Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/25/2015 5:17:44 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Those aren't supported positions, Bama -- they're a questionnaire.

And all of them voiced in strict either/or fallacy terms.

Why the insistence on grouping me into something "which we have seen supported to some degree on here"?

My guess is that then you'd have to engage thoughtfully, instead of pulling stock opinions off the shelf.

None of them are misstated. You just post snark and refused to be penned down to saying you actually believe in anything.

You can't read, Your Snarkiness. I've no doubt they are stated just fine -- but why the insistence on shoe-horning me into that "which we have seen supported to some degree on here"? You've conveniently ignored that part.

Everything to you is this or that, black or white, left or right, pro or against, and that's how you see posts here too...you have two groups of people in your head, and you can't fathom positions not squarely in one camp or the other.

Nor am I obsessed with talking about guns 24/7. I'll enter the discussion when there's a point to be made, and not give a shit the rest of the time.

The world isn't simplistic. You are.

That was to show that I wasn't just pulling something out of my hat. It is not questionare I gave you several choices of positions epoused so there might be at least one on which you have an opinion. Instead you whine about being shoehorned. Explain any of those you have a position on and feel free to elaborate on the nuances of said position. Black and white is better than gutless.

BTW every one of those positions has been supported in one thread or another. So yes they are supported positions

Again, you can't read.

Not by me. Why am I supposed to take positions already posted?

Other than you'd need new material, instead of repeating the same shit.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 221
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/25/2015 5:31:27 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Those aren't supported positions, Bama -- they're a questionnaire.

And all of them voiced in strict either/or fallacy terms.

Why the insistence on grouping me into something "which we have seen supported to some degree on here"?

My guess is that then you'd have to engage thoughtfully, instead of pulling stock opinions off the shelf.

None of them are misstated. You just post snark and refused to be penned down to saying you actually believe in anything.

You can't read, Your Snarkiness. I've no doubt they are stated just fine -- but why the insistence on shoe-horning me into that "which we have seen supported to some degree on here"? You've conveniently ignored that part.

Everything to you is this or that, black or white, left or right, pro or against, and that's how you see posts here too...you have two groups of people in your head, and you can't fathom positions not squarely in one camp or the other.

Nor am I obsessed with talking about guns 24/7. I'll enter the discussion when there's a point to be made, and not give a shit the rest of the time.

The world isn't simplistic. You are.

That was to show that I wasn't just pulling something out of my hat. It is not questionare I gave you several choices of positions epoused so there might be at least one on which you have an opinion. Instead you whine about being shoehorned. Explain any of those you have a position on and feel free to elaborate on the nuances of said position. Black and white is better than gutless.

BTW every one of those positions has been supported in one thread or another. So yes they are supported positions

Again, you can't read.

Not by me. Why am I supposed to take positions already posted?

Other than you'd need new material, instead of repeating the same shit.

You don't take a position on anything, except you did say you favor metal detectors in school. Still you act like you know more than those who actually take a stand.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 222
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/25/2015 6:18:18 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Bullshit. I've never done anything of the sort on firearms issues, except in your own head.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 223
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/25/2015 6:43:56 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You don't take a position on anything, except you did say you favor metal detectors in school. Still you act like you know more than those who actually take a stand.


He's a troll, best to ignore him.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 224
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/25/2015 6:48:32 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You don't take a position on anything, except you did say you favor metal detectors in school. Still you act like you know more than those who actually take a stand.


He's a troll, best to ignore him.


yep he adds nothing and takes up space.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 225
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/25/2015 6:50:18 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
And with you making such engaging arguments like that spacious one.



Clown.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 226
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 6:40:44 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You don't take a position on anything, except you did say you favor metal detectors in school. Still you act like you know more than those who actually take a stand.


He's a troll, best to ignore him.


yep he adds nothing and takes up space.


he was my first unpleasant experience here when I re-joined. I was genuinely trying to understand a position/point he was making so I could engage in the conversation, and his response to was to be pompous and play nettlesome word games instead. ive not had an ounce of respect for him since and his recent posts and conversations have only served to affirm that.


< Message edited by bounty44 -- 10/26/2015 6:43:45 AM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 227
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 10:08:26 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You don't take a position on anything, except you did say you favor metal detectors in school. Still you act like you know more than those who actually take a stand.


He's a troll, best to ignore him.


yep he adds nothing and takes up space.


he was my first unpleasant experience here when I re-joined. I was genuinely trying to understand a position/point he was making so I could engage in the conversation, and his response to was to be pompous and play nettlesome word games instead. ive not had an ounce of respect for him since and his recent posts and conversations have only served to affirm that.


That is why I have put him back on hide. I took him off and tried to have a conversation with him for over a month but he just kept playing the same childish games so I won't waste any more time on him.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 228
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 1:35:59 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Its the only way you can get thru any thread here that upsets your ignorance.
Hide from those who do, can and have called you out on your bullshit.
You might think you have the right answers. Your hide list says otherwise.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 229
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 3:54:23 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Its the only way you can get thru any thread here that upsets your ignorance.
Hide from those who do, can and have called you out on your bullshit.
You might think you have the right answers. Your hide list says otherwise.





I wish I could hide every bloody gun-thread.

Couldn't there be a separate forum entitled 'Gun Politics' - or even, ideally, a separate website? But what am I talking about - there are no doubt half a zillion websites devoted to discussing guns. (Though I would hazard a guess that they're not sites that are based this side of the pond.)

