Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


KenDckey -> Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 10:18:47 AM)

http://www.tpnn.com/2015/07/10/gay-man-files-70m-suit-against-bible-publishers-over-homosexual-verses/

He is sueing because the bible has references to homosexuals that he disagrees with. Political correctness gone wrong in my opinion.




BamaD -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 10:22:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.tpnn.com/2015/07/10/gay-man-files-70m-suit-against-bible-publishers-over-homosexual-verses/

He is sueing because the bible has references to homosexuals that he disagrees with. Political correctness gone wrong in my opinion.

I don't see how anyone cannot see this as a first amendment violation.
Both freedom of speech and freedom of religion.




JVoV -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 10:43:22 AM)

The guy has no legal standing.

I'd have better luck suing McDonald's for providing "nutritional information" and "calorie counts" because it's obvious fat-shaming.

If only Johnny Cochrane were still alive.




Arturas -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 10:52:26 AM)

I would suppose he knows this and has another agenda, only using this to accomplish that.




kdsub -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 10:54:30 AM)

Does it surprise you that there are nuts on both sides of any issue?

Butch




lovmuffin -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 10:54:51 AM)

Another perpetually offended example.




Aylee -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 12:50:13 PM)

Can I sue the publishers of Moby Dick, since it has no women characters and that offends me?


First they came for the Hugos. . .




PeonForHer -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 1:41:59 PM)

Sounds like fun to me. I mean, let's face it, the Bible's full of insane horseshit written by looney fruitcakes from 2000 years ago, isn't it? I see no reason why we should respect the nutcase opinions in any given text just because that text is really old.




lovmuffin -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 1:55:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Sounds like fun to me. I mean, let's face it, the Bible's full of insane horseshit written by looney fruitcakes from 2000 years ago, isn't it? I see no reason why we should respect the nutcase opinions in any given text just because that text is really old.


Regardless, getting all worked up over it is even more insane.




PeonForHer -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 2:16:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Sounds like fun to me. I mean, let's face it, the Bible's full of insane horseshit written by looney fruitcakes from 2000 years ago, isn't it? I see no reason why we should respect the nutcase opinions in any given text just because that text is really old.


Regardless, getting all worked up over it is even more insane.


Exactly - I'm with you 1000% for once, lovmuffin. So let's just ditch the whole bearded fruitcake headbanger book entirely, eh? [:)]




BamaD -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 2:22:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Sounds like fun to me. I mean, let's face it, the Bible's full of insane horseshit written by looney fruitcakes from 2000 years ago, isn't it? I see no reason why we should respect the nutcase opinions in any given text just because that text is really old.


Regardless, getting all worked up over it is even more insane.


Exactly - I'm with you 1000% for once, lovmuffin. So let's just ditch the whole bearded fruitcake headbanger book entirely, eh? [:)]

I hope you are kidding.




PeonForHer -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 2:27:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
I hope you are kidding.


Come on, Bama. What's the point in defending the Bible these days? There's nothing in it that makes sense. I'm all for defending old relics, but defending the Bible ... that's political correctness gone mad, IMO.




GotSteel -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 2:28:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
I don't see how anyone cannot see this as a first amendment violation.
Both freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

[8|] You guys really have no idea what the first amendment is huh.




Real0ne -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 2:51:30 PM)

I'll bite, what is it?

toilet paper?


[8D]




Zonie63 -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 3:18:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.tpnn.com/2015/07/10/gay-man-files-70m-suit-against-bible-publishers-over-homosexual-verses/

He is sueing because the bible has references to homosexuals that he disagrees with. Political correctness gone wrong in my opinion.


This article is based on a link to Christian Post, which didn't link directly to the article. I only found two other news articles from this, both from 2008.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/gay-man-files-70m-suit-against-bible-publishers-over-homosexual-verses-33219/

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/2008-07-09-gay-bible_N.htm

I could not find any follow ups, but if this suit was filed back in 2008, it surely must have been resolved by now. But I couldn't find any further articles on the subject.




lovmuffin -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 3:20:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
I hope you are kidding.


Come on, Bama. What's the point in defending the Bible these days? There's nothing in it that makes sense. I'm all for defending old relics, but defending the Bible ... that's political correctness gone mad, IMO.



It doesn't need defending other than defending the right to publish it. People (at least in the U.S.) have a right to publish, read and believe in it. So it seems to me it would be a First Amendment issue. The guy is a raving PC lunatic and the lawyer taking his case is a scumbag.




lovmuffin -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 3:24:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Sounds like fun to me. I mean, let's face it, the Bible's full of insane horseshit written by looney fruitcakes from 2000 years ago, isn't it? I see no reason why we should respect the nutcase opinions in any given text just because that text is really old.


Regardless, getting all worked up over it is even more insane.


Exactly - I'm with you 1000% for once, lovmuffin. So let's just ditch the whole bearded fruitcake headbanger book entirely, eh? [:)]


Your problem is you should be with me 1000% more often 😎




lovmuffin -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 3:27:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


I could not find any follow ups, but if this suit was filed back in 2008, it surely must have been resolved by now. But I couldn't find any further articles on the subject.


Surely the suit was thrown out of court.





Rule -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 3:31:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
http://www.tpnn.com/2015/07/10/gay-man-files-70m-suit-against-bible-publishers-over-homosexual-verses/

He is sueing because the bible has references to homosexuals that he disagrees with. Political correctness gone wrong in my opinion.

Shouldn't this be in the thread "News from the Society for the Perpetually Offended"?




Zonie63 -> RE: Gay Man Sues Bible Publishers (7/10/2015 3:44:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


I could not find any follow ups, but if this suit was filed back in 2008, it surely must have been resolved by now. But I couldn't find any further articles on the subject.


Surely the suit was thrown out of court.





I would imagine so.




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125