joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 I liked rick perry so in that regard, its sort of a shame, but at the same time, I think there's too many people running and am a little glad for the winnowing. Mr. Perry is something of an oddity, even for Texas! He has his good points and a few major flubs that cost him his chances the first time around. Apparently, conservatives are more happy about someone with no substance (i.e. Mr. Trump) than Mr. Perry. In a race of so many, Mr. Perry was not in my top three likely candidates to face off to Mrs. Clinton. Before Mr. Trump rose in the race, I was thinking the likely candidate to be Mr. Walker, Mr. Cruz, or Mr. Bush. Now, its just Mr. Trump and Mr. Bush for the nomination. quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 dana perino (major crush) was just suggesting similarly, and that if after the next "debate", the candidates aren't in the top ten, they'd do well to drop out also. Why should anyone drop out? Isn't an American freedom to say you wish to be a US President and why? If they think they have the right ideas for the nation, they should keep up the good fight. All the way to the election! Make seperate political parties if they have to. Better question: Why does a person need a political party to run for President? Couldn't their name appear on a line without some party just under/beside it? (Question is open to anyone, not just Bounty). quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 greg gutfeld was expressing some dismay at having so many people and not being able to hear what they think more in depth because the coverage is necessarily limited. That is just plain bullshit. We have this technology called 'The Internet'. Just google the candidate and look at their website. Here is my issue, that is similar to Mr. Gutfeld, but not due to lack of an internet connection. The candidates themselves do not publish any real solid information. Yes, I understand each of them think immigration sucks. Yet, they do not give a comprehensive idea on how a solution should be shaped. That most of them want a wall between the four southern states and Mexico. How is this wall-system designed? What sort of manpower is needed? How much equipment will be used? How much will this cost to create initially and per year afterward? What is the benefit for the other 46 states? Some of whom share a nation border with Canada? Or those states that handle international shipping like Massachusetts, North Carolina, and Oregon? By this point nearly eight years ago, then Sen. Obama, was giving the nation his ideas on healthcare. There were several ideas floating around as to what all might be included. The ideas had structure to them already. Some were concepts from the GOP just years earlier. Some had their origins from the Democrats. And others were Mr. Obama and/or his supporter's ideas fleshed out. So where is the demand from conservatives towards this candidates to release some solid information? You would have me believe Mr. Trump can not afford a sixty person group to create a prototype immigration and southern border security plan?
|