Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 2:18:18 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
ETA: if you need to be in constant preparedness.... that's what people call paranoia.
Paranoia: Paranoia is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion. Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory, or beliefs of conspiracy concerning a perceived threat towards oneself .


your definition doesn't fit the circumstances.

I don't call someone hiking through the desert, carrying water, "paranoid", I call them prepared.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 321
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 2:19:39 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
But owning a hand gun is damed near impossible, and self defence, a basic right that even animals have, is not, according to other Englishmen on here, recognized. Bit no there is no real restrictions there. Would you like some oacean front property in Arizona that I can get for you cheap.

It's no more 'near impossible' for a normal person than it is in the US.
As for self defense - see my response to muffin.
And which animals do you know of that are able to get hold of a hand gun let alone use one?

I'd like that ocean-front property


Did I say with guns, my Rott can rip a person to shreads almost as fast as they can be shot to death.
Here, a dog gets one free bite, and if self defense is estabilshed they are ok.
As for knives, if you are right why did knife muerders in DC skyrocket in DC when they banned handguns? Gun merders went down minutely but knife murders incearsed enough to DOUBLE their murder rate.
You say some one can get a gun there as easy as here. Either they can't, or every word you has said about our easy access is a lie.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 322
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 2:21:25 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
But owning a hand gun is damed near impossible, and self defence, a basic right that even animals have, is not, according to other Englishmen on here, recognized. Bit no there is no real restrictions there. Would you like some oacean front property in Arizona that I can get for you cheap.

It's no more 'near impossible' for a normal person than it is in the US.
As for self defense - see my response to muffin.
And which animals do you know of that are able to get hold of a hand gun let alone use one?

I'd like that ocean-front property


As for the property, with the things you believe you are a prime customer.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 323
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 2:26:10 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
On good, another poster gone off his meds, and a British one at that. What you posted about life and paranoia in this country is so highly exaggerated it doesn't even come close to the truth. We're talking about the America here on earth. We don't want you fucking gun laws so stir that up in your tea and drink it.

Oh goody!!
I'll go sit on my lawn without fear of being shot.
Or maybe I'll go into town and browse the malls and grab a coffee - without passing armed guards or fear of being shot.

I like my freedom!


And I will do the same I love my freedom too

I don't see that a constant fear of being attacked and wanting/needing a gun for protection is actually much of a freedom.
Like a recently released prisoner having to constantly look over your shoulder and wonder if the next person is going to go nuts and start shooting people.

That's no freedom at all. That's being a prisoner to a gun-crazed society.



I think you have some kind of gun derangement syndrome. Once again, we're talking about the USA here on earth. Bamas situation is unique to where he lives. I Don't have any constant fear despite your stupid prisoner analogy. Using the term "gun-crazed society" just shows how truly ignorant you are about life and culture here. Your ranting is stupid and exaggerated farther out into the galaxy than Pluto. Get back on your meds.


I don't have constant fear, just constant preparedness. And you are correct, only a small portion of Americans live in a neighborhood that went bad after they moved into it. And mine is geting better. Why, because some people did not think like FD and Joe, they didn't tuck their tails and run, they stuck it out. There were pockets of civilization in the midst of the jungle. Finnaly the cops have started pressing the issue. Last summer one of the houses where the owner always renred to gangbanger wata-bes was bought by a woman who is very carefull about who she lets in there. 5 years ago I owned an island. Now I form the boarder.


I know exactly what you meant and I don't think you live in paranoia and fear nor did I mean to imply it. It was where FD's exaggerated ramblings are coming from.

I know that, I was making a preemtive strike agaist anyone tring to twist what you did say.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 324
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 2:30:01 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
ETA: if you need to be in constant preparedness.... that's what people call paranoia.
Paranoia: Paranoia is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion. Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory, or beliefs of conspiracy concerning a perceived threat towards oneself .


your definition doesn't fit the circumstances.

I don't call someone hiking through the desert, carrying water, "paranoid", I call them prepared.


Uh, there aint been a desert in western new york in the time you have been alive, and for several generations prior. There are people who carry water near the ocean.

The notion is purely inept. What are you? 4:100K out there? http://www.humanosphere.org/science/2015/10/visualizing-gun-deaths-comparing-u-s-rest-world/

Rather more like carrying grains of sand in your pockets in case Monty Hall will give you $200 to build a desert right where you stand.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 325
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 2:37:36 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
But owning a hand gun is damed near impossible, and self defence, a basic right that even animals have, is not, according to other Englishmen on here, recognized. Bit no there is no real restrictions there. Would you like some oacean front property in Arizona that I can get for you cheap.

