RE: statistical impossibility (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Politesub53 -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/18/2015 4:26:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

And yet other posters understood what he was saying. But go ahead and blame him for your lack of reading comprehension. I'm sure no one would expect you to admit you might have made a mistake.


Still trolling then boi ?

Get back to me when you ever make a post that does anything else, such as something radical, like an original thought or the like.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/18/2015 5:02:31 PM)

I read the whole article and a couple of others on the subject.
It appears that a very intelligent christian girl in Egypt somehow managed to flunk 7 tests to the extent that she scored a big fat zero for all of them.
The parents are claiming it's a cheat because the handwriting on the test paper doesn't match.

Statistically, it's not impossible, but very highly unlikely. The title of the thread is misleading.
That would imply that something was amiss somewhere unless she deliberately flunked it as a personal protest for whatever reason. This happens - I've seen it and witnessed it first hand here in the UK.

Given the predominance of the one particular religion in the region that puts her into a small minority, I would say it's more likely the 'cheating' was done by another pupil or the teacher rather than the government.

However you look at it - it sucks, and deserves a proper investigation into exactly what happened.
The whole region is corrupt from the floor to the top.
This is just one example that happened to hit the international headlines.




thishereboi -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/19/2015 2:46:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

And yet other posters understood what he was saying. But go ahead and blame him for your lack of reading comprehension. I'm sure no one would expect you to admit you might have made a mistake.


Still trolling then boi ?

Get back to me when you ever make a post that does anything else, such as something radical, like an original thought or the like.



When I reply to someone who has something intelligent to say, I might try that. But right now I am responding to you who never does.




thompsonx -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/19/2015 5:32:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

The whole region is corrupt from the floor to the top.
This is just one example that happened to hit the international headlines.



Are we speaking of new jersey or cairo?




DesideriScuri -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/19/2015 11:03:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
LMAO!!! What the fuck is up with you?!? He stated it's a statistical impossibility for a top ranked student to get 0% on 7 tests. Surely you can understand that would mean he thought there was some sort of foul play going on, can't you?
IOW, in his analysis of the article, there had to be some sort of cheating going on because it's just not possible for that gal to get a 0% on 7 tests. The "another mind wasted" comment was very likely directly commenting on the claims by her parents (which were in the article) that her goals and aspirations have been dashed by this cheating.

Reading his drivel, I have long since given up understanding what he meant. If he felt there was an important point to be made (and there clearly is) he should have just said so.

I gotcha now. You didn't read for understanding. You just read the article and assumed his stance.
Next time, you might want to read for understanding, Ps.

No you havent got me, you are not that bright. My posts have been clear enough.


The turd I just flushed is bright enough to get you. It doesn't take much. It's true your posts have been clear enough. You've stated that you don't read for understanding of what he's posting. Thus, you have to respond according to what you assume his point is.

This time, that strategy failed you.




Politesub53 -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/19/2015 4:34:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

The turd I just flushed is bright enough to get you. It doesn't take much. It's true your posts have been clear enough. You've stated that you don't read for understanding of what he's posting. Thus, you have to respond according to what you assume his point is.

This time, that strategy failed you.



I love how many of you on the right hate having your stupidity pointed out to you. The fact remains the title of the thread and the OP are misleading, as i pointed out in post #2. You, boi and others can sling all the shit you like, it wont alter that fact one iota.




Kirata -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/19/2015 10:22:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

if it helps knowing, I have you on hide, but unfortunately get to see your inane patter when someone else quotes you. you couldn't even get the reason for my questioning about "superiority" correct in your retort to me.

Hopefully someone posts this...

You can join the list of other pricks who claim to have me on hide yet continue to make snidey digs.

Done. I shortened it a bit, heh, but I agree with your point. When you put someone on Hide, their hands are tied behind their back if you choose to abuse them. They can't respond. It's bullying. Bad form.

K.







bounty44 -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 4:34:29 AM)

I think that's a good point kirata and youre right...

and in that regard misnamed in uk, i shouldn't do it, and I apologize for that.




thompsonx -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 11:34:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
When you put someone on Hide, their hands are tied behind their back if you choose to abuse them. They can't respond. It's bullying. Bad form.

K.


When someone puts me on hide it is as if they have put up a "kick me" sign and has a firm grip on their ankles.  I am willing to practice my "field goal" kicks until such time as they  grow a pair and feel like turning around and facing me.




thompsonx -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 11:37:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

I think that's a good point kirata and youre right...

and in that regard misnamed in uk, i shouldn't do it, and I apologize for that.


Wow! that was pretty kewel[;)].




thompsonx -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 11:45:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

I read the whole article and a couple of others on the subject.
It appears that a very intelligent christian girl in Egypt somehow managed to flunk 7 tests to the extent that she scored a big fat zero for all of them.
The parents are claiming it's a cheat because the handwriting on the test paper doesn't match.

