Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Our children don't belong to us


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Our children don't belong to us Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 7:14:48 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
http://www.tpnn.com/2015/07/16/msnbc-video-we-have-to-break-through-the-idea-that-kids-belong-to-their-parents/

Shades of the Clinton it takes a village. Take the responsibility of parenting a child and give it to government. Government is always right and parents are just wrong.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 7:45:21 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
Is the more common view that children are their parents' property, then? Seems peculiar to me.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 9:05:56 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
its only ok to own your children if you are strict christian, married heterosexual, middle class working parents.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 9:08:11 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
Who is responsible for children if not their parents? Who do they belong to? The state?



_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 9:14:31 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
I wouldn't have thought children are the 'property' of anyone at all.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 9:15:00 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
responsible for, and own, are different


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 9:20:33 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
I don't recall anyone on here stating that children are our property.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 9:30:07 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
funny I didnt say property.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 10:17:14 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.tpnn.com/2015/07/16/msnbc-video-we-have-to-break-through-the-idea-that-kids-belong-to-their-parents/

Shades of the Clinton it takes a village. Take the responsibility of parenting a child and give it to government. Government is always right and parents are just wrong.


The Tea Party has its own 'news' agency now? What? Is FOX 'news' not enough?

This idea has been 'out in the airwaves' for over a year. In fact, if you study this lady's material, it goes father back. Why is it a 'news' story today? Did it take the author a full year to think up a half-witted argument?

I get a chuckle at the 'Obamapool Reflections', which is created by ANOTHER person from tpnn, Not, Melissa Harris-Perry. So you just know that 'poem' is full of shit, half baked truths, and devoid of anything really honest. Just like the Tea Party it serves....

So let's discussion this tpnn's author's ideas seriously....

"It takes a village to raise a child", is a title of a book from Mrs. Clinton. Its also an African proverb. Could even be argued the concept is far older. Many Native American tribes would collective teach children of the tribe as their own. Many cultures hold to it, that children needed to be nurtured to help the community when they were of age.

But we are not discussing ancient era concepts of humanity, but a modern political debate, by individuals belonging to a 'news' organization that have a poligical agenda (i.e. no integrity). While a child is the 'property' of their parents, they are not full property. If mishandled, mistreated, or abused, said child can and often is taken from the parent(s) by the state (i.e. the community). That most children are not home schooled (i.e. brainwashed), and thus, using community dollars (i.e. tax payer dollars), does imply a certain degree by which ownership of any individual child could be that of the community at large.

With the 14th, the technical concept of owning people as property straight out, was outlawed. However, if someone commits a criminal action, found guilty and placed in prison; are they not property of the state? If a child kills, found guilty and placed in a prison, are they too not property of the state?

Turning times of emergency, could it be said that teenagers might be drafted to help a community against an impending doom? Like rescuing a dam before it breaks during a massive flood that could wipe out the town they live in? Before Clinton was born, this was 'ok' by many communities across the nation. Who wouldn't want one more body whom can shovel dirt/sand into a bag, carry it to a spot, or help place it with thousands of others to keep flood waters at bay?

Of course, the tpnn being a political organization, will try to slam Hillary Clinton, because none of their canidates have a prayer in Heaven or Hell of winning against her in a straight up duel. Which is fairly typical of right wing organizations. This 'issue', they try to push as communism. Therefore, Hilly has to be a communist. Is tpnn aware this is 2015 and not the 'Era of McCarthy'? It does. Its audience however, is not!

For tpnn to be correct, that it does not take many people to educated, grow, and teach one child to be a good adult in life; then present me two parents with children that can become Ph.Ds without attending any sort of schooling system (be it public or private). You'll find only token and extreme examples that are possible. Making the concept mainstream, would be like making everyone a multi-billionaire and then declaring an end to poverty. In both cases, reality is ignored.

To bad tpnn can't bring up anything useful for Americans. Just another hate-filled, low information voter, 'news' site. Trying to dumb down Americans. Since an idiot is much easier to manipulate and control than a well informed, studied, learned, adult.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 10:37:21 AM   
Wayward5oul


Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

its only ok to own your children if you are strict christian, married heterosexual, middle class working parents.


I am a white, Christian, heterosexual, middle class, working parent. Formerly married. And I do not think that my child is "property" to 'own'. But he is my responsibility to raise, a responsibility that I chose to take on when I decided to have him. Not my neighbors, not my community, not the State. What kind of raising he gets, and what kind of man he grows up as, will depend on the decisions that his father and I make, since he does "belong" to our family. Which none of us owns, we make the decisions for us as members of that family.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 10:44:13 AM   
Wayward5oul


Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Is the more common view that children are their parents' property, then? Seems peculiar to me.


I don't view my child as my 'property'. But as his parent, I do control many aspects of his life, more or less depending on his age, much the same way as I control who has access to things I 'own'. I am his guardian and his caretaker. And I am responsible for him. His father and I. No one else.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 10:51:27 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

funny I didnt say property.

No, you didn't. But...if you own something, is it not your property?

Peon:
Is the more common view that children are their parents' property, then? Seems peculiar to me.