It's no more 'near impossible' for a normal person than it is in the US.
As for self defense - see my response to muffin.
And which animals do you know of that are able to get hold of a hand gun let alone use one?

I'd like that ocean-front property


Did I say with guns, my Rott can rip a person to shreads almost as fast as they can be shot to death.
Here, a dog gets one free bite, and if self defense is estabilshed they are ok.
As for knives, if you are right why did knife muerders in DC skyrocket in DC when they banned handguns? Gun merders went down minutely but knife murders incearsed enough to DOUBLE their murder rate.
You say some one can get a gun there as easy as here. Either they can't, or every word you has said about our easy access is a lie.

Over here, if a dog bites someone, it is destroyed as a dangerous dog.
No quibbles, no arguments.......... put down by order of the courts.
And that also applies to people owning dogs for self-protection too.
Animals don't get a freebie 'self defense' hit/bite first unless it's a police dog on duty.

DC knife murders went up to double because you have a shitload of misfits that couldn't get hold of more guns.

If I was so inclined (and I'm not), I only need to apply for a gun permit, wait for the obligatory 2 weeks while they scrutinize my history and criminal record, pay the license fee and go buy a gun.
Yes.... it is that simple here.
But.... you have to declare why you need it, to what use it is being put, and where it and its ammo is being kept.
AND, the license is for just that one gun - not an armoury of weapons.
If I legitimately owned a legally licensed gun, it is not allowed to be transported or carried in a public place unless it is separated from its ammo and locked in a steel cabinet.

This is essential difference between buying/owning a gun here and in the US.


Buying one on the black market isn't so easy here because there just aren't that many guns here to get one 'under the radar'.
It's not impossible of course, just not so easy as it is in the US.

_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 326
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 2:48:21 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
ETA: if you need to be in constant preparedness.... that's what people call paranoia.
Paranoia: Paranoia is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion. Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory, or beliefs of conspiracy concerning a perceived threat towards oneself .


your definition doesn't fit the circumstances.

I don't call someone hiking through the desert, carrying water, "paranoid", I call them prepared.

Different ball of wax because you know you are likely to die through lack of water in a desert.
But pulling a 5,000 gallon tank of water "just in case my flask/bottle runs out" is paranoia.
Going for a dip in a lake and taking full scuba gear, a knife and spear gun "just in case you meet a shark" is paranoia.

If you think you need a gun for self-defense, unless you are in a war zone, is paranoia.
Only in the US would you be thinking this way - the rest of the civilized world doesn't need a gun.



_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 327
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 2:55:38 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
But owning a hand gun is damed near impossible, and self defence, a basic right that even animals have, is not, according to other Englishmen on here, recognized. Bit no there is no real restrictions there. Would you like some oacean front property in Arizona that I can get for you cheap.

It's no more 'near impossible' for a normal person than it is in the US.
As for self defense - see my response to muffin.
And which animals do you know of that are able to get hold of a hand gun let alone use one?

I'd like that ocean-front property


Did I say with guns, my Rott can rip a person to shreads almost as fast as they can be shot to death.
Here, a dog gets one free bite, and if self defense is estabilshed they are ok.
As for knives, if you are right why did knife muerders in DC skyrocket in DC when they banned handguns? Gun merders went down minutely but knife murders incearsed enough to DOUBLE their murder rate.
You say some one can get a gun there as easy as here. Either they can't, or every word you has said about our easy access is a lie.

Over here, if a dog bites someone, it is destroyed as a dangerous dog.
No quibbles, no arguments.......... put down by order of the courts.
And that also applies to people owning dogs for self-protection too.
Animals don't get a freebie 'self defense' hit/bite first unless it's a police dog on duty.

DC knife murders went up to double because you have a shitload of misfits that couldn't get hold of more guns.

If I was so inclined (and I'm not), I only need to apply for a gun permit, wait for the obligatory 2 weeks while they scrutinize my history and criminal record, pay the license fee and go buy a gun.
Yes.... it is that simple here.
But.... you have to declare why you need it, to what use it is being put, and where it and its ammo is being kept.
AND, the license is for just that one gun - not an armoury of weapons.
If I legitimately owned a legally licensed gun, it is not allowed to be transported or carried in a public place unless it is separated from its ammo and locked in a steel cabinet.

This is essential difference between buying/owning a gun here and in the US.


Buying one on the black market isn't so easy here because there just aren't that many guns here to get one 'under the radar'.
It's not impossible of course, just not so easy as it is in the US.

