Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Hillary Probed


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  100 101 [102] 103 104   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Hillary Probed - 11/22/2016 10:12:07 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
it will go nowhere but will waste the taxpayers money, mentally deficient cockgargler.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 2021
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/7/2016 5:01:02 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
"Hillary Isn’t Out of the Legal Woods Yet"

quote:

Although Donald Trump has signaled that he doesn't intend to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton, knowledgeable sources tell me that Hillary is far from out of the legal woods.

And, these sources add, it’s Hillary’s own fault that she’s still in trouble.

Trump tried to be magnanimous toward his vanquished adversary. “I don’t want to hurt [the Clintons],” he said in an interview with Lesley Stahl of 60 Minutes. “They’re good people. I don’t want to hurt them.”

But Trump was irate when sore-loser Hillary joined forces with Green Party candidate Jill Stein and asked for a recount in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

Now, Trump is listening to a chorus of vengeful Republicans who don’t want to let Hillary skate on her use of a private email server and her pay-to-play conflict of interest with the Clinton Foundation.

A sure sign that Trump is reconsidering his position came when he announced he was asking the renowned prosecutor Preet Bharara to stay on as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.

As I reported in my recent New York Times bestseller Guilty As Sin, Bharara, who has specialized in rooting out public corruption, is a close friend of James Comey, the director of the FBI, who still has an open criminal investigation of the Clinton Foundation.


http://townhall.com/columnists/edklein/2016/12/06/hillary-isnt-out-of-the-legal-woods-yet-n2256002

cue my stalker...

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2022
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/7/2016 5:41:42 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Townhall, the propaganda of the feebleminded, hasnt got one right yet, post enough of them, and maybe in some distant generation though..........knowledgeable sources do not tell anyone who gets their welfare checks from townhall anything.

Cue my stalker and felchgobbling nutsucker.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2023
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/7/2016 6:23:13 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

stalker
[staw-ker]

noun...2.a person who harasses another person...in an aggressive, often threatening and illegal manner...


although in this case id changing the "threatening and illegal" to "impotent" instead.


< Message edited by bounty44 -- 12/7/2016 6:24:52 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 2024
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/7/2016 6:47:29 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Christ is this one still going

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2025
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/7/2016 6:56:01 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
Whining little bitches are still whining bitchily because Clinton hasn't been locked up.
This one will run and run, sadly.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 2026
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/7/2016 7:21:07 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

stalker
[staw-ker]

noun...2.a person who harasses another person...in an aggressive, often threatening and illegal manner...


although in this case id changing the "threatening and illegal" to "impotent" instead.



You can get viagra for your impotency, but you have a hard tongue, dogshit44, its from your years of felchgobbling. As has been pointed out with factual and readily available information, you are the felchgobbling stalker in the thread.

you'd changing, however.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 12/7/2016 7:23:48 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2027
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/7/2016 7:23:39 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

Whining little bitches are still whining bitchily because Clinton hasn't been locked up.
This one will run and run, sadly.

Expensive goose chases like this one is what the GOP does to convince people they are doing something, rather than digging in and actually solving US problems.

And that's largely because they are busy profiting from those problems.


(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 2028
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/7/2016 9:43:03 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
the only "whiny bitches" I see are the liberals whose hard-on for Hillary Clinton, or whose partisan blind spot, is greater than their sense of justice.

"Jason Chaffetz Confirms His Investigation Into Hillary Clinton Is Not Over"

quote:

Whether or not Donald Trump is inclined to continue the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails and the endemic corruption of the Clinton Foundation, one thing is for certain, Congress is not ready to let go.

Via The Hill:
quote:

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) says Hillary Clinton’s actions as secretary of State have raised too many red flags for Congress to stop investigating her just because she lost the presidential election.
“We can’t just simply let this go,” Chaffetz told host Martha MacCallum on Fox News’s “America’s Newsroom” Wednesday.
“If the president or president-elect wants to pardon Secretary Hillary Clinton for the good of the nation, that is their option,” Chaffetz added. “But I have a duty and an obligation to actually fix the problems that were made with Hillary Clinton.”


This is a reiteration of the position Chaffetz expressed the day after the election:

quote:

“It would be totally remiss of us to dismiss [the email investigation] because she’s not going to be president,” the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman said, according to The Washington Post.
“I still have a duty and obligation to get to the truth about one of the largest breaches of security at the State Department,” Chaffetz said. “Tens of thousands of documents still have not been turned over to Congress.”


Chaffetz really has no choice but to pursue his investigation. If he’d dropped it he would’ve been confronted by Democrats claiming that his investigation was a partisan attack from the beginning. He’s going to be attacked now for not letting the poor old geezer have a moment’s rest but at least he has a defensible position. It will also be interesting to see what seeps out of State after a new Secretary is installed who has no vested interest in defending Hillary. One can only hope that the actions of the Justice Department and the FBI draw some well deserved scrutiny, too.



http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/12/01/jason-chaffetz-confirms-investigation-hillary-clinton/

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2029
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/7/2016 9:49:26 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
You see nutsuckers with their soft-ons as liberals?

Those felchgobblers are neither liberal or conservative, they are full out toiletlickers.

They have a partisan blind spot that does not include justice, or they would be investigating Donald Trump for several treasonous acts right now.

And that aint gonna happen, rather than do useful and needful things, they are going to circlefelch.




