MasterJaguar01
Posts: 2422
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
quote:
ORIGINAL: KenDckey
This is a civil RICO case, not criminal.
It is interesting that one of the pleadings involves taking the Clinton Home Network and delivering it to a neutral party for further investigation. That would make it totally free of politics at least. As far as I can find, it hasn’t been acted upon yet.
This is politics at it’s finest, in that it isn’t a criminal case. Just major mud slinging before the primaries. LOL
Docket Filings
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/florida/flsdce/9:2015cv80388/459777
Hilary Deposition Notice
http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/150710-Notice%20of%20Deposition%20HRC.pdf
Bill Deposition Notice
http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/150710-Notice%20of%20Deposition%20BC.pdf
Motion to Dismiss
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Klayman-v.-Clinton-ECF-44.pdf
Motion to Amend
http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/150703-Filed%20Motion%20to%20Amend%20and%20Amended%20Complaint%20Klayman%20v.%20Clinton.pdf
Opposition to Motion to Amend
http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/150703-Filed%20Opposition%20to%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20Klayman%20v.%20Clinton.pdf
Trial set for January 2016
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/judge-orders-clinton-foundation-racketeering-case-to-trial/article/2565272
Geez... What a lawsuit happy moron!
Yet another Larry Klayman special...
From Wikipedia...
Larry Elliot Klayman (born July 20, 1951) is a politically conservative American public interest lawyer[1] and former Justice Department attorney who has been called a "Clinton nemesis"[2][3] for his dozens of lawsuits against the Bill Clinton administration in the 90s.[4][5][6] The founder of Judicial Watch[7][8] and the government watchdog group Freedom Watch,[9] he has brought legal action against former Vice President Dick Cheney,[10][11] President Barack Obama,[12][13] OPEC, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,[14] Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan,[15] Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg,[16][17] and the National Security Agency (NSA). In the last case, a federal judge ruled in December 2013 that the NSA's bulk collection of telephony metadata violated the Fourth Amendment.
Instead of calling this thread "Clinton's RICO case", it should be called "Larry is at it again. Your tax dollars at work."
Too bad he sues Republicans too or you could dismiss him as a partisan. But there has to be something wrong with anyone who sues Dems, after all they only have everyone's good in mind.
Even though I do give him credit for getting the judges ruling in the last case... He appears to abuse the court system to score notoriety for himself and his wing of the Republican party.
From Wiki:
Klayman's opponents denounce his relentless style of litigation, where he seems "undeterred by either criticism or setbacks," and claim he uses the court system as a "weapon" against his political enemies. In the 90s, Klayman deposed several White House officials, probing James Carville about his television habits, Paul Begala about his priest, and George Stephanopoulos about his traffic tickets. Carville publicly described Klayman as a "little twerp" and Klayman responded by grilling him about the statement during deposition.
AND
Sanctions and discipline imposed
Following Klayman's behavior in a 1992 trial in California federal court, Judge William Keller barred Klayman from his courtroom for life; five years later, in a separate case in New York, Klayman's behavior led then district judge Denny Chin to issue a lifetime ban on the attorney practicing law before him.[29] In his book Whores, Klayman gives a detailed account of his dealings with Keller and Chin, and claims that Keller acted "erratic" and was "obviously drunk" at the bench, and that Chin was "belligerent and disrespectful." He says they exemplify why judges should routinely undergo psychological testing.
In 2007, Klayman received a $25,000 retainer from a Daytona Beach woman facing criminal charges[30] and she accused him of not providing legal services in return. The Florida Bar Association mediated the matter and Klayman agreed to pay off a small portion within 90 days, but after the deadline lapsed he was reprimanded by the association.[31][32]
In 2014, Klayman agreed to be publicly censured by the D.C. bar. Klayman represented three individuals who had sued Judicial Watch, his former employer and client, but he failed to obtain Judicial Watch's consent to waive his conflict of interest. Klayman maintained that the bar "recognized there was no evidence of dishonesty or personal gain."
I don't dismiss him as a partisan. I dismiss him as an attention whore, who is mostly wasting my tax dollars for his own personal gain.
|
Clinton's RICO case - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread