RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/11/2016 8:48:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nobody will say Heil Nutsuckers. And I told you so at the outset. Presidential ambitions are cooked for the century for you boys. Look at your field, they are all inept factless retards.

Your welfare patient checks may not be coming as regularly.

Prescient as well as sick.




WhoreMods -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/11/2016 8:52:21 AM)

FR:
I find the notion of Obama writing Clinton a pardon on his way out hilarious, myself. Smiling while you twist the knife or what?




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/11/2016 9:31:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nobody will say Heil Nutsuckers. And I told you so at the outset. Presidential ambitions are cooked for the century for you boys. Look at your field, they are all inept factless retards.

Your welfare patient checks may not be coming as regularly.

Prescient as well as sick.

And you are moronic as well as retarded. Do you suppose the people are marching in the street with Nutsucker flags?




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/11/2016 9:39:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nobody will say Heil Nutsuckers. And I told you so at the outset. Presidential ambitions are cooked for the century for you boys. Look at your field, they are all inept factless retards.

Your welfare patient checks may not be coming as regularly.

Prescient as well as sick.

And you are moronic as well as retarded. Do you suppose the people are marching in the street with Nutsucker flags?

Lol, what an idiot. What? One hundred people show up in Times Square. How many people in NYC? They are little snowflakes and paid hacks. Just as they were paid hacks protesting Trump. Bussed in. That's who your sick little mind is counting on now. Counting on for what is the question, but then we know enough about your sick mind we don't need to know more now.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/11/2016 10:48:32 AM)

LOL, what a sick, reprehensible, slobbering nutsucker fucking retard you are. Think about how sick your fucking minds are to propagate lies to throw your felchings in a non-reprehensible light.

Only 100 people. Yeah, then why are you felgobblers felching over it and starting 100s of threads on it, one for each marcher?




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/11/2016 10:59:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, what a sick, reprehensible, slobbering nutsucker fucking retard you are. Think about how sick your fucking minds are to propagate lies to throw your felchings in a non-reprehensible light.

Only 100 people. Yeah, then why are you felgobblers felching over it and starting 100s of threads on it, one for each marcher?

Well to be very honest with you, the global hench of felching fegobblers met and decided to make your life miserable. From all over the world they are now going to target your thoughts.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/11/2016 11:53:35 AM)

LOL, fantastic, treating you fucking sick felgobbling nutsuckers with the derision you so righfully deserve makes me giggle like a 9 year old school girl. "Be very honest. . . " LOL. You nutsuckers felchgobbling crack me up.




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/11/2016 11:58:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, fantastic, treating you fucking sick felgobbling nutsuckers with the derision you so righfully deserve makes me giggle like a 9 year old school girl. "Be very honest. . . " LOL. You nutsuckers felchgobbling crack me up.

Well, a 9-year old is your speed. Just remember no touchy.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 6:37:48 AM)

"Trump administration could mean new life for Clinton Foundation probe"

quote:

Washington (CNN)The FBI has spent more than a year looking into the Clinton Foundation without getting beyond the starting gates. That could soon change.

Investigators at the FBI's New York office, who unsuccessfully argued for months that they should be allowed to open a full-blown investigation of the foundation, could find a more friendly audience in a Donald Trump administration Justice Department.

The President-elect railed during the closing weeks of the campaign against the relationship between foundation donors and Hillary Clinton's work in government as "corrupt."

He promised there would more investigations of the Clintons if he were elected.

Soon, top officials he appoints at the Justice Department will have the power make that happen.

And the FBI investigators may have more ammunition to make their case with stolen emails from Clinton aides released in recent weeks by WikiLeaks.

The emails showed internal fights over the foundation between Chelsea Clinton and a top aide to her father, Doug Band, who helped run the foundation. Chelsea Clinton, according to the emails, was concerned about possible conflicts of interest and problems related to Bill Clinton's paid speech-making business, dubbed "Bill Clinton Inc." The dispute prompted the foundation to conduct an internal audit of its activities. Band hit back at Chelsea Clinton, according to the emails, suggesting she used the foundation to pay for her wedding.