Lucy:
its only ok to own your children if you are strict christian, married heterosexual, middle class working parents

I was a Christian (not strict), heterosexual, middle-class, working parent. I never felt I "owned" my kids but...they were mine. Mine to love, raise, discipline, provide food, clothing and shelter for. I taught them. They weren't my property but they were my responsibility and my pride. Not the city's, the state's or anyone else's.

< Message edited by CreativeDominant -- 7/16/2015 11:05:09 AM >

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 10:58:31 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.tpnn.com/2015/07/16/msnbc-video-we-have-to-break-through-the-idea-that-kids-belong-to-their-parents/

Shades of the Clinton it takes a village. Take the responsibility of parenting a child and give it to government. Government is always right and parents are just wrong.


The Tea Party has its own 'news' agency now? What? Is FOX 'news' not enough?

This idea has been 'out in the airwaves' for over a year. In fact, if you study this lady's material, it goes father back. Why is it a 'news' story today? Did it take the author a full year to think up a half-witted argument?

I get a chuckle at the 'Obamapool Reflections', which is created by ANOTHER person from tpnn, Not, Melissa Harris-Perry. So you just know that 'poem' is full of shit, half baked truths, and devoid of anything really honest. Just like the Tea Party it serves....

So let's discussion this tpnn's author's ideas seriously....

"It takes a village to raise a child", is a title of a book from Mrs. Clinton. Its also an African proverb. Could even be argued the concept is far older. Many Native American tribes would collective teach children of the tribe as their own. Many cultures hold to it, that children needed to be nurtured to help the community when they were of age.

But we are not discussing ancient era concepts of humanity, but a modern political debate, by individuals belonging to a 'news' organization that have a poligical agenda (i.e. no integrity). While a child is the 'property' of their parents, they are not full property. If mishandled, mistreated, or abused, said child can and often is taken from the parent(s) by the state (i.e. the community). That most children are not home schooled (i.e. brainwashed), and thus, using community dollars (i.e. tax payer dollars), does imply a certain degree by which ownership of any individual child could be that of the community at large.

With the 14th, the technical concept of owning people as property straight out, was outlawed. However, if someone commits a criminal action, found guilty and placed in prison; are they not property of the state? If a child kills, found guilty and placed in a prison, are they too not property of the state?

Turning times of emergency, could it be said that teenagers might be drafted to help a community against an impending doom? Like rescuing a dam before it breaks during a massive flood that could wipe out the town they live in? Before Clinton was born, this was 'ok' by many communities across the nation. Who wouldn't want one more body whom can shovel dirt/sand into a bag, carry it to a spot, or help place it with thousands of others to keep flood waters at bay?

Of course, the tpnn being a political organization, will try to slam Hillary Clinton, because none of their canidates have a prayer in Heaven or Hell of winning against her in a straight up duel. Which is fairly typical of right wing organizations. This 'issue', they try to push as communism. Therefore, Hilly has to be a communist. Is tpnn aware this is 2015 and not the 'Era of McCarthy'? It does. Its audience however, is not!

For tpnn to be correct, that it does not take many people to educated, grow, and teach one child to be a good adult in life; then present me two parents with children that can become Ph.Ds without attending any sort of schooling system (be it public or private). You'll find only token and extreme examples that are possible. Making the concept mainstream, would be like making everyone a multi-billionaire and then declaring an end to poverty. In both cases, reality is ignored.

To bad tpnn can't bring up anything useful for Americans. Just another hate-filled, low information voter, 'news' site. Trying to dumb down Americans. Since an idiot is much easier to manipulate and control than a well informed, studied, learned, adult.


Joe The word belong to MSNBC’s Harris-Perry – America’s ‘Kids Belong to Their Communities’ Seems to be not an invention of TPNN

quote:

PeonForHer

Is the more common view that children are their parents' property, then? Seems peculiar to me.


Only if you intrepret MSNBC's Harris Perry's word Belong as property.


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 10:59:30 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
semantics matter...so...use them carefully.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 11:31:23 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.tpnn.com/2015/07/16/msnbc-video-we-have-to-break-through-the-idea-that-kids-belong-to-their-parents/

Shades of the Clinton it takes a village. Take the responsibility of parenting a child and give it to government. Government is always right and parents are just wrong.


The Tea Party has its own 'news' agency now? What? Is FOX 'news' not enough?

This idea has been 'out in the airwaves' for over a year. In fact, if you study this lady's material, it goes father back. Why is it a 'news' story today? Did it take the author a full year to think up a half-witted argument?

I get a chuckle at the 'Obamapool Reflections', which is created by ANOTHER person from tpnn, Not, Melissa Harris-Perry. So you just know that 'poem' is full of shit, half baked truths, and devoid of anything really honest. Just like the Tea Party it serves....

So let's discussion this tpnn's author's ideas seriously....

"It takes a village to raise a child", is a title of a book from Mrs. Clinton. Its also an African proverb. Could even be argued the concept is far older. Many Native American tribes would collective teach children of the tribe as their own. Many cultures hold to it, that children needed to be nurtured to help the community when they were of age.

