RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


WhoreMods -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/26/2016 1:22:26 PM)

So Hitlary will be able to say: "I won, but crooked Flump stole a rigged election. Sad!"?




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/26/2016 1:25:05 PM)

Its like W all over again, but worse.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/26/2016 1:34:12 PM)

Domestic violence in 96, oh yeah typical family values non-hypocritical, factless, useless felching nutsucker.





bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/26/2016 2:03:14 PM)

"...Clinton Foundation Witnesses Coming Forward In Pay-For-Play Investigation"

quote:

...New York Times Bestselling author Ed Klein has revealed on The Sean Hannity Show that sources have confirmed to him that not only is The Clinton Foundation under federal investigation, but also at least one Clinton Foundation insider is prepared to testify in a court of law against Hillary.

Reports of legal troubles for the foundation began last week when The Daily Caller reported that a joint FBI-US Attorney probe of The Clinton Foundation is currently underway. The charge is supported by a number of emails recently released by Judicial Watch, which suggest The Clinton Foundation engaged in pay-for-play while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.

"We are a long way from Hillary Clinton sliding into The White House without having some real serious legal problems before this election," Klein told Hannity...

- Klein confirmed that the ongoing investigation is being led by Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York...

Bharara is reportedly working with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and two other District Attorneys, one in Little Rock, Arkansas, and another in Washington D.C....

- According to Klein, Comey and Bharara have been in contact for months on the subject of Hillary Clinton's public corruption with the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State.

- Sources have confirmed to Klein that Bharara has lined up several witnesses who are willing to testify. According to Klein, at least one of those sources used to work for the Clinton Foundation, and would have first-hand knowledge of any pay-to-play which occurred.

"Your sources are telling you that witnesses were said to be willing to testify that this was a quid pro quo--in other words that she sold access to her office?" Sean asked.

"That's my understanding from my sourcing," Klein responded.

- Klein also claims to have spoken to three State Department employees that worked closely with Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State, who personally witnessed her dealing with State Department business.

"They actually overheard her talking on the phone to a donor," Klein explained. If true, Clinton's actions would be a violation of a "memorandum of understanding" she signed prior to taking office, in which she promised to the Obama administration that she would not to engage in business connected to the foundation.

"I'm not predicting this is going to happen," Klein concluded. "All I'm saying is that the heat is on right now. Whether or not it's going to flame into a real serious law case, who knows. Will Preet Bharara do the right thing? I hope so."


http://www.hannity.com/articles/election-493995/bombshell-clinton-foundation-witnesses-coming-forward-15023820/




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/26/2016 2:13:11 PM)

Hannity. *snicker*

The dailycaller felches asswipe. then ed klein, a disgraced propagandist known for factless shitbreathing at a gargantuan level, gets the inside scoop from the US attorneys and FBI director (we have been over this form of shitgobbling nutsuckers, didnt happen) and it is all revealed on hannity, another known cockgargler.

Yeah, no.

See pages 1-84 of this thread. No. Uh Uh, felch of the lowest quality.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 5:41:37 AM)

"Hillary Clinton to explain to court who ‘recommended’ secret email account"

quote:

Hillary Clinton will get a chance to explain why she continued to use her secret home email account for government business in defiance of repeated security warnings from her underlings — just some of the 25 questions she’ll have to answer, in writing and under oath, to a federal court.

Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm, submitted the 25 questions to Mrs. Clinton Tuesday, and she now has a month to respond under the procedure set by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

Among the questions are who “recommended” that she use a secret email account in the first place, whether she ever told the officials responsible for archiving records that she had the secret account, and what steps she took after attempts to hack her account.

Mrs. Clinton could also have to answer whether she destroyed work-related emails.

“These are simple questions about her email system that we hope will finally result in straightforward answers, under oath, from Hillary Clinton,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement as he released the 25 questions.

Mrs. Clinton eschewed a state.gov account during her time in office and instead used an account tied to a server she kept at her home in New York. That arrangement effectively thwarted open-records laws and shielded her communications from public view for more than six years.

After prodding by Congress, the State Department demanded she return her emails, and she turned over about 30,000 messages she said were work-related, and said she deleted another 30,000 that were personal — and then wiped her server.

The FBI, after a yearlong investigation, recovered thousands of work-related messages it said Mrs. Clinton failed to turn over, and said there may have been others that investigators were unable to recover thanks to Mrs. Clinton’s thoroughness in wiping the server...

The FBI turned over some 15,000 messages it recovered that it said Mrs. Clinton didn’t turn over to the government. It’s unclear how many of those are personal, but at least several dozen are related to the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack, department lawyers told a federal judge Tuesday.

The State Department is now fending off a barrage of requests to go through the 15,000 messages and release them ahead of the election.

The campaign of GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump said the surfacing of additional Benghazi emails was troubling.

“Hillary Clinton swore before a federal court and told the American people she handed over all of her work-related emails. If Clinton did not consider emails about something as important as Benghazi to be work-related, one has to wonder what is contained in the other emails she attempted to wipe from her server,” said Jason Miller, a spokesman for the campaign.



