quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


Go reread the link I gave you that you didnt read where Pags said they werent hacked into according to the logs. You claim to have solicited the server for 21 email addresses, show us the logs and list them here.

Read the links I provided.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


Nobody needs a security certificate to encrypt data that is just the common way. So very few people in this world (and there is no evidence that Clinton was one of them) run their cell phones thru their server. There is no evidence whatsoever that Clinton ran anything thru that server from the state department before certificates were there. There is no evidence of clear text passwords.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


Go reread the link I gave you that you didnt read where Pags said they werent hacked into according to the logs. You claim to have solicited the server for 21 email addresses, show us the logs and list them here.

Read the links I provided.

See, I read your articles mnotter. They aren't testimony, and they don't say the servers weren't hacked. They say there's no evidence. So thats two fails on your cite.

Quote it. Prove me wrong.


And I never said "hundreds of FBI" agents. Quote me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I have a friend in the AG office that says the same thing. That the decision to indict as of now is a go. He said the number of FBI people threatening to resign was... astounding.

Frankly it seems like a Christmas present, as yet I don't believe it. But the friend has yet to be wrong.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I have a friend in the AG office that says the same thing. That the decision to indict as of now is a go. He said the number of FBI people threatening to resign was... astounding.

Frankly it seems like a Christmas present, as yet I don't believe it. But the friend has yet to be wrong.

quote:

Judge Andrew Napolitano reacted on America's Newsroom to the latest statements from Hillary Clinton about the ongoing FBI investigation into her private email server.

In a "Meet the Press" appearance yesterday, Clinton said the FBI has not contacted her about an interview.

Chuck Todd asked whether she's "concerned" that the investigation may not wrap up before the Democratic National Convention this summer.

"No, I'm not," she answered.

"Because I don't think anything inappropriate was done. And so I have to let them decide how to resolve their security inquiry [she's deluded like you vile critter parts], but I'm not at all worried about it."

Napolitano said Clinton "continues to lie" and inaccurately compare what she did to previous secretaries of state Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice. [just like the comrades here]

He explained that Rice and Powell both used Gmail accounts a few times in error, but Clinton committed a "criminal act" by paying someone to move emails from the government's servers to a private one at her house.

The judge said Clinton and her team then decided that 33,000 of her emails were personal and wiped them from the server.

"That's why this investigation is taking so long. Because the FBI had to extract from the server what she thought she wiped off," said Napolitano.

He said that he is still not sure how the case is going to play out, pointing back to 22 top-secret emails recovered from Clinton's server.

"Guess who many of them were sent to and from. The president himself. If the president decides the Justice Department is free to indict her, he may very well be a witness in the case."

quote:

Charles Krauthammer said on Special Report that it would be very surprising to him if Hillary Clinton ends up facing no action over her private email server.

Recent reports have speculated that Clinton will soon be interviewed by FBI investigators about her server.

Krauthammer said it's clear at this point that Clinton used the private server "to hide her communications from the world, from the Freedom of Information Act, and from the Congress."

"There's no other point in doing this other than to evade subpoenas, inquiries from Congressional committees. ... I think she gets either indicted or there's a criminal referral somehow squashed by the higher-ups. I can't see her getting away from this with nothing," said Krauthammer.

Judge Andrew Napolitano said that Clinton is currently at "the vortex of a perfect storm of legal misery."

He explained that talking to the FBI leaves Clinton in a "damned if she does, damned if she doesn't" situation.

quote:

Fox News chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge reported on Outnumbered on newly-uncovered Hillary Clinton emails.

The emails from early 2009 have now come out as part of a federal lawsuit brought by the watchdog group Judicial Watch.

[ http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-lawsuit-uncovers-new-hillary-clinton-email-withheld-from-state-department/ ]

Herridge said that the latest batch appears to contradict Clinton's claim that she didn't use her private server for State Department business until March 2009, two months after she became secretary of state.

One email, from Feb. 2009, shows Clinton and her then-chief of staff Cheryl Mills discussing getting a secure Blackberry for her to use from the NSA.

Herridge noted that the conversation shows that both knew the contents of Mrs. Clinton's emails should be protected.

"With Mrs. Clinton, it's catch me if you can on her email," said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton.

"Now we know there were emails that weren't turned over that may still be out there. Whether it be on the State Department system or in her system. And you have to wonder what else Mrs. Clinton hasn't turned over to the State Department," he added.

Herridge noted that in 2011, the State Department put together a special cybersecurity briefing for Clinton. The session would have been relevant to Clinton's use of the private server, but she apparently skipped it.

quote:

As the FBI enters the final phases of its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of an unauthorized email server for government business, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey are meeting frequently to discuss the progress and handling of the highly sensitive case, a source told Fox News.

Among the issues discussed in the meetings, which have been taking place several times per week, are who will be interviewed and in what order, according to an intelligence source close to the ongoing case. Emails released by the State Department have already shown Clinton and several key aides used the personal, unsecured network to send more than 1,000 messages which have been deemed classified.

