quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nope, you got it wrong again. You proclaim and accuse. Show me actual facts TO DATE, from the nutsucker slobberblogs in these 40 pages. Credibly citable FACT. All the ones I quoted are readily available from public information, credibly and extensively cited. For instance, you don't know this, because it is a fact. Haliburton profits from Iraq, and number of shares Cheney held in 'blind trust', what their share value was and when? Public record, IRS and so on.
What do these nutsuckers slobberblogs have here in the way of signed transcripts and videos from the FBI? from DOJ?

Start with the 147 agents investigating, its more like 12 or so. So, we disagree there, come up with the fact. The fact.

Dick, thats what they got, and thats what you got in your hand.

It isn't a matter of agree or disagree, it is a matter of fact. Provable fact. Like your dick. In your hands.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Im not sure how you got to that assumption, as he said he believes facts. Maybes, what ifs, probables, or might haves...are not facts by any standard of any imagination.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I am just insuring that I am following what you are saying, and you take license with what I say, so that you can derail, deflect, proclaim and accuse, but you cant come up with one fucking fact.

OK, non-welfare non-patient, non-convict. Lets just for this instant stipulate that. You just believe the nutsucker hallucinators who hallucinate like you do, but do not believe facts.

I am still waiting, you have a fact? You have a quote of an admission from one or more staffers (aides whatever you want to call them) by a reputable source and citation they used unsecured blackberries to push around classified documents. Lets see that bitch, you aint got it.

Or, admit that you are mendacious and are factless.

Your little bit of pathetic twisting shit (again, and as usual) ain't gonna get you off the hook, you got about 4 lies stacked up here to try and worm out of. Use the Mensa eligable, grasshopper, I'm pulling for you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I make no such claim, you now have 5 lies stacked up, and you are still deflecting from your lie about the blackberries. Makes us wonder what else you are lying about. Welfare? RIF? Prison? Where were you December 7th 1941? Does the phrase "Day of Infamy" ring a bell?

I shall call you blackberry bama. Or maybe ol' pucker lips. Which do you prefer?


You need to quit believing your nutsucker slobberblogs.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nope, not what I said and what you are proclaiming and accusing me of. factlessness chum, look the fucker up, it is spelled dictionary, so you got that too. Become eligable.

So it is just that in your view all of the blogs that are dependable just happen to agree with you. All of those you disagree with are factless.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I make no such claim, you now have 5 lies stacked up, and you are still deflecting from your lie about the blackberries. Makes us wonder what else you are lying about. Welfare? RIF? Prison? Where were you December 7th 1941? Does the phrase "Day of Infamy" ring a bell?

I shall call you blackberry bama. Or maybe ol' pucker lips. Which do you prefer?


You need to quit believing your nutsucker slobberblogs.

Name a right wing blog that you don't think makes up facts.
Name a left wing blog that you don't think spreads the gosple.
The fact that you don't know about what the Hillary people have admitted to doesn't make it a lie, it just means you don't know every thing.

And I told you I don't even look at any blogs.

You are displaying your tendency to declare anything you don't like to be a lie.


And now you are recycling old lies.

You never did tell me why, if you were doing so well you only did one enlistment.

BTW the correct phrase was not a Day Of Infamy, it was a day that shall live in infamy, get it right.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I make no such claim, you now have 5 lies stacked up, and you are still deflecting from your lie about the blackberries. Makes us wonder what else you are lying about. Welfare? RIF? Prison? Where were you December 7th 1941? Does the phrase "Day of Infamy" ring a bell?

I shall call you blackberry bama. Or maybe ol' pucker lips. Which do you prefer?


You need to quit believing your nutsucker slobberblogs.

Name a right wing blog that you don't think makes up facts.
Name a left wing blog that you don't think spreads the gosple.
The fact that you don't know about what the Hillary people have admitted to doesn't make it a lie, it just means you don't know every thing.

And I told you I don't even look at any blogs.

You are displaying your tendency to declare anything you don't like to be a lie.


And now you are recycling old lies.

You never did tell me why, if you were doing so well you only did one enlistment.

BTW the correct phrase was not a Day Of Infamy, it was a day that shall live in infamy, get it right.

So now you admit that no such thing was said, no such fact exists. You have an absolute habit of declaring any lie you like to be the truth.
So, you admit that you bombed pearl harbor, get it right.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So, no fact and still 5 lies stacked up. You speak, live, dream and gobble up delusions. You live to lie, and pretend you have brains enough to find your own ass with two hands and a flashlight. You proclaim and accuse the people of being delusional for not being delusional and not believing your delusion that staffers said they passing secrets around on unsecured blackberries.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

You still got 5 lies that stack up, none of which you can substantiate.

You still cant prove one nutsucker slobber blog containing fact.

I clearly handled classified info, you clearly were a cook.

I butchered no quote from FDR since I wasn't quoting him, and you clearly butchered your lies enough you are now dickwiggling in the garish light of day.

Quit the derail, show us facts. Not slobberblogging and nutsuckerism.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

INteresting news today:

"I don't know what Grassley knows, but I do know that it is generally known in Washington that the same team of FBI agents who investigated and led to the prosecution of General Petraeus, is investigating Mrs. Clinton.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/04/25/napolitano-hillary-facing-catastrophe-whether-she-is-indicted-or-not/2/

quote:

On Monday morning, Fox News' Judge Andrew Napolitano told Maria Bartiromo that while it was "highly unusual" for a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee to anticipate such an FBI leak, he agreed with Grassley's take.

"He would not be surprised if FBI agents who truly believe that there is enough evidence to indict Mrs. Clinton and to convict her on both the email charge and the public corruption charge, will feel frustrated and stymied by the political people in the Justice Department and will want the public to know what they know," he said. "If that class of people -- it would be more than one person -- leaks information to the press, I agree with Senator Grassley, if there is a leak, and if what is leaked is credible... the president could have a Saturday night massacre/Watergate-style disaster on his hands in the last six months of his presidency."

"I don't know what Grassley knows, but I do know that it is generally known in Washington that the same team of FBI agents who investigated and led to the prosecution of General Petraeus, is investigating Mrs. Clinton. And many on that team believe that General Petraeus got a slap on the wrist, and because the evidence in Mrs. Clinton's case is exponentially greater, they do not want to see this happen again," Napolitano said...

And the last step in this investigation will be to invite Mrs. Clinton in. She says she can't wait to talk to them -- probably not true. Nobody being investigated by the FBI can't wait to talk to them!"...

Hillary Clinton continues to maintain that she is not under criminal investigation, characterizing the FBI probe as just one of many "security reviews" that are being conducted.

But Napolitano said on Fox News' America's Newsroom Monday that "this is about as serious an investigation as there could be.... The FBI does not do security assessments, the State Department does. The FBI does criminal investigations."

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

No, I made my own statement from it, and your DK syndrome is really virulent, you are making a fool out of yourself each time you deflect from your completely idiotic statement that staffers admitted that they passed around national secrets on unsecured blackberries, and can't substantiate it.

Nutsucker slobberblogs have no fact, nutsuckers have no fact, nutsuckers are destroying America thru their catamiting to corporations and foreign powers.

Too bad you couldnt make it in the service and make full use of your cooking skills, but I imagine you didn't have any, since you have to order pizza and guard your porch.

You are the laughingstock, my mendacious friend.