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/30/clinton-explain-court-recommended-secret-email/




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 5:54:20 AM)

oh dear arent you behind the times? the 25 questions were announced ages ago, or are you just now getting your talking points to share ?

I realise you are totally focussed on your hillary fantasy to decry what is happening with the GOP and the TRumpledforeskin cockwomble but its lovely to know we can always count on your hillaryfemphobia.





mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 6:01:40 AM)

Ah yes, Sun Mung Moon. So, this deposition, do you think her answer will be fuck off, or Vladimir Putin thru Trump recommended it?

Now the nutsuckers are getting to the bottom of the felch bowl, by god.

The FBI never said Mrs. Clinton failed to turn them over. They were found on old servers and in other government backups. They said that.

Now, after twenty five years of hysterical pants shitting propaganda and lies from the nutsuckers and not one wisp of fact or proof of wrongdoing, you think some nutsucker propaganda organ has her zeroed in now?

More asswipe from the nutsuckers, nothing more. The nutsuckers will implode, they will shit their pants, they will smear, and spread their propaganda and felch each other in the various airport bathrooms, and it will give them warm fuzzies for the next 8 years of her presidency.




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 6:04:51 AM)

Their studiously ignoring trumps utter bullshit ,pandering, lies, bigotry, hatred and criminal activity and those of his "surrogates", says EVERYTHING




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 6:06:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Hannity. *snicker*

The dailycaller felches asswipe. then ed klein, a disgraced propagandist known for factless shitbreathing at a gargantuan level, gets the inside scoop from the US attorneys and FBI director (we have been over this form of shitgobbling nutsuckers, didnt happen) and it is all revealed on hannity, another known cockgargler.

Yeah, no.

See pages 1-84 of this thread. No. Uh Uh, felch of the lowest quality.

Shammity is on a slow boat to oblivion, LMAO his town hall with the cockwomble is proof.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 6:17:37 AM)

And I just want to point out the elephant in the room, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

Regarding any military response ... for you nutsucker cowards who are not veterans (so very obviously), every soldier knows the chain of command by rote. Neither Billy Rogers or Hank Kissinger was in my chain of command, they didn't count for shit. And today, the Secy of State is not in the chain of command, they are civilians. In a military operation, a LT might say, Ma'am, step back out of the way, you don't count (cuz they went to school) but a private would say, back the fuck up bitch, or I will blow your goddamn shit away, I have orders. Cuz they didn't go to those schools.

At most, she said stupid shit in meetings that everyone ignored, and wrung her hands and gnashed her teeth, and worried about the people there, and even perhaps how this would look on her resume. But she had no input or effect on military response,

That already is more than any cowardly nutsucker did or has done, or ever will do. They do more like St. Wrinklemeat when 241 marines were killed, skulk away like the fucking cowards they are and talk big, but do not one goddamn thing.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 6:18:04 AM)


Hillary's Lawyers: "She didn't do it and, if she did do it, it wasn't illegal, when she did it and, if it was illegal, when she did it, she did it because no one told her not to, and if someone did tell her not to, Colin Powell did it, too."

That sums it all up, for the last 15 months.



Michael




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 6:19:23 AM)

And it is correct and real. Why don't nutsuckers get it?




klmpong -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 6:27:37 AM)

" and not one wisp of fact or proof of wrongdoing" ????? really????
Just gouge your eyes out now. you obviously have no use for them.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 7:41:10 AM)

he's an impotent broken record AND he's got a hard-on for Hillary, which is ironic given the first part of the sentence.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 7:53:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: klmpong

" and not one wisp of fact or proof of wrongdoing" ????? really????
Just gouge your eyes out now. you obviously have no use for them.

another nutsucker with innuendo, and impugnment but not one scintilla of fact, felch away..........




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 7:55:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

he's an impotent broken record AND he's got a hard-on for Hillary, which is ironic given the first part of the sentence.

you are the impotent broken record, nutsucker, and if you were capable of getting a hardon, it would be hillary.

you are the one that has cockgargled felch for near 90 pages about your factless nutsucker slobber blogs.

Q.E.D.

come out of the closet, my bolshevik friend.




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 12:32:39 PM)

Yet, each of Hillar's lies has been substantiated. But it doesn't seem to matter to the haters that she lies, takes money from Wall Street, and did break national security laws. The haters will fetch away for her.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 12:40:20 PM)

no such things have been substantiated in any way shape or form, there have been no 'lies' that have been demonstrated as 'lies'.

Ronald Reagan and George Shultz violated actual National Security Laws, and nobody gave a fuck.

Seems to me that nutsuckers are tongue deep in wall streets ass and then some.

But nutsuckers felch away.




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (9/1/2016 12:57:23 PM)

You're so funny. No impulse control at all when you're off your meds.




Page: <<   < prev  83 84 [85] 86 87   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125