Rudy Giuliani, considered a contender for attorney general or other top cabinet post, according to people familiar with Trump transition planning, said Thursday that the new president will have to make a decision on what to do about his promises to hire a special prosecutor to investigate matters related to Clinton.

"It's been a tradition in our politics to put things behind us," Giuliani said on CNN's "New Day." "On the other hand, you have to look at how bad was it? Because suppose somebody comes along a year from now and is alleged to have stolen $50,000 from a charity -- and (Clinton) was never investigated for hundreds of millions."

Messages left with the Clinton Foundation seeking comment were not returned.

Career prosecutors at the Justice Department's criminal division and the public integrity section, as well as lawyers at the FBI, reviewed the requests earlier this year from FBI investigators to launch a full probe of the Clinton Foundation, according to law enforcement officials briefed on the discussions. The agents were told that they didn't have enough evidence to use more overt investigative methods, including seeking subpoenas, to open a full probe, the officials said. They were also told they could continue to gather information and revisit their requests if they found more evidence.

The genesis of the FBI efforts date, in part, to allegations published in the 2015 book "Clinton Cash" by conservative writer Peter Schweizer.

Agents were unhappy at being told they didn't have enough evidence, and that fed some of the tensions over Clinton-related matters inside the FBI in recent months between the New York field office and FBI headquarters, law enforcement officials say.

Trump repeatedly referred to the WikiLeaks emails -- in particular the issues raised by Band -- as proof that investigators should take a deeper look.

"Mr. Band called the arrangement unorthodox. The rest of us call it outright corrupt," Trump told an October campaign rally. "In fact, the Clinton Foundation even hired a law firm to find out if their pay to play scheme would jeopardize their charitable status with the IRS."

Trying to use the stolen emails released by WikiLeaks to try to build probable cause for further investigation could present legal hurdles for the FBI and the Justice Department.

At least some of the emails are labeled as "attorney-client privileged," meaning they have the legal protection of confidential communications between lawyer and client.

And then there's the fact the US government has declared that the emails were stolen by Russian intelligence in a cyber-hack of the email account of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.

Earlier this year, prosecutors in Manhattan US Attorney Preet Bharara's office used revelations from the Panama Papers, stolen and leaked legal documents from a law firm in that country that helped the rich create offshore financial shelters, as cause to issue subpoenas to individuals and firms named in the documents. Other lawyers at Justice Department headquarters debated whether the stolen materials could be used predicates for an investigation.


http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/politics/donald-trump-clinton-foundation/index.html




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 6:50:35 AM)

LOL. Wonder if he will be impeached for his university fraud or for his charity fraud first?




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 6:58:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nobody will say Heil Nutsuckers. And I told you so at the outset. Presidential ambitions are cooked for the century for you boys. Look at your field, they are all inept factless retards.

Your welfare patient checks may not be coming as regularly.

Time sure flies doesn't it.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 7:08:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nobody will say Heil Nutsuckers. And I told you so at the outset. Presidential ambitions are cooked for the century for you boys. Look at your field, they are all inept factless retards.

Your welfare patient checks may not be coming as regularly.

Time sure flies doesn't it.

It sure does. Nobody is saying Heil Nutsuckers, they are still inept factless retards, and your welfare patient checks will probably not come as regularly.

I may have missed this or that prediction, but the core is there.





Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 7:15:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nobody will say Heil Nutsuckers. And I told you so at the outset. Presidential ambitions are cooked for the century for you boys. Look at your field, they are all inept factless retards.

Your welfare patient checks may not be coming as regularly.

Time sure flies doesn't it.

Ya, there were a couple of others on here guaranteeing Hillary would win. It lets you know who the real felchers are. The ones that can't think past hack kool aid distribution. The interesting thing is, if they'd say something like, "I would have never believed it, but it happened," they'd at least sound like they could think now. But, of course, they have no thought.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 7:47:31 AM)

we know the nutsuckers are the felchers. I never believed it could happen, it did. I never believed there would be a deplorable turnout, I never believed that there should be an electoral college, I never believed that people would vote for 'change' as a word without considering that change.