Statistically, it's not impossible, but very highly unlikely. The title of the thread is misleading.
That would imply that something was amiss somewhere unless she deliberately flunked it as a personal protest for whatever reason. This happens - I've seen it and witnessed it first hand here in the UK.

Given the predominance of the one particular religion in the region that puts her into a small minority, I would say it's more likely the 'cheating' was done by another pupil or the teacher rather than the government.

However you look at it - it sucks, and deserves a proper investigation into exactly what happened.
The whole region is corrupt from the floor to the top.
This is just one example that happened to hit the international headlines.



The article was pretty clear that in the beginning they thought it was some "christian bashing" but according to the article they found less evidence of christian bashing and more evidence of bribery and corruption. Luckily for this bint she is getting a lot of "face time" over this and things are not looking so cloudy as they did at first. Yes she got "sand bagged" but looks like  she will catch a good bounce on this one.
Corruption is everywhere...did you know any one at university who would write a paper for you for a price?
 




DesideriScuri -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 1:24:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
The turd I just flushed is bright enough to get you. It doesn't take much. It's true your posts have been clear enough. You've stated that you don't read for understanding of what he's posting. Thus, you have to respond according to what you assume his point is.
This time, that strategy failed you.

I love how many of you on the right hate having your stupidity pointed out to you. The fact remains the title of the thread and the OP are misleading, as i pointed out in post #2. You, boi and others can sling all the shit you like, it wont alter that fact one iota.


I think my sons' turds this morning are smarter than you.

You did not understand what the OP was saying at all. You even admit to not reading him for understanding.

In case you forgot about it, there is this thing in the English language called "hyperbole." You should look it up and then look at the subject again.




Politesub53 -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 3:50:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

if it helps knowing, I have you on hide, but unfortunately get to see your inane patter when someone else quotes you. you couldn't even get the reason for my questioning about "superiority" correct in your retort to me.

Hopefully someone posts this...

You can join the list of other pricks who claim to have me on hide yet continue to make snidey digs.

Done. I shortened it a bit, heh, but I agree with your point. When you put someone on Hide, their hands are tied behind their back if you choose to abuse them. They can't respond. It's bullying. Bad form.

K.






You are not in the real world my friend. Bounty started this spat and someone else who claims to have me on hide often piggybacks silly comments about me. Its quite simple to work out who is the bully and who isnt.




Politesub53 -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 3:52:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
The turd I just flushed is bright enough to get you. It doesn't take much. It's true your posts have been clear enough. You've stated that you don't read for understanding of what he's posting. Thus, you have to respond according to what you assume his point is.
This time, that strategy failed you.

I love how many of you on the right hate having your stupidity pointed out to you. The fact remains the title of the thread and the OP are misleading, as i pointed out in post #2. You, boi and others can sling all the shit you like, it wont alter that fact one iota.


I think my sons' turds this morning are smarter than you.

You did not understand what the OP was saying at all. You even admit to not reading him for understanding.

In case you forgot about it, there is this thing in the English language called "hyperbole." You should look it up and then look at the subject again.



Lmfao....get back to me when you understand what English is, because it certainly isnt your strong suit.




Politesub53 -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 3:55:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

I think that's a good point kirata and youre right...

and in that regard misnamed in uk, i shouldn't do it, and I apologize for that.


Yet you still have the sly dig re my username... Its just the same old passive agressive bullshit from you.

Yes, I am aware you cant see this. [8|]




angelikaJ -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 5:54:27 PM)

FR

FFS, if I didn't know any better I would think that the majority of this argument was being put forth by high school debate teams who are desperately trying to lose on purpose.

Maybe it's time to try a different raison d'etre.




thompsonx -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 5:59:27 PM)

quote:

Maybe it's time to try a different raison d'etre.


Must you suck all the joy out of my life?




DesideriScuri -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 6:26:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
The turd I just flushed is bright enough to get you. It doesn't take much. It's true your posts have been clear enough. You've stated that you don't read for understanding of what he's posting. Thus, you have to respond according to what you assume his point is.
This time, that strategy failed you.

I love how many of you on the right hate having your stupidity pointed out to you. The fact remains the title of the thread and the OP are misleading, as i pointed out in post #2. You, boi and others can sling all the shit you like, it wont alter that fact one iota.

I think my sons' turds this morning are smarter than you.
You did not understand what the OP was saying at all. You even admit to not reading him for understanding.
In case you forgot about it, there is this thing in the English language called "hyperbole." You should look it up and then look at the subject again.

Lmfao....get back to me when you understand what English is, because it certainly isnt your strong suit.


Uh huh. Logic and understanding aren't yours.




Wayward5oul -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 6:33:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Maybe it's time to try a different raison d'etre.


Must you suck all the joy out of my life?


This is not the oral sex thread. Pay attention.




thompsonx -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/20/2015 6:44:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

This is not the oral sex thread. Pay attention.


You are kinda bossy




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875