Does that include handguns?
And you just confirmed that, unlike civilized countries you don't recogniz sef defence.
BTW I dpn't care how you do it there.
So if you still have misfits you will syill have muders, particularly if the victims arn't allowed to defend themselves. But thats right, you don't believe in selfe defence for anyone but yourself.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 328
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 2:57:03 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
ETA: if you need to be in constant preparedness.... that's what people call paranoia.
Paranoia: Paranoia is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion. Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory, or beliefs of conspiracy concerning a perceived threat towards oneself .


your definition doesn't fit the circumstances.

I don't call someone hiking through the desert, carrying water, "paranoid", I call them prepared.

Different ball of wax because you know you are likely to die through lack of water in a desert.
But pulling a 5,000 gallon tank of water "just in case my flask/bottle runs out" is paranoia.
Going for a dip in a lake and taking full scuba gear, a knife and spear gun "just in case you meet a shark" is paranoia.

If you think you need a gun for self-defense, unless you are in a war zone, is paranoia.
Only in the US would you be thinking this way - the rest of the civilized world doesn't need a gun.



So
Using a seat belt is paranoia.
Having a spare tire is paranoia.
Changing your oil is paranoia.
Having a fire extinguisher is paranoia.
Locking your doors is paranoia.
Having a gun safe is paranoia.
Having trigger locks is paranoia.
Wearing a coat in the winter is paranoia.
Get the point?

< Message edited by BamaD -- 11/2/2015 3:23:11 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 329
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 2:58:59 PM   
MisterP61


Posts: 1345
Joined: 10/9/2007
Status: offline
http://news.yahoo.com/colorado-shooting-victims-were-recovering-addicts-cyclist-224245172.html;_ylt=A0LEVzc46jdWQ50AYExXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEybDZvNmFxBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDQjEyMDNfMQRzZWMDc2M-

Yeah FD. You're right. These people who were shot on Saturday would have been paranoid for carrying a gun. Give me a break OK? People who will do harm don't give fuck number 1 about any law.

_____________________________

Proudly married to the "Diva of Destruction" LadyPact
Though the truth may vary, this ship will carry our bodies safe to shore - Of Monsters and Men
What is the maximum effective range of an excuse? Zero meters!

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 330
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 3:27:32 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MisterP61

http://news.yahoo.com/colorado-shooting-victims-were-recovering-addicts-cyclist-224245172.html;_ylt=A0LEVzc46jdWQ50AYExXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEybDZvNmFxBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDQjEyMDNfMQRzZWMDc2M-

Yeah FD. You're right. These people who were shot on Saturday would have been paranoid for carrying a gun. Give me a break OK? People who will do harm don't give fuck number 1 about any law.

As was the guy in Chicago (who had a cc permit) who shot an armed robber, how could he acctualy know the robber was going to shoot anyone, maybe he was bluffing. You have to sacrifice at least one victim before you can fight back.


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to MisterP61)
Profile   Post #: 331
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 3:37:48 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

Perhaps you have forgotten that I lived in NC and FL for the best part of 9 months (not as a tourist either).

Wow, 9 whole months! Is that where your mastery of pellet gun ballistics comes from.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 332
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 3:49:59 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


Perhaps you have forgotten that I lived in NC and FL for the best part of 9 months (not as a tourist either).
I saw it. I saw it in other 'wonderful' Americans and their attitude.

And I don't need meds - I don't have a paranoia and fear to take meds for

And your Jeff Cooper quote is crap.
People create the gun problem - not just criminals.
How many 'non-criminals' have caused a gun death in the US??
More than you care to want to know. Try looking it up sometime.


1) 9 months here in the US and you didn't get shot ?? I'm so glad you're alive.

2) Being prepared has nothing to do with the definition of paranoia as you stated in your made up definition posting to Bama.

3) My signature line is not full of crap, you are. It simply means that taking criminals off the street does a lot more good than taking guns from peacable citizens.

4) How many non-criminals have caused a gun death in the US you ask ? The ones where it was ruled as a justifiable homicide.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 333
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 3:51:38 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Does that include handguns?


Yes. But only certain ones - not every handgun on the market.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
And you just confirmed that, unlike civilized countries you don't recogniz sef defence.


We do. Just not a good enough reason to own a gun.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
BTW I dpn't care how you do it there.


We know you don't care all the while you can have your guns.
The gun death stats prove every argument you've ever thrown at it.
The US has by far the biggest gun deaths of every civilized nation in the world.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
So if you still have misfits you will syill have muders, particularly if the victims arn't allowed to defend themselves. But thats right, you don't believe in selfe defence for anyone but yourself.