They are going to get change, there will not be a post office in the united states not named after st. wrinklemeat, there will be a huge military industrial complex with toys aplenty that the military neither needs nor wants, and the citizenry will be forgotten, and the corporations will receive tax breaks to put their jobs overseas, and their profits, while requiring the citizenry to go to war to protect them. Yanno, taxation without representation.




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 10:28:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

we know the nutsuckers are the felchers. I never believed it could happen, it did. I never believed there would be a deplorable turnout, I never believed that there should be an electoral college, I never believed that people would vote for 'change' as a word without considering that change.

They are going to get change, there will not be a post office in the united states not named after st. wrinklemeat, there will be a huge military industrial complex with toys aplenty that the military neither needs nor wants, and the citizenry will be forgotten, and the corporations will receive tax breaks to put their jobs overseas, and their profits, while requiring the citizenry to go to war to protect them. Yanno, taxation without representation.

When you say vote for "Change" as a word, you're referring to 2008. I'm pretty sure Trump enumerated the change he intended. I'm equally sure that Hillary never said anything that wasn't focus group tested, so never said anything.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 2:03:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, fantastic, treating you fucking sick felgobbling nutsuckers with the derision you so righfully deserve makes me giggle like a 9 year old school girl. "Be very honest. . . " LOL. You nutsuckers felchgobbling crack me up.

Well, a 9-year old is your speed. Just remember no touchy.

Tell that to your nutsucker friends and your president, seems you are not facile with the thing.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 2:04:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

we know the nutsuckers are the felchers. I never believed it could happen, it did. I never believed there would be a deplorable turnout, I never believed that there should be an electoral college, I never believed that people would vote for 'change' as a word without considering that change.

They are going to get change, there will not be a post office in the united states not named after st. wrinklemeat, there will be a huge military industrial complex with toys aplenty that the military neither needs nor wants, and the citizenry will be forgotten, and the corporations will receive tax breaks to put their jobs overseas, and their profits, while requiring the citizenry to go to war to protect them. Yanno, taxation without representation.

When you say vote for "Change" as a word, you're referring to 2008. I'm pretty sure Trump enumerated the change he intended. I'm equally sure that Hillary never said anything that wasn't focus group tested, so never said anything.

Nope, the change as a word was what the nutsuckers voted for, they have done everything to obstruct change. I am talking about what I am talking about, and you of course are felchgobbling as you nutsuckers are wont to do.





Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 5:03:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

we know the nutsuckers are the felchers. I never believed it could happen, it did. I never believed there would be a deplorable turnout, I never believed that there should be an electoral college, I never believed that people would vote for 'change' as a word without considering that change.

They are going to get change, there will not be a post office in the united states not named after st. wrinklemeat, there will be a huge military industrial complex with toys aplenty that the military neither needs nor wants, and the citizenry will be forgotten, and the corporations will receive tax breaks to put their jobs overseas, and their profits, while requiring the citizenry to go to war to protect them. Yanno, taxation without representation.

When you say vote for "Change" as a word, you're referring to 2008. I'm pretty sure Trump enumerated the change he intended. I'm equally sure that Hillary never said anything that wasn't focus group tested, so never said anything.

Nope, the change as a word was what the nutsuckers voted for, they have done everything to obstruct change. I am talking about what I am talking about, and you of course are felchgobbling as you nutsuckers are wont to do.



Yepers, you are only talking about what you are talking about because you're the only one hearing the voices. Everyone else heard "Hope and Change" in 2007. You must have been in another universe at the time.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 5:22:08 PM)

never mind the gobbledygook of that somehow the "nutsuckers" paradoxically voted for "change" and then "did everything to obstruct it?"

in English it might look something like "nutsuckers" voted for trump because he represented a change, yet obstructed Obama even though he represented change.

as if thats a meaningful criticism of some sort.

of course im just theorizing--I don't speak gobbledygook (although watch vile critter parts try to pick up on that one.)




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/12/2016 7:13:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL. Wonder if he will be impeached for his university fraud or for his charity fraud first?

No




Page: <<   < prev  95 96 [97] 98 99   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625