_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2030
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/7/2016 9:59:58 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
I see redstate, PjMedia, Breitbart, Info wards, Fox, town hall beliebers unwilling to talk about the trouble with your president elect.
Truth doesn't matter to you.
Yes, she lost the electoral votes, but nothing you have posted otherwise bounty has come to pass.
And you wanna label liberals as having a hard on.
LMFAO

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 2031
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/13/2016 10:48:42 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
"Judicial Watch Asks Court to Unseal Videos of Depositions in Hillary Clinton Email Case"

quote:

Judicial Watch today announced it filed a motion that seeks to unseal the audiovisual recordings of the depositions of top Clinton aides and State Department officials. The depositions come in connection with a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, deputy chief of staff to former Secretary Clinton (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). Judicial Watch argues that “even though the election is over, the news media and the public continue to monitor and follow the proceedings in this case.” A coalition of 19 news media organizations is already on record with the Court supporting public access to the videos.

The motion is opposed by the State Department, as well as Abedin, former State Department Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat John Bentel (who took the Fifth Amendment in response to questions at his deposition); Cheryl D. Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff throughout her four years as secretary of state; and Bryan Pagliano, State Department Schedule C employee who has been reported to have serviced and maintained the server that hosted the “clintonemail.com” system. Pagliano also asserted his Fifth Amendment right in refusing to answer questions in his deposition in this case.

Judicial Watch argues:

quote:

T]he Court has stated, “The public has a right to know details related to the creation, purpose and use of the clintonemail.com system.”

Because the public has a right to know, the audiovisual recordings of the depositions in this case must be unsealed. The sole reason for sealing the recordings in the first place was to avoid their misuse during the 2016 campaign season. Now that the election is over that reason no longer exists.

Prior to her deposition, Mills moved for a court seal on the audiovisual recordings of her deposition. Subsequently, the court granted Ms. Mills’ motion and also sealed the audiovisual recordings of all depositions until further notice.

“The public and the media have a right to see these deposition videos of top officials from the Clinton State Department,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The courts and the continued work of Judicial Watch is clearly the only hope of bringing sunlight into the Clinton email issue and completing the public record.”


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-asks-court-unseal-videos-depositions-hillary-clinton-email-case/

here mnalevolent, here boy, here boy...

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 12/13/2016 10:49:04 AM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2032
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/13/2016 10:54:43 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
here you go felchgobbler, Trump needs to unload some jizz outta his ass from Putin.

So, the constantly throw legal brief shit against the wall to see if it sticks judicial watch, is doing some nutsuckering.

Depositions become public record if filed in court, since that ain't happening, I think you are tonguing a large gob of felch, as is your usual wont.

OH, no communist nutsuckers, townhall communist edition.........

LOL.

Did you read those communist nutsuckers hard hitting analytical deposition of Clinton, Abedin, et al?

Real nutsucker cockgargling. As I said at the outset.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 12/13/2016 10:57:20 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2033
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/13/2016 11:39:58 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
'atta boy!

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 2034
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/13/2016 11:56:44 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
You gobble that felch boy, you are and have been in first place since insanity was thrown off the site. you are doing your circlefelch proud, and Donnie has a very clean ass from you now.

I notice you are not doing the 'comrades' thing since you nutsuckers have come out of that particular closet and pledged your life to communism out loud, although you have always been communists.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 12/13/2016 11:57:26 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2035
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/13/2016 2:47:56 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
Wow! Mental patient, almost...almost...a coherent thought expressed. Which voice was that? While it was close to coherent, it was still inane. But you may be able to find a way to reality with that voice. Just listen to it and do the opposite, just like George Castansa.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 2036
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/13/2016 3:11:11 PM   
AQRMZ


Posts: 147
Joined: 10/12/2013
Status: offline
.

< Message edited by AQRMZ -- 12/13/2016 3:31:51 PM >

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 2037
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/13/2016 3:26:48 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

Wow! Mental patient, almost...almost...a coherent thought expressed. Which voice was that? While it was close to coherent, it was still inane. But you may be able to find a way to reality with that voice. Just listen to it and do the opposite, just like George Castansa.


yes but allow me also to point out how amazingly wrong he is too. ive used the moniker "comrade" ~10 times in the past 8 days.

and what's more, since I've been here, ive been a consistent and visible outspoken critic of communism---any form of collectivism for that matter---as well as an advocate for smaller government.

lastly, to make it even worse, despite mnalevolent's homo-erotic fantasies, I cant think of one thing ive said in support of trump.

so, it brings me to this again: if he were a student doing this, he'd fail. if this were his job, he'd be fired.

I honestly feel bad for the guy and for his sake (as well as the forum's) I wish he'd go away.


< Message edited by bounty44 -- 12/13/2016 4:08:27 PM >

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 2038
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/13/2016 4:10:49 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
I agree. It's why I suggested he do the opposite of what his voices tell him.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2039
RE: Hillary Probed - 12/13/2016 4:27:59 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
he alluded to a member whose username was actually "sanity" who unfortunately, was banned for life for saying and doings things nowhere near as bad as he and the troll have said and done.

the two of them must be pet lefties. although, im pleased to notice the troll's been missing for a couple of weeks now.

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 12/13/2016 4:29:49 PM >

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 2040
Page:   <<   < prev  100 101 [102] 103 104   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  100 101 [102] 103 104   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125