|
Zonie63 -> RE: Two things that made me smile this morning. (7/1/2015 11:55:22 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: subrob1967
Au Contraire, we don't know how the guy acted in pre op. My guess would be pretty bad for her to want to punch him in the face. But since that side of the story wasn't recorded, only two people really know why the Dr acted the way she did.
Well, she had her day in court, and that was her chance to tell her side of it. But they didn't put up much of a defense, according to the article. The article also stated that they had been trying to reach her for comment, but they haven't been able to. Even if the patient was a total jerk (which we don't really know for sure), it all seems so squirrely for them to be acting like that. If he was being hostile, then they might have had the option not to go through with the procedure. Send him somewhere else if he was so annoying.
What really got to me was her use of the word "retard." Was the patient an individual with a developmental or cognitive disability? We don't really know for sure, but if he was, then it really goes over the line, in my opinion. Was it someone who might not have understood the procedure and needed to have it explained to him more than once? The use of words like "wimp" and "wuss" would indicate that the patient may have been agitated or had apprehensions about the procedure.
|
|
|
|