“In a case like this you get one shot at the queen,” the source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, said referring to Clinton, the former secretary of state and current front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination. “The pressures are enormous on the agents, as the case has to be airtight and perfect.”..

Nearly a dozen people who worked with Clinton at State, as well as others linked to the Clinton family’s nonprofit foundation have received, or are expected to receive, formal interview requests from the bureau, the source told Fox News. The Los Angeles Times reported Sunday that the FBI was setting up interviews with Clinton’s closest associates and would likely seek an interview with her.

“The authority for these formal interview requests by the Bureau is granted by the Attorney General,” the source added...

As the interviews evolve, the FBI, as first reported by Fox News last fall, will explore possible violations of Criminal Code section 1001, which covers "statements or entries generally," and can be applied when an individual makes misleading or false statements that cause federal agents to expend additional resources and time. Legal experts, as well as a former FBI agent, told Fox News Section 1001 could apply if Clinton, her aides or attorney were not forthcoming with FBI agents about her emails, classification and whether only non-government records were destroyed.

High-profile names convicted of violating Section 1001 include Martha Stewart, as well as former CIA Director David Petraeus.

Former Clinton campaign staffer and State Department information technology specialist Bryan Pagliano, who installed Clinton’s private server, was granted immunity by the Justice Department and is cooperating with the FBI.

“His importance as a witness cannot be underestimated,” a source told Fox News.

Pagliano has first-hand knowledge of who held and used accounts on the server from Clinton’s dealings in politics, philanthropy and private enterprise. Understanding how these worlds intersected is “causing rats to leave the ship and others to sweat blood,” said the source...

Critics, including Republican lawmakers, have suggested that Clinton may have used her influence as Secretary of State to reward donors to the foundation, which Hosko believes is an aspect of the email investigation.

“I am certain the FBI is looking at the nexus of State and the business of the foundation enrichment,” Hosko said. “Is there a shell game being played out on a global grand scale that creates a challenging paper trail?”

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I love the smell of utter desperation in the mornings.

quote:

“Because of the proximity to Sidney Blumenthal and the activity involving Hillary’s emails, [the timing] seems to be something beyond curious,” said Ron Hosko, former assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division from 2012-2014...

Following his 2014 conviction, Lazar was effectively neutralized in prison and no longer a threat, which makes his transfer to the U.S. all the more noteworthy...

In early 2013, news outlets including Russia Today and The Smoking Gun published memos from Guccifer, with excerpts of exchanges between Blumenthal and Hillary Clinton about Libya including details following the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack.

In a 2015 prison interview from Romania with reporter Matei Rosca for Pando.com, Lazar told Rosca that, "I used to read [Clinton's] memos for six or seven hours ... and then do the gardening."...

Rosca said Lazar also claimed to have stashed “unpublished hacked material in the cloud, some of it relating to the Middle East. … He said he was expecting to collaborate with U.S. security services when the time is right. Presumably that would be now.”

Cybersecurity and terrorism expert Morgan Wright told Fox News, “My question is, why now – why just these cases, and why was it so important to bring him [to the U.S.]? I go back to what’s in common, and that’s the exposure.”...

Romanian media have reported the request came on or about Dec. 29, 2015. That would have been shortly after the intelligence community’s identification of emails beyond “top secret” on Clinton’s personal server, which became public in mid-January...

A review of recent federal cases by Fox News found that Guccifer’s extradition appears to be an outlier. Hackers typically are extradited in the event of major financial theft, such as a 2013 case where three Romanian men stole in excess of $2 million in a cyber-fraud ring – and not in cases involving a breach of personal privacy.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I love the smell of utter desperation in the mornings.

Funny, we agree too. I was just thinking the shrill denunciations - nothing to see here, had that shrill shriek when a leftie realizes the gig is up, that justice might (lightbulb moment) actually apply to them.

Just curious Mnotter, Lucy.

Its pretty clear clinton sent and received thousands of emails from an insecure server. That she caused these emails to be transfered from a secure system. That she perjured herself under oath.

And I expect that studies will show she illegally cooredinated with outside PACS, used the clinton foundation to do quid pro quo while conducting US state department business.

Just curious - if all that were true - would you denounce her, hmm? Is there any circumstance under which you would criticize the queen?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I love the smell of utter desperation in the mornings.

Funny, we agree too. I was just thinking the shrill denunciations - nothing to see here, had that shrill shriek when a leftie realizes the gig is up, that justice might (lightbulb moment) actually apply to them.

Just curious Mnotter, Lucy.

Its pretty clear clinton sent and received thousands of emails from an insecure server. That she caused these emails to be transfered from a secure system. That she perjured herself under oath.

And I expect that studies will show she illegally cooredinated with outside PACS, used the clinton foundation to do quid pro quo while conducting US state department business.

Just curious - if all that were true - would you denounce her, hmm? Is there any circumstance under which you would criticize the queen?