But we are not discussing ancient era concepts of humanity, but a modern political debate, by individuals belonging to a 'news' organization that have a poligical agenda (i.e. no integrity). While a child is the 'property' of their parents, they are not full property. If mishandled, mistreated, or abused, said child can and often is taken from the parent(s) by the state (i.e. the community). That most children are not home schooled (i.e. brainwashed), and thus, using community dollars (i.e. tax payer dollars), does imply a certain degree by which ownership of any individual child could be that of the community at large.

With the 14th, the technical concept of owning people as property straight out, was outlawed. However, if someone commits a criminal action, found guilty and placed in prison; are they not property of the state? If a child kills, found guilty and placed in a prison, are they too not property of the state?

Turning times of emergency, could it be said that teenagers might be drafted to help a community against an impending doom? Like rescuing a dam before it breaks during a massive flood that could wipe out the town they live in? Before Clinton was born, this was 'ok' by many communities across the nation. Who wouldn't want one more body whom can shovel dirt/sand into a bag, carry it to a spot, or help place it with thousands of others to keep flood waters at bay?

Of course, the tpnn being a political organization, will try to slam Hillary Clinton, because none of their canidates have a prayer in Heaven or Hell of winning against her in a straight up duel. Which is fairly typical of right wing organizations. This 'issue', they try to push as communism. Therefore, Hilly has to be a communist. Is tpnn aware this is 2015 and not the 'Era of McCarthy'? It does. Its audience however, is not!

For tpnn to be correct, that it does not take many people to educated, grow, and teach one child to be a good adult in life; then present me two parents with children that can become Ph.Ds without attending any sort of schooling system (be it public or private). You'll find only token and extreme examples that are possible. Making the concept mainstream, would be like making everyone a multi-billionaire and then declaring an end to poverty. In both cases, reality is ignored.

To bad tpnn can't bring up anything useful for Americans. Just another hate-filled, low information voter, 'news' site. Trying to dumb down Americans. Since an idiot is much easier to manipulate and control than a well informed, studied, learned, adult.


Joe The word belong to MSNBC’s Harris-Perry – America’s ‘Kids Belong to Their Communities’ Seems to be not an invention of TPNN

quote:

PeonForHer

Is the more common view that children are their parents' property, then? Seems peculiar to me.


Only if you intrepret MSNBC's Harris Perry's word Belong as property.



In both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany children belonged to the state, see a pattern here.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 11:58:20 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

semantics matter...so...use them carefully.

Yes...they do.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 12:10:55 PM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.tpnn.com/2015/07/16/msnbc-video-we-have-to-break-through-the-idea-that-kids-belong-to-their-parents/

Shades of the Clinton it takes a village. Take the responsibility of parenting a child and give it to government. Government is always right and parents are just wrong.


I think government is wrong most of the time, although there are many parents who can also be wrong. There are times when parents really don't take responsibility and the kids end up falling through the cracks.




(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 12:24:41 PM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
In both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany children belonged to the state, see a pattern here.


Perhaps if Hitler and Stalin were taken from their abusive parents and raised in more loving and nurturing environments, they wouldn't have become so twisted and evil.

In fact, when you think about every evil miscreant or criminal out there, the one common thread that keeps showing up is an abusive, unstable upbringing. It's something their parents did to them to make them that way. Bad parents account for more evil and murder in this world than the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and Red China combined.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 12:37:38 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

its only ok to own your children if you are strict christian, married heterosexual, middle class working parents.


I am a white, Christian, heterosexual, middle class, working parent. Formerly married. And I do not think that my child is "property" to 'own'. But he is my responsibility to raise, a responsibility that I chose to take on when I decided to have him. Not my neighbors, not my community, not the State. What kind of raising he gets, and what kind of man he grows up as, will depend on the decisions that his father and I make, since he does "belong" to our family. Which none of us owns, we make the decisions for us as members of that family.


You have a very naive understanding of reality.

Your child will grow into their own person. Influence not just by you, but multitudes of other people. Their friends, relatives, business associates, even national figures. Unless of course your hiding your child in isolation, cut off from the rest of humanity in almost every way. In which case they'll grow up to be even MORE 'fucked in the head' than you are now. I wonder how much the therapy bills will cost....

If you dont own your child, then they can be taken away by someone else. Do you own the oxygen in your house? No of course not. Its not something you can claim ownership over in the first place! Can you claim ownership of your child? Yes you can. Therefore, you own your child. At least until the society decides otherwise.

(in reply to Wayward5oul)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Our children don't belong to us - 7/16/2015 12:38:53 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
In both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany children belonged to the state, see a pattern here.


Perhaps if Hitler and Stalin were taken from their abusive parents and raised in more loving and nurturing environments, they wouldn't have become so twisted and evil.

In fact, when you think about every evil miscreant or criminal out there, the one common thread that keeps showing up is an abusive, unstable upbringing. It's something their parents did to them to make them that way. Bad parents account for more evil and murder in this world than the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and Red China combined.

And the belief that children belong to the state is a hallmark of totalitarianism.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Our children don't belong to us Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.107