|
Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (12/26/2017 9:42:24 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
and Im flailing, LMAO...
there's more evidence of trumps obstruction and corruption from trumps own mouth, let alone his tweets and actions, than there is with what you are so proudly bragging.
graspy mcgrasperson.
that you buy into this blatant division by trump isnt shocking, you would eat a shit sandwhich if he told you to.
Obstructing a coup? There was no underlying crime.
How dare he obstruct a coup attempt against him
What was the "insurance policy" discussed in Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s office, in case Hillary lost
Whatever happened to all of the howling about "collusion with the Russians"
It was all bullshit and lies, so now you howl about "obstruction" because he fired the guy leftists howled about more than anyone
BoscoX you had me there agreeing with you about Hilary, and I was just about to post... And then I saw this????
A coup????????? Really? Is that the new talking point for the right wing?
No underlying crime? There are 3 indictments already!
I don't know about the howling, but it's pretty clear. The Russians offered assistance (e.g. the Wikileaks secure key to read hacked DNC emails) (The Quid) in return for removing the sanctions on Russia. (The Quo) Quid Pro Quo.
The Quid is already proven in emails. The Quo is proven in the President's unwillingness to implement the sanctions that Congress voted on. (And his non stop Putin ass-licking)
Call it Treason. Call it Corruption. I call it a "High Crime" as defined in Article II of the Constitution.
Three indictments? For minor procedural offenses totally unrelated to your insane Russia hysteria
There is no evidence anywhere of your literally insane "Russia" bs - nobody is even bringing that up anymore except for you
If refusing to enforce laws were a crime, Obama would have plenty of girlfriends named Bubba for life. That the president is working with Russia to do what Obama refused to do, bring the hammer down on ISIS, really pisses you off, doesn't it
Totally unrelated? Not quite. The evidence is pouring in daily.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download
Defendant PAPADOPOULOS made the following material false statements and material omissions to the FBI:
a. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS claimed that his interactions with an overseas professor, who defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood to have substantial
connections to Russian government officials, occurred before defendant PAPADOPOULOS became a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS acknowledged that the professor had told him about the Russians possessing "dirt" on then-candidate Hillary Clinton in the form of"thousands of emails," but stated multiple times that he learned that information prior to joining the Campaign. In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS learned he would be an advisor to the Campaign in early March, and met the professor on or about March 14, 2016; the professor only took interest in defendant
PAPADOPOULOS because of his status with the Campaign; and the professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the "thousands of emails" on or about April 26, 2016, when defendant PAPADOPOULOS had been a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign for over a month.
b. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS further told the investigating agents that the professor was "a nothing" and "just a guy talk[ing] up connections or something." In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood that the professor had substantial connections to Russian government officials (and had met with some of those officials in Moscow immediately prior to telling defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the "thousands of emails") and, over a period of months, defendant PAPADOPOULOS repeatedly sought to use the professor's Russian connections in an effort to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and
Russian government officials.
c. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS claimed he met a certain female Russian national before he joined the Campaign and that their communications consisted of emails such as, '"Hi , how are you?"' In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS met the female Russian national on or about March 24, 2016, after he had become an adviser to the Campaign; he believed that she had connections to Russian government officials; and he sought to use her Russian connections over a period of months in an effort to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and Russian government officials.
Ya pops, the evidence is pouring daily. Drip drip drip.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/25/fbi-says-russia-dossiers-collusion-charges-unsubst/
|
|
|
|
