EPA WATERWAYS RULE PUT ON HOLD

EPA WATERWAYS RULE PUT ON HOLD (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

KenDckey -> EPA WATERWAYS RULE PUT ON HOLD (8/27/2015 4:41:42 PM)
http://news.yahoo.com/judge-blocks-federal-rule-jurisdiction-waterways-210258822.html Fed judge put a stop on waterways rule for a while. EPA to appeal I am sure.

Thegunnysez -> RE: EPA WATERWAYS RULE PUT ON HOLD (8/27/2015 5:18:13 PM)
From the cited article. quote: The new rules would have forced landowners to get a permit if they took steps that would pollute or destroy the regulated waters connected to larger bodies of water downstream.

KenDckey -> RE: EPA WATERWAYS RULE PUT ON HOLD (8/27/2015 5:37:03 PM)
One possible item. if you have rain, and the rain is of sufficient power to overflow your property and joins other rain running into a stream or wash, then you would be regulated under that statement. So anyone in a flood plain might be considered needing a permit for their water regardless of how they normally get it or periodically use it (pool, grass, treets, etc). I know that when it rains in phoenix, the water from the rain runs into rivers that are considered navagatable waterways.

Sanity -> RE: EPA WATERWAYS RULE PUT ON HOLD (8/27/2015 5:40:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Thegunnysez From the cited article. quote: The new rules would have forced landowners to get a permit if they took steps that would pollute or destroy the regulated waters connected to larger bodies of water downstream. In other words, the EPA is trying to give itself the power to micromanage everything you do on your own land

Thegunnysez -> RE: EPA WATERWAYS RULE PUT ON HOLD (8/27/2015 6:06:51 PM)
quote: In other words, the EPA is trying to give itself the power to micromanage everything you do on your own land What I posted did not say that

Thegunnysez -> RE: EPA WATERWAYS RULE PUT ON HOLD (8/27/2015 6:08:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KenDckey One possible item. if you have rain, and the rain is of sufficient power to overflow your property and joins other rain running into a stream or wash, then you would be regulated under that statement. So anyone in a flood plain might be considered needing a permit for their water regardless of how they normally get it or periodically use it (pool, grass, treets, etc). I know that when it rains in phoenix, the water from the rain runs into rivers that are considered navagatable waterways. What I posted did not say that.

KenDckey -> RE: EPA WATERWAYS RULE PUT ON HOLD (8/27/2015 6:36:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Thegunnysez quote: ORIGINAL: KenDckey One possible item. if you have rain, and the rain is of sufficient power to overflow your property and joins other rain running into a stream or wash, then you would be regulated under that statement. So anyone in a flood plain might be considered needing a permit for their water regardless of how they normally get it or periodically use it (pool, grass, treets, etc). I know that when it rains in phoenix, the water from the rain runs into rivers that are considered navagatable waterways. What I posted did not say that. Like I said, one possible. Sorry you didn't understand that.

Thegunnysez -> RE: EPA WATERWAYS RULE PUT ON HOLD (8/27/2015 6:41:40 PM)
quote: Like I said, one possible. Sorry you didn't understand that. "The new rules would have forced landowners to get a permit if they took steps that would pollute or destroy the regulated waters connected to larger bodies of water downstream." Rainwater, no matter what porportions, has anything to do with "if they took steps"

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125