RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/5/2016 4:17:02 AM)

Any nutsuckers out there have any nutsucker slobber blogs to post today, particularly ones they find 'interesting' or 'telling'?

Cuz it appears that the FBI is either not out of bed, or have no idea where Hillary is (I could provide her schedule, if necessary, its rather public) since they haven't grabbed her up.

nutsuckerly delusional

[dih-loo-zhuh-nl]

adjective


1.having false or unrealistic beliefs or opinions:
Believing that the nutsucker slobber bloggers opinions and dick jacking are 'fact'. Guess we will have to go to the kiwifruit book for that one.

2. Psychiatry. maintaining fixed false beliefs even when confronted with facts, usually as a result of mental illness:
Q.E.D.



Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/5/2016 3:34:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

response to #651 and #653

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-clinton-emails-hack-20151007-story.html

and of course:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/us/politics/security-logs-of-hillary-clintons-email-server-are-said-to-show-no-evidence-of-hacking.html

Theres a couple. And they have said that.
I will withdraw hearings because I cannot find it quickly and have no desire to look for it, I have demolished over half your propaganda provided you by
some nutsucker slobber blog or your own imagination.



And of course, neither of your quotes say there were no hacks of Mrs. Clintons server, either before the firewall was implimented (when the server was unguarded) or afterwards.

They said what I said they said - which is they had no evidence of a hack. Really, what do you suppose the guy that was in charge of her server was going to say - oh yes, I detected evidence of a hack, so I put in a low cost firewall to protect the top secret information on Hilary's server.

This clown has no background in security. He is as qualified as you are to talk about hacking - which means not at all.

For example. Clinton's site used no TLS certificate. Which instantly renders it vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack. Which means all of those vaunted security logs would be instantly worthless.

Secondly, they had no secure login requirements. Which means that an IP spoofing attack would also work, and also render any security log null and void. A 4 digit clear text password would be guessed in under 1 minute by a dictionary hack.

The State Department with all its government money, has been hacked numerous times, including nov, 2014. It is fair to say that if the state department could be hacked, that Mrs. Clintons email server with its $149 firewall could be hacked, and hacked easily.




Once again you have no citatations quoting testimony that no hack occurred.



mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/5/2016 3:37:04 PM)

I do, you simply dont read.

You have no citations whatsoever of any value it did occur, nor do you have citations that her server was not more secure than any government server, which we know from scanning the papers arent very secure.

No gross negligence to be found even by mincing.



BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/5/2016 10:46:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

response to #651 and #653

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-clinton-emails-hack-20151007-story.html

and of course:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/us/politics/security-logs-of-hillary-clintons-email-server-are-said-to-show-no-evidence-of-hacking.html

Theres a couple. And they have said that.
I will withdraw hearings because I cannot find it quickly and have no desire to look for it, I have demolished over half your propaganda provided you by
some nutsucker slobber blog or your own imagination.



And of course, neither of your quotes say there were no hacks of Mrs. Clintons server, either before the firewall was implimented (when the server was unguarded) or afterwards.

They said what I said they said - which is they had no evidence of a hack. Really, what do you suppose the guy that was in charge of her server was going to say - oh yes, I detected evidence of a hack, so I put in a low cost firewall to protect the top secret information on Hilary's server.

This clown has no background in security. He is as qualified as you are to talk about hacking - which means not at all.

For example. Clinton's site used no TLS certificate. Which instantly renders it vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack. Which means all of those vaunted security logs would be instantly worthless.

Secondly, they had no secure login requirements. Which means that an IP spoofing attack would also work, and also render any security log null and void. A 4 digit clear text password would be guessed in under 1 minute by a dictionary hack.

The State Department with all its government money, has been hacked numerous times, including nov, 2014. It is fair to say that if the state department could be hacked, that Mrs. Clintons email server with its $149 firewall could be hacked, and hacked easily.




Once again you have no citatations quoting testimony that no hack occurred.


If you leave the daily reciepts on the stairs to the bank and no one walks off with it does that mean you have taken required precautions?
No you will still be fired.
If you don't properly protect clasified information and no one hacks it you are still guilty of not protecting classified information.



Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/5/2016 11:02:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
blah blah blah


You made the claim that we have testimony that said no hacks occurred. Back it up. Provide the cite.



Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/5/2016 11:05:45 PM)

If the FBI truly wants to nail hillary (which they don't) they will televise the interview.

Hillary has a problem telling the truth, she will lapse into her campaign speak. Unfortunately for her lying to the FBI will land you in jail.

A smart lawyer would advise her to shut up and plead the 5th - but thats the kiss of death politically. So hillary will lie, and then trust the DOJ not to prosecute.



Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/5/2016 11:22:41 PM)

Interesting...

18 U.S.C. § 2071. A portion of that law bars officials from “willfully and unlawfully” concealing, removing or destroying federal records.

Concealed, because clinton deliberately removed her records from State Department.
Concealed, because in sworn testimony to congress she said she started using the private email server in march, when in fact she started in february, removing dozens of emails from public and judicial scrutiny.
Destroyed, because she deleted 30K email.

Other laws identified by the watchdog group Cause of Action include prohibitions against removing defense-related information “from its proper place of custody” and against removing classified information to keep “at an unauthorized location.”

Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, who served under President George W. Bush, has said the evidence suggests that Clinton knew at least some of the information was sensitive, and yet kept it on her personal server anyway.

Clinton’s camp has refused to outline precisely which digital protections she used to safeguard the information on her private server. (Mostly because of how bad they were)

Independent cybersecurity analysts have concluded that the server went at least two months without using standard encryption protections that make data inaccessible to hackers.

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates in January said “the odds are pretty high” that foreign spies in China, Russia or Iran would have gotten access to Clinton’s data.

