RE: Hillary Probed

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Hillary Probed

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed

Page: << < prev 36 37 [38] 39 40 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/14/2016 10:20:13 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Well sure you do, you been foaming and felching at the mouth over the 'facts' contained in nutsucker slobber blogs since your first post out here.

But you are all for nutsuckers slobbering all over the airwaves and giving up our national security secrets including our server security systems.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Post #: 741

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 4:43:45 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

*Call for papers*

What do the nutsucker slobber blogs got for 'facts' today?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 742

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 4:54:04 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

are you feeling in need for some place to express your impotent and juvenile rantings? you know, the ones that show a lack of critical thinking skills and an inability to discern whats actually news and legitimate commentary, as opposed to say comrade joethers blog?

you might think it makes you feel better, or superior, but in actuality, it just poisons your soul---the evidence of which abounds here.

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 4/15/2016 5:02:41 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 743

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 5:52:09 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

not that I think what im about to say will effect the 2-3 comrades complaining about "right wing news, blogs and bullshit" but perhaps for others who are reading...

ive said this before: motherjones, alternet, mediamatters, and other preferred collectivist sites just aren't telling the whole story.

i went through the thread and took a look at all the sources my non-comrade fellow posters and I have used to create it. this isn't exhaustive but its informative.

not counting phydeaux's post #300 in which he used a very large amount of sources for one particular instance, we've used 74 different sources, citing them roughly 154 times. so theres been good variety.

104 of those references came from 23 sources being used multiple times. with, in descending order, breitbart, fox news, town hall, yahoo news, politico, the national review, the hill, and judicial watch, being used most frequently. given that these places are established news and commentary sites, with broad followings, and for the most part whose reporters and writers are judges, lawyers, psychiatrists, educated/trained/experienced journalists, intelligence agents, and other reputable and recognizable figures---they hardly qualify as "blogs" much less "slobber blogs" (sorry comrade vile critter parts, you lose).

nor, since some of them are clearly not "right wing" but are instead libertarian, non-partisan, legal, or even left leaning, does that "right wing" argument hold up. sorry, that whine is spoiled too.

on another hand, to dismiss everything away by attaching tribal monikers to them is to not give a fair hearing to the reality of the situation or to deal effectively with the content. something the comrades try to do frequently. as ive said before---if you did this in the classroom, youd fail. if you did this as a part of your critical thinking job, youd be fired.

other sites used multiple times include CNN, the NYT, CBS news, reuters, AP, USA today, Wikipedia, drudge, and the huffington post. a veritable pantheon of a right wing conspiracy against Hillary!

of the sites used only once, while there are more, they include msnbc, daily kos, daily beast, time, npr, the NIH, speaker.gov, mother jones, the Washington post, forbes, pjmedia, abc news, IBD. another right wing conspiracy hit list! (try not to cherry pick here comrades when you complain)

as for "bullshit"---the only load of that i see is from the lefties here who cannot effectively deal with the material and instead, denigrate the source, perpetuate debunked lies and myths, or distract from the main issue at hand.

the short of it is---the comrades' queen did lots of things wrong, badly, and criminally---and they don't have anything of substance to defend her but will go to their graves doing so anyways because "party" matters more than honesty and their hatred of the other side clouds their ability to think justly.

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 744

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 6:29:45 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Uh yeah, 74 separate nutsucker slobber blogs, and I guess that means that the media has a liberal bias.

There is no material to deal with. It is impugnation, innuendo, factless propaganda, lets see the nutsuckers deal with facts.

Oh, that ain't gonna happen.

No, my communist nutsucker friends, nutsuckers dont think. They parrot and felch.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 745

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 6:46:48 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

maybe you should tell the fbi that and the federal judges too?? they seem to disagree with your assessment---as do a great number of other more legally sharp, politically experienced and knowledgeable minds than yours.

I suggest you get a different hobby---you are really bad at this one. frankly, youre an embarrassment to reason.

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 4/15/2016 6:57:48 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 746

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 7:09:43 AM

Phydeaux

Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

Perhaps it would be illustrative to count the number of referrals by the other side of the aisle. Lucy, mnotter, thompson. I'm guessing that with with roughly 38 pages of comments they won't hit 38 cites - and half of those they do will be by mnotter. Of course half of mnotters will have no relationship to the topic of discussion, but we'll leave that to another day.

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 747

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 7:27:04 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Well I dont speak for either of the others, but im sooo sorry I havent supplied any cites..Im just enjoying the derangement of the claims of ifs, maybes, potentiallys and obfuscation coming dribbling out of you and bounty.
I see no reason to bother.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Post #: 748

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 7:27:58 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Perhaps it would be illustrative to count the number of referrals by the other side of the aisle. Lucy, mnotter, thompson. I'm guessing that with with roughly 38 pages of comments they won't hit 38 cites - and half of those they do will be by mnotter. Of course half of mnotters will have no relationship to the topic of discussion, but we'll leave that to another day.

This certainly addresses the issue-not

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Post #: 749

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 7:40:20 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

of the 74 nutsucker slobber blog pieces, how many are refelches besides all of them?
how many contain a line like, according to a Breitbart article... or DailyCaller reports that......

My citations are direct with verifiable quotes from people involved, Comey and so on. I am thinking maybe have three on this nutsucker slobber blog fest. They are the codex of citations, not some refelched asswipe plagiarized as your personal experience, the 147 FBI agents working the case, an astounding number almost going to quit, the 22 email addresses and LDAP on the server you personally investigated (when it didnt show in the log, and slick as you are, you demonstrate you can't run google) an AG that is your asshole buddy giving you the inside scoop, and asswipe like that.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to thompsonx)

Post #: 750

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 7:46:20 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

maybe you should tell the fbi that and the federal judges too?? they seem to disagree with your assessment---as do a great number of other more legally sharp, politically experienced and knowledgeable minds than yours.

I suggest you get a different hobby---you are really bad at this one. frankly, youre an embarrassment to reason.

Maybe you should credibly cite that the fbi and federal judges disagree with the fact that they do not speak to nutsucker slobber blogs nor do they peruse them for facts.

you are an embarrassing oaf and you have shit your pants again.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 751

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/15/2016 10:34:45 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

are you feeling in need for some place to express your impotent and juvenile rantings? you know, the ones that show a lack of critical thinking skills and an inability to discern whats actually news and legitimate commentary, as opposed to say comrade joethers blog?

you might think it makes you feel better, or superior, but in actuality, it just poisons your soul---the evidence of which abounds here.

I do have a character flaw, I love to laugh at the mentally deficient nutsuckers shitting their pants and felching each other, when they unglue, I giggle like a fuckin 9 year old schoolgirl.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 752

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/19/2016 6:37:06 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

back to forum page one...

"Disgraced Clinton Donor Got $13M In State Dept Grants Under Hillary"

quote:

Hillary Clinton’s Department of State awarded at least $13 million in grants, contracts and loans to her longtime friend and Clinton Foundation donor Muhammad Yunus, despite his being ousted in 2011 as managing director of the Bangladesh-based Grameen Bank amid charges of corruption...

The tax funds were given to Yunus through 18 separate U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) award transactions listed by the federal contracting site USAspending.gov.

They highlight how Clinton mixed official government business with Clinton Foundation donors. Yunus gave between $100,000 to $300,000 to the foundation, according to the Clinton Foundation website.

Groups allied to Yunus received an additional $11 million from USAID, according to the contracting website. Yunus had business relationships with all of them...

Secretary Clinton’s mixing of official work with foundation donors is reportedly the focus of a second, less publicized FBI public corruption investigation of the former secretary of state. The more widely known FBI probe focuses on her use of a private email server located in her New York residence to conduct official government business.

“Presumably if The Daily Caller News Foundation has this information, then the FBI has it,” said Robert T. Hosko, former assistant director of the Bureau’s criminal division. “Certainly, the FBI would want to know the nature of these relationships,” he told TheDCNF.

“That’s precisely the sort of thing that the FBI would be looking at and should be looking at to determine whether there’s an official act of corruption,” he said...

David Bossie, president of the conservative activist group Citizens United and a long-time Clinton critic, called for the FBI to look into possible conflicts of interest linked to the long association between Yunus and the Clintons.

“The mixing of State Department and U.S. government business with Clinton Foundation donors and interests is a prime example of what the FBI could be investigating in addition to the private email server setup.” Bossie told TheDCNF.

Hosko said [a particular email referenced in the article] “is potentially an indicator of the co-mingling of state business with the Clinton Foundation. It is very concerning.”...

When asked to explain the Yunus grants and loans, USAID Spokesman Raphael Cook said the agency didn’t have the “manpower” to respond to questions about the transactions.

Other federal agencies also opened their coffers to Yunus after Clinton entered the administration. The Department of Treasury awarded a $600,000 grant directly to Grameen America under a fund designed to boost financial institutions in community development. A Treasury Department spokesman declined to provide any details beyond the fact the funds were for activities in New York.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/17/exclusive-disgraced-clinton-donor-got-13m-in-state-dept-grants-under-hillary/

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 753

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/19/2016 7:24:36 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

*snicker* USAID is its own organization, an independent agency. Been that way since 1999. I guess I would buy this asswipe, if the entire organization and its ancillaries was staffed by nutsuckers, but it is not. These people are not easily mesmerized by the hundreds, as nutsuckers are.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 754

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/19/2016 7:47:21 AM

Phydeaux

Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

well you know, here's the thing. You don't have to buy it - you can go to the usaspending.gov website and verify all by yourself. Like I have.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 755

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/19/2016 8:45:02 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

But rather than a nutsucker slobber blog, I could go to where the actual facts are:

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/rls/dos/436.htm
Related Foreign Affairs Agencies
Following the reorganization of the foreign affairs agencies in 1999, the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and the United States Information Agency (USIA) were merged into the Department of State, and the Broadcasting Board of Governors, which is responsible for all U.S. Government and government-sponsored broadcasting, became an independent, autonomous federal entity. The U.S. Agency for International Development remains an independent agency.

https://www.usaid.gov/who-we-are/organization/independent-offices/office-executive-secretariat

Oh, I did.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Post #: 756

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/19/2016 11:00:02 AM

Phydeaux

Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

Way to post two useless links.

Neither of which of course explain anything about grants.

Are you sayin more than 13 mil waant given to yunus front organizations?

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 757

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/19/2016 11:02:06 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

No, but you are by innuendo implying that Hillary had something to do with it in your useless cockgargling nutsucker slobber blogging factless link.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Post #: 758

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/19/2016 11:07:02 AM

Phydeaux

Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

I think any time grants are given to fundraisers for a politician, it warrants investigation.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 759

RE: Hillary Probed - 4/19/2016 11:12:47 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Shall we start with the nutsuckers in the legislature?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Post #: 760

Page: << < prev 36 37 [38] 39 40 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed

Page: << < prev 36 37 [38] 39 40 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.092