RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies

RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

LookieNoNookie -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (9/24/2015 5:19:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact Have fun with that. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

EmbrunMurphyCPL -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/4/2015 12:37:04 PM)
Nothing wrong with that if that's what they're into. I am a bisexual white male who likes cross-dressing and my wife S. is supportive.

dreamlady -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/6/2015 5:25:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: EmbrunMurphyCPL Nothing wrong with that if that's what they're into. I am a bisexual white male who likes cross-dressing and my wife S. is supportive. Umm, yes there is a whole shitload wrong with OP's manifesto approach to posting. 1. Not every man who cross-dresses sees himself as a sissy. Not every sissy is bisexual either. 2. "Forced Fem" is not the same as "Forced Bi" -- It can be, but they don't necessarily go hand in hand. 3. Whatever your preferences are, and those of your bisexual wife (not sure which one of you is the switch and which one is the slave since your profile lists you both as an m/m couple), chances are that you don't fit OP's bill. quote: ORIGINAL: DommeVictoria213 Encouraging male homosexuality is key to creating a sissy. OP is free to clarify herself further, but I take her opening statement to mean that she gets off on turning straight men into non-hetero sissies. 4. Since you are already bisexual, you wouldn't qualify since you are not her targeted demographic. quote: ORIGINAL: DommeVictoria213 The dominant woman will take every opportunity to plant gay longings in her target. 5. Now, them there's fighting words -- these triggered an unassailably negative reaction. OP thinks she can define what Dominant women could, would and should be doing, as a self-ordained FemDom spokeswoman. [8\|] Nowhere else to go but downhill from here on out. quote: ORIGINAL: DommeVictoria213 She should watch the sexual activity and actively approve as the sissies fondle and suck each other. 6. Say What??? OP has the audacity to tell this group of Dommes what we should or should not be doing with our own subs??? Bitch done lost her mind. 7. "Actively approve"? Are we a freaking cheerleading squad on the sidelines? 8. This is no kind of show of dominance whatsoever but, rather, Exhibit A of FemDom Porn 101 for fakey acts of male submission and fakey acts of FemDom permission-granting by "forcing" supposedly straight men to engage in performing sex acts with one another that they secretly want to engage in anyway. 9. Ergo, whose manipulative hidden agenda is being followed by whom? Sounds an awfully lot like a business plan to me, having everything to do with attracting more clientèle , and very little to do with the D/s dynamic between Mistresses and their male submissives. (And I don't believe you and your wife are looking for a poly business arrangement, or becoming part of some whack-job's masturbatory experiment. Mutual disqualification.) DreamLady Edit - typo

JVoV -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/6/2015 7:30:56 AM)
^^^^ all those words.... U will never be a twu dominate. Hopeless.

Wayward5oul -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/6/2015 7:49:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV ^^^^ all those words.... U will never be a twu dominate. Hopeless. Dude, typo. You forgot to capitalize "Dominate". That's just disrespectful to twu Dominates.

Lucylastic -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/6/2015 8:00:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Chrisp7135 I visit here for the intellectual conversations, but stay for the humor. chris LOL

JVoV -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/6/2015 8:30:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV ^^^^ all those words.... U will never be a twu dominate. Hopeless. Dude, typo. You forgot to capitalize "Dominate". That's just disrespectful to twu Dominates. If I had a cooch, you'd be running from it screaming for such insolence. [:@]

Wayward5oul -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/6/2015 3:57:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV If I had a cooch [:@] I'd give my right nut to see that.

SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/6/2015 7:59:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DommeVictoria213 Encouraging male homosexuality is key to creating a sissy. The dominant woman will take every opportunity to plant gay longings in her target. She should watch the sexual activity and actively approve as the sissies fondle and suck each other. This video illustrates the concept beautifully: http://xhamster.com/movies/3161657/amateur_crossdressers_fuck_while_wife_watching.html Smdh. I actually pegged the OP for late teens to mid 20's agewise. I wasn't far off. For a first post you aren't starting off on the best of footings. Waltzing in and telling other Dominant Women what they should be doing isn't a great idea at any time, any where. But especially not here. Now if you had stumbled in and said "here is what I like to do to get My sissy bitch to do whatever blah blah blah" you might have gotten a bit more of a thoughtful discussion, a whole lot of laughter still, but at least a few nuggets of wisdom as well. I'm a Cuckoldress, as are a few others here, and there is so much " Nope" in this starting comment that frankly, I can't even take you seriously. Not in any way. SMDH...ugh

DesFIP -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/6/2015 9:25:10 PM)
The op shows her ignorance. You cannot change a person's sexual orientation. You can change behavior but not personality. And cross dressers are not necessarily interested in being sissified.

SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/7/2015 1:43:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesFIP The op shows her ignorance. You cannot change a person's sexual orientation. You can change behavior but not personality. And cross dressers are not necessarily interested in being sissified. Absolutely correct on all points. Adding in even My cucks that did perform certain same sex sexual acts would not be defined as homosexual in my book.

dreamlady -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/7/2015 9:15:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV ^^^^ all those words.... U will never be a twu dominate. Hopeless. Dude, typo. You forgot to capitalize "Dominate". That's just disrespectful to twu Dominates. So J, you didn't know that one of my specialties is verbal[/mental] Domination? I'll talk your (plural) ear off while you get a tongue lashing. When I sit you down to give you [yet] a[nother] lecture, you'll be begging for a beating instead. [8D] No, I'm not usually the arrogant sort (those damned okcupid personality bargraphs lie!), but I can match opinionated arrogance with opinionated arrogance. (Hmm, it almost comes naturally to me.) Btw, I don't expect you to know this, but I have to confess that I am not a twu D/dominate. Don't even have a Master Card to laminate. I tried calling myself a switch for 6 months, but that just caused a bunch of confusion over on the other (profile) side. Evidently, saying you're a Domme-leaning switch throws kinky men into a loop. Especially when you clearly state that you're not a Top, you're not looking for a Top, and you don't bottom. That Interests list is mighty ambiguous, and nobody knows what to make of it. Some BDSM-y things I couldn't list because it could be taken the wrong way, or as not being bidirectional; other things I had to list in a different category than I wanted to as a kind of compromise. It's straightened out now that I reclassified myself recently as a Dominant woman, but still don't like to use the term Domme or FemDom. (I'm okay with Mistress, but not generically to just any Tom, Dick & Harry s-type.) As unbelievable as this might sound, I got tired of having to over-explain myself. (Like right now) SDFemDom4cuck, you raise an interesting point. Some guys are bicurious, but once they've dipped their toe into the water, they discover that they're not into other guys. Others find their twu calling in life or else can reconcile themselves to being heteroflexible with the right partner. I can say with absolute certainty that if I hadn't dabbled a couple times in the ladies pond a really long time ago, I wouldn't know beyond the shadow of a doubt that I am not attracted to women and have no desire to explore my sexuality with them. Chalk it up to adolescent horniness. Also, we gals were more open to same-sex experimentation without as much inhibition or laying a guilt trip upon ourselves for it as most guys do. Then there's the fear factor. Females don't ordinarily live in fear of getting raped and/or molested by one another (by men, yes, but not by other women). I have a friend who served in Iraq, and he admitted that this was a constant fear and source of anxiety. He woke up once with some soldier dude sucking his dick, and he was so pissed off that he almost beat the living daylights out of that drunk dude. DreamLady

SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/8/2015 1:53:25 PM)
@Dreamlady I just don't consider performing a sexual act at the behest of another the equivalent to defining their sexuality. An act is an act. Neither would have gone out on their own and actively sucked c*ck for their own pleasure. Yet, after the acceptance of their place, they did not hesitate. Still did not have anything to do with their natural sexuality. I did not see them as homosexual, nor did they. It was simply an act they performed for my enjoyment. Because at its root, for Me, submission and service are about doing the things you abhor the most, along with the things that drive you crazy, in order to please another person. Just My .02

dreamlady -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/9/2015 4:16:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SDFemDom4cuck @Dreamlady I just don't consider performing a sexual act at the behest of another the equivalent to defining their sexuality. An act is an act. Neither would have gone out on their own and actively sucked c*ck for their own pleasure. Yet, after the acceptance of their place, they did not hesitate. Still did not have anything to do with their natural sexuality. I did not see them as homosexual, nor did they. It was simply an act they performed for my enjoyment. Because at its root, for Me, submission and service are about doing the things you abhor the most, along with the things that drive you crazy, in order to please another person. Just My .02 Understood, and we each have our own style of domination and submission. What works for one doesn't always work for another. I think that if a sub wanting to become your cuck (if you have more than one besides your primary partner) told you that he was into "forced" bi, that would ruin this particular dynamic of yours as you have described it. It would have nothing to do with submitting to your wishes (or whims!) and being of service to you in the manner that you would want him to be. In all fairness, perhaps this is also what motivates the OP, although she didn't express it quite in those terms. Much like the in-your-face fin-Domme casting her net for more paypiggies, she also came across in Mack truck proportions. Whenever that happens, those who are not within that circle of consensuality will feel a sense of outrage because it FEELS like a violation of consent. The problem with a lot of young and/or inexperienced Dominants (who are mainly Tops wanting the prestige or desirability of being called a Dominant/Master-Mistress) is that the lines of role play get blurred for them. Some of them are convinced that these fantasy constructs are for real. They are faking it until making it - often for years and years, or even indefinitely - but unfortunately in the process of doing so, they can cause a great deal of damage and destruction in their wake. Both to others and to self. DreamLady

lthrpup -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/9/2015 9:00:23 AM)
I think my opinion falls about halfway between those of DreamLady and SDFemDom4cuck, but I can't figure out whether there is enough room between their positions for both me and another guy or just me :-)

SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/9/2015 1:46:20 PM)
Exactly Dream Lady! Just as I'm sure there are as numerous different opinions on it by each of us. That is the beauty of it all. The differences. However I agree that sometimes the more inexperienced of Dommes get a little over excited and run amok proclaiming all sorts of stuff in their excitement that can do more harm than good. I don't know that age really makes a difference. I've seen the same in your face omnipotence in "Dommes" twice the OPs age who were just discovering their power. Perhaps the OP was simply out casting her net for clients here on the Mistress Board. Given her lack of response it seems she is less interested in discussing/defending her viewpoint or learning and more interested in setting out bait. The unfortunate part is that the OP's kind of attitude is what perpetuates the wrong ideas among submissive males regarding what is and what isn't Dominant behavior. Grrrr!

dreamlady -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/9/2015 11:00:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SDFemDom4cuck Exactly Dream Lady! Just as I'm sure there are as numerous different opinions on it by each of us. That is the beauty of it all. The differences. However I agree that sometimes the more inexperienced of Dommes get a little over excited and run amok proclaiming all sorts of stuff in their excitement that can do more harm than good. I don't know that age really makes a difference. I've seen the same in your face omnipotence in "Dommes" twice the OPs age who were just discovering their power. Perhaps the OP was simply out casting her net for clients here on the Mistress Board. Given her lack of response it seems she is less interested in discussing/defending her viewpoint or learning and more interested in setting out bait. The unfortunate part is that the OP's kind of attitude is what perpetuates the wrong ideas among submissive males regarding what is and what isn't Dominant behavior. Grrrr! Oh yeah, it's not so much chronological age as being new (too late to edit), as in young to D/s. Even then, those Dominants who have extensive experience can just end up becoming more experienced as an asshat! There are plenty of middle-aged fools running around, acting out on their mid-life crises. The worst ones I run into are the married middle-aged "sub" men who are either HNG wank fantasists who whine like little crybaby bitches about how their wives aren't into chastity and cuckolding. And/or their foot fetish, sissy fantasies, spanko fantasies, and wanting to get pegged. But of course, any very young person can't possibly have a great deal of experience under her belt. We were all new and inexperienced once, and had to learn things the hard way. OP is 28 and could conceivably have been into kink for the past decade. I doubt that, though. Regardless, anybody in their late 20s should have enough overall diversity of experience to navigate life's terrain effectively, one would hope. DreamLady Shout out to lthrpup -- Where there is a will, there is a way. . . within realistic bounds, naturally.

SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/10/2015 5:04:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dreamlady quote: ORIGINAL: SDFemDom4cuck Exactly Dream Lady! Just as I'm sure there are as numerous different opinions on it by each of us. That is the beauty of it all. The differences. However I agree that sometimes the more inexperienced of Dommes get a little over excited and run amok proclaiming all sorts of stuff in their excitement that can do more harm than good. I don't know that age really makes a difference. I've seen the same in your face omnipotence in "Dommes" twice the OPs age who were just discovering their power. Perhaps the OP was simply out casting her net for clients here on the Mistress Board. Given her lack of response it seems she is less interested in discussing/defending her viewpoint or learning and more interested in setting out bait. The unfortunate part is that the OP's kind of attitude is what perpetuates the wrong ideas among submissive males regarding what is and what isn't Dominant behavior. Grrrr! Oh yeah, it's not so much chronological age as being new (too late to edit), as in young to D/s. Even then, those Dominants who have extensive experience can just end up becoming more experienced as an asshat! There are plenty of middle-aged fools running around, acting out on their mid-life crises. The worst ones I run into are the married middle-aged "sub" men who are either HNG wank fantasists who whine like little crybaby bitches about how their wives aren't into chastity and cuckolding. And/or their foot fetish, sissy fantasies, spanko fantasies, and wanting to get pegged. But of course, any very young person can't possibly have a great deal of experience under her belt. We were all new and inexperienced once, and had to learn things the hard way. OP is 28 and could conceivably have been into kink for the past decade. I doubt that, though. Regardless, anybody in their late 20s should have enough overall diversity of experience to navigate life's terrain effectively, one would hope. DreamLady Shout out to lthrpup -- Where there is a will, there is a way. . . within realistic bounds, naturally. I agree, we were all new at one time. I was lucky to be mentored by a very patient Domme! Which is why I try to be patient, but sometimes....well we are all Human!

LookieNoNookie -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/12/2015 8:41:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2 Is this a public service announcement? Reminds me of local Tsunami warnings...."get to higher ground!!!!"

Spiritedsub2 -> RE: Encouraging Homosexuality Among Sissies (10/13/2015 10:26:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie quote: ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2 Is this a public service announcement? Reminds me of local Tsunami warnings...."get to higher ground!!!!" There be no higher ground on this site [:D]

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625