Adm. Michael Rogers, the head of the National Security Agency and the U.S. Cyber Command, testified before Congress that, for foreign intelligence agencies, the server “would represent opportunity.”


http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/275111-seven-lingering-questions-in-clinton-email-investigation



thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/6/2016 3:30:36 AM)


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

If the FBI truly wants to nail hillary (which they don't)
But for how many pages have you so shrilly told us that they do.[8|]

they will televise the interview.
You somehow think that is a smart move? Would it not contaminate the entire jury pool and ensure that there would never be a trial?
It is amazing how your partisan hatred blinds you to logic.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

Hillary has a problem telling the truth, she will lapse into her campaign speak. Unfortunately for her lying to the FBI will land you in jail.

A smart lawyer would advise her to shut up and plead the 5th - but thats the kiss of death politically.

Exercising ones constitutional right is the kiss of death???[8|]
Jesus you are phoquig stupid.



bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/6/2016 4:10:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Destroyed, because she deleted 30K email.


tom fitton, the president of judicial watch who is the driving force behind some of the forced transparency, recently mentioned those missing emails. I don't know if they have done something legal as concerns them, but they have been on my mind for many months and that ive seen, no one's talking about whether or not any, or all of them, have been recoverable.



mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/6/2016 5:20:22 AM)

*snicker*

The programs and algorithms to recover deleted things from disk, even under DoD5220-22M (not all of it however) are freely available on the net. the FBI and DoD are world famous for being able to recover info from a disk no matter how badly damaged or burnt or wiped.

Now from apples.

*snicker*



Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/6/2016 6:21:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

*snicker*

The programs and algorithms to recover deleted things from disk, even under DoD5220-22M (not all of it however) are freely available on the net. the FBI and DoD are world famous for being able to recover info from a disk no matter how badly damaged or burnt or wiped.

Now from apples.

*snicker*


Its amazing how ignorant and her computer guy were. Standard practice for me is wiping a drive - then running over it with a forklift .



Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/6/2016 6:22:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

If the FBI truly wants to nail hillary (which they don't)
But for how many pages have you so shrilly told us that they do.[8|]


Short hand my man. The FBI is doing its job. Its the DOJ (its boss) that doesn't want to prosecute.



thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/6/2016 6:50:38 AM)

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
ORIGINAL: thompsonx


If the FBI truly wants to nail hillary (which they don't)
But for how many pages have you so shrilly told us that they do.[8|]


Short hand my man.

The phrase you are looking for is having your head up your ass. Which is longhand for you were caught lying.... again.


The FBI is doing its job. Its the DOJ (its boss) that doesn't want to prosecute.

So far that is only your peurile, partisan opinion.



mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/6/2016 7:57:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

*snicker*

The programs and algorithms to recover deleted things from disk, even under DoD5220-22M (not all of it however) are freely available on the net. the FBI and DoD are world famous for being able to recover info from a disk no matter how badly damaged or burnt or wiped.

Now from apples.

*snicker*


Its amazing how ignorant and her computer guy were. Standard practice for me is wiping a drive - then running over it with a forklift .



and that wont do it. dont know how ignorant he or she was, it was like they weren't even trying to provoke a conspiracy of the nutsuckers.



mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/6/2016 7:59:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

If the FBI truly wants to nail hillary (which they don't)
But for how many pages have you so shrilly told us that they do.[8|]


Short hand my man. The FBI is doing its job. Its the DOJ (its boss) that doesn't want to prosecute.




And what secret nutsucker keylime book is that little bit of fact from? Because that is certainly one of the nutsucker factless conspiracies, but there is not one even nanoshred of evidence of that.



Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/6/2016 6:21:14 PM)

You made the claim that we have testimony that said no hacks occurred. Back it up. Provide the cite.

Which you of course cannot do.



Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/6/2016 11:40:02 PM)

A few posts back I told you Clintons email server had no certificates, was unpatched, clear text passwords etc.
A mainstream article has now verified corroborated what I said about the server certificates: http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/clinton-email-scandal-hillarys-documents-flowed-openly-across-web/



mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/7/2016 5:05:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

You made the claim that we have testimony that said no hacks occurred. Back it up. Provide the cite.

Which you of course cannot do.


I did, you claim to have inside with the FBI and the AG,and they are going to quit by the hundreds back up the citation. You claim that Hillary removed documents from the state department back up the citation.

Mr. Pagliano told the agents that nothing in his security logs suggested that any intrusion occurred. Security logs keep track of, among other things, who accessed the network and when. They are not definitive, and forensic experts can sometimes spot sophisticated hacking that is not apparent in the logs, but computer security experts view logs as key documents when detecting hackers

Go reread the link I gave you that you didnt read where Pags said they werent hacked into according to the logs. You claim to have solicited the server for 21 email addresses, show us the logs and list them here.

Read the links I provided.





mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/7/2016 5:13:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

A few posts back I told you Clintons email server had no certificates, was unpatched, clear text passwords etc.
A mainstream article has now verified corroborated what I said about the server certificates: http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/clinton-email-scandal-hillarys-documents-flowed-openly-across-web/


No, that is not corroboration of anything. cite your claims. IBD is particularly in the editorial section nutsucker slobber blog. Computer world? LOL. Not mainstream anything. Give us the name and the quote of credible citation who has examined this and has expertise.

Nobody needs a security certificate to encrypt data that is just the common way. So very few people in this world (and there is no evidence that Clinton was one of them) run their cell phones thru their server. There is no evidence whatsoever that Clinton ran anything thru that server from the state department before certificates were there. There is no evidence of clear text passwords.

You made the claim that these things are corroberated and verified. Back it up. Provide the cite.



mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/7/2016 5:27:40 AM)

duplicate



Page: <<   < prev  32 33 [34] 35 36   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.445313E-02