeing in writing to it (before hitting the sack)..

If you didnt know, parents (both female & male) that use a surrogate to have a baby have a lot of legal challenges also.. its not just you poor, poor men..



Both my brother, and my friend (ex-friend actually) are notorious for making bad choices. But that is completely beside the point. Frankly, for that matter I cannot see anything in your entire post that is relevant to the point of the thread.


if you men want to have a baby, then hire a surrogate.. try one in India..



WOW. Just wow...

I suppose it NEVER occurred to you that there are men who want to be and are capable of being great fathers, husbands, and leaders of their households? And yes, they would like to be in involved in their children's lives?

sure there are.. I wanted to have kids with my ex (before he was my ex) but he had excuses why not now and so he robbed me of the chance to have a baby just as you claim happened in your examples, there is no difference.. but i am not going around whining and complaining about it.. Instead when i want to have a baby/babies i will not bother with a boyfriend/hubby and instead I will use donors and a surrogate.. A lot less hassle and less costly too, I'd say.. If i have a boyfriend then he would have no legal rights to the child and so no hassle & legal headaches like parent couples have..




JVoV -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 10:27:35 PM)

In Florida, a man is the father of any children his wife has while they are married. And will be held responsible for those children, even if there is no biological possibility they are his genetic heirs.

So if a pregnant woman marries someone new, the biological father has no rights to the child. But if your wife has an NBA gangbang, happy Father's Day.

Always seemed like legal cuckolding to me.




BamaD -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 10:29:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.

maybe knowing the woman a whole lot better and making sure you are both on the same page about babies, etc before hitting the sack would be a good first step.. using a condom or better yet, getting snipped would also be a good idea.. and talking to a lawyer, maybe writing a contract on what happens if, with both parties agreeing in writing to it (before hitting the sack)..

If you didnt know, parents (both female & male) that use a surrogate to have a baby have a lot of legal challenges also.. its not just you poor, poor men..



Both my brother, and my friend (ex-friend actually) are notorious for making bad choices. But that is completely beside the point. Frankly, for that matter I cannot see anything in your entire post that is relevant to the point of the thread.


if you men want to have a baby, then hire a surrogate.. try one in India..



WOW. Just wow...

I suppose it NEVER occurred to you that there are men who want to be and are capable of being great fathers, husbands, and leaders of their households? And yes, they would like to be in involved in their children's lives?

sure there are.. I wanted to have kids with my ex (before he was my ex) but he had excuses why not now and so he robbed me of the chance to have a baby just as you claim happened in your examples, there is no difference.. but i am not going around whining and complaining about it.. Instead when i want to have a baby/babies i will not bother with a boyfriend/hubby and instead I will use donors and a surrogate.. A lot less hassle and less costly too, I'd say.. If i have a boyfriend then he would have no legal rights to the child and so no hassle & legal headaches like parent couples have..

Sounds like he followed your advice and didn't make a baby with, for him, (no judgement about you), and you make him the bad guy.




BamaD -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 10:31:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

In Florida, a man is the father of any children his wife has while they are married. And will be held responsible for those children, even if there is no biological possibility they are his genetic heirs.

So if a pregnant woman marries someone new, the biological father has no rights to the child. But if your wife has an NBA gangbang, happy Father's Day.

Always seemed like legal cuckolding to me.

It is or at least used to be that way in Mo and other states.




Aylee -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/24/2015 10:40:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Yes. Mens Reproductive Rights. When will their ever be a candidate (of either gender) bold enough to stand up to the feminists and fight for Mens Reproductive Rights.

Consider the following Scenarios:

1) Man and Woman are sexually active in a monogamous relationship (I know, the horror). The woman decides to leave the man and extort money from him. She says "I'm pregnant", and if you ever want to see your future son/daughter, you will pay my rent, and medical bills. The man, fearing looking like an uncaring parent in a future custody hearing, complies. The woman eventually disappears. There may have been a baby. There may not. The man has NO rights until the baby is born AND he can find her. The woman has no legal obligation to even tell the potential father where she and their potential child are, at any time. If she is pregnant, she can abort the pregnancy without his knowledge, let alone consent.

2) Same scenario as #1, except there is definitely a baby. The woman disappears right before giving birth, and continues to extort money from the man from an undisclosed location, sending him pictures of his son, and threatening to cut off all contact if he stopped sending her money. All he could do is hire an investigator to try and find her.

3) A man and a woman are legally married. The woman is pregnant. The pregnancy is going fine during the first trimester, until one day, she comes home and says "I just aborted the pregnancy. I didn't feel like having a baby". The man has absolutely zero rights unless there is a baby.


Scenario 1 happened to my brother. Scenario 2 happened to a friend of mine. Scenario 3 I made up. But I imagine it has happened.


No. I am not saying that women are evil, vindictive people who commonly do this sort of thing. What I AM saying is men have NO rights when this sort of thing happens, and NO politician is bold enough to take this issue on.


To be honest I am not sure that there IS a solution until uterine replicators become a reality. We just do not have a way to separate the baby from the mother.

As far as scenario 2? Get CPS involved. The father DOES have rights. After the birth.




bounty44 -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/25/2015 4:26:04 AM)

i think part of the gist of the thread is meant to be an identification of how inequitable the law is between men and women when it comes to children...

and id add too, as hunter hinted at, how contemporary liberal society and culture has made men secondary in the whole scene. the creation of the concept of "baby daddies" as opposed to fathers has been horribly detrimental to so many people caught up in that.




crazyml -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/25/2015 4:33:42 AM)

I had always understood "baby daddy" to mean the father of a child who fucks off and doesn't support it.

I'm open to correction, but the term hardly strikes me as an example of men being let down, rather the other way around.




Lucylastic -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/25/2015 5:36:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

In Florida, a man is the father of any children his wife has while they are married. And will be held responsible for those children, even if there is no biological possibility they are his genetic heirs.

So if a pregnant woman marries someone new, the biological father has no rights to the child. But if your wife has an NBA gangbang, happy Father's Day.

Always seemed like legal cuckolding to me.

isnt florida one of the states where rapists can demand custody and visitation rights for the victims resulting child? ?




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/25/2015 6:19:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i think part of the gist of the thread is meant to be an identification of how inequitable the law is between men and women when it comes to children...

and id add too, as hunter hinted at, how contemporary liberal society and culture has made men secondary in the whole scene. the creation of the concept of "baby daddies" as opposed to fathers has been horribly detrimental to so many people caught up in that.


<standing on hind paws putting left forepaw on nose and pointing the right forepaw at bounty44>

Yes. That is EXACTLY the point of the thread. To illustrate how inequitable the law is between men and women when it comes to children.




JVoV -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/25/2015 6:33:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

In Florida, a man is the father of any children his wife has while they are married. And will be held responsible for those children, even if there is no biological possibility they are his genetic heirs.

So if a pregnant woman marries someone new, the biological father has no rights to the child. But if your wife has an NBA gangbang, happy Father's Day.

Always seemed like legal cuckolding to me.

isnt florida one of the states where rapists can demand custody and visitation rights for the victims resulting child? ?


Yeah. But gays can't adopt.




Lucylastic -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/25/2015 6:41:54 AM)

Is that the fault of pregnant women? can lesbians adopt? im only asking because I dont know if its sexual discrimination against gay men only




cloudboy -> RE: Mens Reproductive Rights (6/25/2015 6:47:28 AM)


Please get a life.




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875