joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:
ORIGINAL: captive4ever
Whatever the argument is, surely the fact that the source is The Washington Times makes it all a bit moot.
Except that the source for the story is not The Washington Times. Its coverage was just a reprise of reporting by CBS News, the Los Angeles Times, and 89.3 KPCC. The hidden clues to this possibly obscure fact can be found buried in subtle phrases like, "a local CBS affiliate reported," "CBS reported," "the Los Angeles Times reported," "KPCC reported," etc., with the accompanying links concealed behind pretty colored letters. Yes, I know. Tricky shit, eh?
Oh, because it states somewhere that 'X' is true, so therefore 'X' must be true? If that was true, than the whole birther and truther issues from 2008 would have died off in the first three weeks among conservatives.....
....Yet we still have them today!
Because I made the argument that you either skipped over or didn't read.....
If what this 'journalist' stated is true, why has law enforcement not picked up either individual for questioning? Doesn't that sound....a bit....unusual? Given that these two would be in a building that is right next to the police station? This doesn't strike as just....a little....odd?
Where is the evidence?
That's the question. Conservative media rushed to push the story without showing the evidence. They are accusing two individuals of something without evidence. Do you not understand this basic concept?
When have you known me....NOT....to read an article for discussion? That should have been your first understanding. The second, is that I would have looked up the links from the article itself. The third, that I would look else where to see what other sites say about the subject matter. That I stated most conservative sites used the same bullshit without presenting evidence, while none of the liberal/moderate sites had a piece. That should have clued you in that I performed step number three in the process. Which therefore means I followed step one and two.
You would have known that, had you been following along instead of trying to think of someway to insult me. Because in trying to think of 'that one insult', you actually insulted yourself. I'm just going to point it out to you now (everyone else knows it even before the previous sentence): Your a moron!
|
RE: California city council appoints two illegal immigr... - 
Profile
.gif){kind=avatar}
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread