quote:

With Hillary Clinton’s email scandal continuing to weigh on her campaign, former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom weighed in on the allegations of negotiations between the State Department and the FBI for a ‘quid pro quo’ deal to declassify emails and FBI Director James Comey’s handling of the investigation into the email scandal.

An FBI agent now claims that the State Department’s Undersecretary for Management, Patrick Kennedy, asked him directly to declassify certain Hillary Clinton emails in exchange for FBI posts overseas.

“This is the same guy, Kennedy, that refused all the security requests for Benghazi, this is that same guy,” Kallstrom told the FOX Business Network’s Stuart Varney. [oh no comrades, fox news!]

According to Kallstrom, on the surface the deal looks to be illegal.

“I don’t know enough about the actual deal, but it certainly looks like on paper, you know, something that’s actually a federal crime.”

Kallstrom explained why he felt the investigation into Hilary Clinton’s email scandal was mishandled by FBI Director James Comey.

“He’s [James Comey] let down the citizens of this country in my view, he’s let down the FBI, he’s thrown all the agents under the bus.”

Kallstrom then gave examples of why the probe into Hilary Clinton’s emails was out of character compared to how the FBI usually conducts an investigation.

“There was a point in time when this investigation went into what I would call the sham category. And I could talk for a half an hour on why that is, no grand jury, no subpoenas, no court orders, you know, immunity to the co-conspirators, letting the co-conspirators in on the interview. I mean, these are all crazy things that the FBI never does.”

quote:

Former presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich on Monday broke the Democratic Party code of denial, denial, denial and said that it was the Obama Administration that decided Hillary Clinton would not be indicted, no matter what was revealed by an investigation into her handling of classified emails.

The executive branch “made an early determination that no matter what came up, that there was no way that Hillary Clinton was going to have to be accountable under law to — for anything dealing with the mishandling of classified information.”

Kucinich, who was appearing on Fox [oh no comrades, fox news! maybe you can write dennis Kucinich and ask him to not appear there anymore??], said, “This is a very political process, having very little to do with the scales of justice, and having everything to do with the 2016 presidential election. The Justice Department and the FBI are inevitably a part of the executive branch of government.”

He added, “I will say, it is distressing to see the politicization of the justice system, and the attempt by people in the State Department to try to shade the classified document process in favor of an outcome during the period in which these records were being subpoenaed.”

Distressing, yes, but surprising? Hardly....

How else to explain that, amid the recent deluge of email and video revelations confirming just about everything that’s ever been said or speculated on regarding the Clintons breaking the law, lying to the public and engaging in criminal behavior to get Hillary into the White House, so many voters still think the biggest election issue is that Donald Trump engaged in some locker room talk more than a decade ago?...

As difficult as it is to accept, the hypnotic hold on the minds of liberal voters may just be too powerful for anything to break it.

quote:

...Can’t these hacks even get their bogus narratives straight?

Yet why should they bother? Why should Task Force Pantsuit expend any effort at all trying to construct convincing prevarications when the mainstream media is going to smile and nod at whatever they say? Without resistance, you aren’t going to get any stronger, and Clinton’s lies have just gotten weaker and weaker. For her, lying to the mainstream media is like weightlifting by pumping Styrofoam…

Hillary was a terrible senator, a terrible Secretary of State, and now she’s a terrible candidate, surfing from sinecure to sinecure on a tsunami of lies. But she’s gotten a free pass on her duplicity for so long that she’s not even trying to pass the straight face test anymore. Her loyal minions (and collar space lefties) are so slobberingly committed to her that they don’t even demand that she provide them enough plausible deniability to preserve their few remaining shreds of dignity.

The mainstream media (and collar space lefties) loves Hillary so deeply and without reservation that she can say literally anything to a gaggle of adoring reporters (and collarspace lefties) and absolutely know that they will not only not challenge her, but that her media transcriptionists (and collar space lefties) will swing into action to actively defend her lies should anyone break ranks and dare to point out that the would-be empress has no clothes. No wonder whenever Monica Lewinsky watches CNN, she thinks, “Been there, done that.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, he got his ass handed to him last time he tried to stand toe to toe with intelligent informed factual people, so nutsucker guerrilla terrorist he is.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

He kreeps around, shits and runs off again, he is pathetic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

Wow, what an obsession. 91 pages with no opinion, no citation, all just childish babble.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

apparently Lucy's under the impression that I have some moral obligation, or even interest, in having conversation with her, or vile critter parts, or any of the other comrades whose primary modus operandi is to be insulting?

some insight into that might also be given by her apparent viewing of my posts and posting news and commentary from sources she doesn't appreciate or approve of, as "shitting."

now, she might try to repackage that statement as my simply not conversing with people with whom I disagree, but an earnest search of my posting history would show she is mistaken in that regard also.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

Wow, what an obsession. 91 pages with no opinion, no citation, all just childish babble.

as to the "obsession" part---I went back through the last four months of posts and not counting the times I posted back to back, of the ~61 posts ive made, he was the very next poster in 37 of them and in the 24 posts where he was not the next poster, it was usually lucy, with vile critter parts right behind.

to be fair, sometimes those immediate-reply-posts were in direct response to taunts/challenges/conversation, but most were not.

I wouldn't go so far as to call it stalking, or harassment, but there's certainly something unbecoming going on...