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 230
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 4:46:53 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Its the only way you can get thru any thread here that upsets your ignorance.
Hide from those who do, can and have called you out on your bullshit.
You might think you have the right answers. Your hide list says otherwise.





I wish I could hide every bloody gun-thread.

Couldn't there be a separate forum entitled 'Gun Politics' - or even, ideally, a separate website? But what am I talking about - there are no doubt half a zillion websites devoted to discussing guns. (Though I would hazard a guess that they're not sites that are based this side of the pond.)

You could just stay out of them, that is what I do with threads that bore me, or that I don't care about.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 231
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 5:50:31 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

You could just stay out of them, that is what I do with threads that bore me, or that I don't care about.


I don't mind them for a few pages, I suppose. I like to hear what's happening out in the colonies occasionally.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 232
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 5:55:50 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

You could just stay out of them, that is what I do with threads that bore me, or that I don't care about.


I don't mind them for a few pages, I suppose. I like to hear what's happening out in the colonies occasionally.

Not going to bite.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 233
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 6:07:11 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Not going to bite.


No need for you to. No doubt JLF1961 will be back ASAP, to give me about three pages worth of bites.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 234
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 7:03:06 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Not going to bite.


No need for you to. No doubt JLF1961 will be back ASAP, to give me about three pages worth of bites.



Presumably not in a sexytime way?

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 235
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 7:54:57 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
he was my first unpleasant experience here when I re-joined. I was genuinely trying to understand a position/point he was making so I could engage in the conversation, and his response to was to be pompous and play nettlesome word games instead. ive not had an ounce of respect for him since and his recent posts and conversations have only served to affirm that.


That's one way to sell it to yourself, I suppose.

It's true I have little tolerance for bullshit.

Even winged bullshit.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 236
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 10:47:29 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

No, we want to keep private ownership of guns because of the simple fact that 200+ years ago we learned a lesson about a tyrannical government and what it will do to basic human rights.

The government is already tyrannical .....


If, as you claim, your government is "already tyrannical", then it automatically follows that your 2nd Amendment rights have not succeeded in preventing, or protecting citizens from, a tyrannical government.

As there doesn't appear to be any prospect of the "already tyrannical" US Govt succumbing to a popular revolt by armed citizens on the horizon, then it would appear that your 2nd Amendment rights inasmuch as they were there to prevent tyranny, or provide a means enabling citizens to remove a tyrannical government, have turned out to be a complete dud.


Should the US simply do away with the Bill of Rights because the government continues to encroach on the rights outlined in it? Does that make the Bill of Rights any less important? At least US citizens have recourse, much unlike other countries.

Perhaps The People are waiting for a "point of no return" before starting a second civil war. I'd like to think the catalyst would be something noble but in reality I think it will be incredibly trivial.


It is both simplistic and incorrect to assert that the point I made - that the 2nd Amendment failed to prevent, or enable citizens to overthrow a Govt that is "already tyrannical" - implies the abolition of the Bill of Rights. It does no such thing.

The only thing abolished by my point is the fallacy, repeatedly advanced by the pro-gun lobby, that the 2nd Amendment offers an effective and successful means of preventing and/or overthrowing a tyrannical Govt. That argument is shown to be a complete dud, a total fallacy (some might add much like the 2nd Amendment itself).

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 10/26/2015 11:04:02 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 237
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/26/2015 11:22:52 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Well Em, I hope we can agree to disagree. The idea of a society filled with peopple with gun scares y'all and I guess I can understand that due to your conditioning - to submit to authority. A good bunch of us don't.

The bottom line here is that foreigners do not understand that we got alot of people here need killing. Males who beat their olady until they get their head blown off on a fishing trip with their brother in law, and that is just a missing person. Not even half of the murders in this country are solved.

I really do not understand why people in other countries are so concerned with USians giving up their guns. They think we gonna shoot them or something ? I won't shoot you unless you try to take my shit. And among my shit is a gun or two, or... ... If you do not try to take my shit, hurt me or my family and chosen family, I will not shoot you unless you ask me to. (like if you have cancer or some shit, and then we gotta go out in the woods)

If you want to take my guns, may a rabid pit bull maul, kill and eat one of your family members right in front of your eyes so you can see all the gory details. And you know what ? It will be you anti gunners who have made it possible and more probable. Not us pro gunners. YOU, and if YOU have any guns, after taking ours, with my last dying gasp I will lower you into the boiling bacon grease at one inch per minute, to give you the full effect.

About a hundred million or so stand with me, and you hoplophobes ain't taking shit. COME AND GET IT. You don't like guns, don't get guns. Now come to get mine and do it without guns. Y'know how it takes money to make money ? Well it takes guns to take guns.

You get the fucking logic here ? It is a one way thing. Once the guns are gone, unless you got a lathe, and a chemical plant, they can take whatever the fuck they want from you. And now statists want to ask me who "they" are ?

They are the people with the guns.

T^T

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 238
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/27/2015 3:35:24 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I really do not understand why people in other countries are so concerned with USians giving up their guns. They think we gonna shoot them or something ?


Not us. Each other.

Astonishing as it may seem, I really don't like to hear stories about Americans getting shot so often.

Americans are people too. ;-)

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 239
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 10/27/2015 4:22:12 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Americans are people too. ;-)


We're not just any people, we're lovmuffin......er I mean gunlovin rednecks


_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 240
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125