We do defend ourselves.
Just not with guns because they are unnecessary in civilized countries outside of the US.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 334
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 3:57:15 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MisterP61
Yeah FD. You're right. These people who were shot on Saturday would have been paranoid for carrying a gun. Give me a break OK? People who will do harm don't give fuck number 1 about any law.

Yep you are dead right there.
No argument from me on that one.

But explain why the US has shitloads more gun deaths than anywhere else in the civilized world??

More misfits?? Possibly.
The underlying fact is that the US, with by far the biggest gun ownership per capita, also happens to have by far the biggest number of gun deaths per capita than anywhere in the civilized world.

If, as many pro-gun people claim, that guns stop gun deaths, why is the US figure by far the worst??
If what is claimed is true, your figures should be exemplary; but they aren't.
It is quite the contrary - which disproves the claims.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to MisterP61)
Profile   Post #: 335
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 4:09:46 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: MisterP61
Yeah FD. You're right. These people who were shot on Saturday would have been paranoid for carrying a gun. Give me a break OK? People who will do harm don't give fuck number 1 about any law.

Yep you are dead right there.
No argument from me on that one.

But explain why the US has shitloads more gun deaths than anywhere else in the civilized world??

More misfits?? Possibly.
The underlying fact is that the US, with by far the biggest gun ownership per capita, also happens to have by far the biggest number of gun deaths per capita than anywhere in the civilized world.

If, as many pro-gun people claim, that guns stop gun deaths, why is the US figure by far the worst??
If what is claimed is true, your figures should be exemplary; but they aren't.
It is quite the contrary - which disproves the claims.


More misfits, that is the problem.
Taking one fact does not prove your point.
As I pointed out, and you agreed to, banning guns in DC not only didn't help the citizens because the misfits caused the crime rate to double, including murders by using other weapons. Get rid of the misfits, (as you call them) and you get rid of the problem. Get rid of the guns, and you just allows the miscreants (as I call them) and the gun problem will go away.
Only specific guns, only for a special reason, never for self defence, self defence is only allowed if the victim uses a means that will get them injured.
You have gotten so "civilized" that you think the life of a criminal is as important and the life of anyone else. Watch "Watership Down" and think about how you live in the warren. You would have fit right in with the city council of "High Noon".

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 336
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 4:16:28 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

1) 9 months here in the US and you didn't get shot ?? I'm so glad you're alive.

2) Being prepared has nothing to do with the definition of paranoia as you stated in your made up definition posting to Bama.

3) My signature line is not full of crap, you are. It simply means that taking criminals off the street does a lot more good than taking guns from peacable citizens.

4) How many non-criminals have caused a gun death in the US you ask ? The ones where it was ruled as a justifiable homicide.

The definition was from Wiki and similar from the oxford dictionary, the urban dictionary, and Merriam Webster.
Wasn't 'my' definition.
Being prepared is one thing. Having to be constantly prepared is quite another.

If all the citizens that owned guns were peaceable, I would agree with you.
The stats of gun deaths, often caused by (at the time) 'peaceable and law-abiding citizens' proves otherwise.
What does that tell you??
That not all citizens with guns are peaceable.
It's not just the criminals - it's other misfit citizens too.
So when you get all your misfits under control so they can't have a gun or get their hands on one, that will bring your stats down quite a lot.
If you take the guns off the streets, criminals or otherwise, that would also diminish the gun deaths considerably.


Just like drink or drugs and vehicles.
They tightened up the laws so that people need to be tested before they can drive a car.
If they get caught without a license, or are incapable of driving due to drink or drugs, they are stopped from driving (at least for a while).
It doesn't cure every drink/drive death but it sure cut the numbers down.

So what is wrong in applying equally stringent laws/rules/regulations etc to guns - all guns, not just a select few or in select areas.
Is that such a hardship to make the country safer without affecting the rights of people to buy and own them?
I'll tell you why... because of redneck pig-headedness attitudes.
You would sooner see someone die from a gun by a 'civilized and law-abiding citizen' than curtail your use of guns.
It's happening all too often and nobody over there is doing fuck all about it in sensible terms.

Rid the criminals of their guns??
Sure!! Get more armed police or form a militia and go hunt the fuckers down.
Coz your government isn't doing shit about it. Neither are the sensible citizens.
But something needs to be done.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 337
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 4:27:42 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
More misfits, that is the problem.
Taking one fact does not prove your point.
As I pointed out, and you agreed to, banning guns in DC not only didn't help the citizens because the misfits caused the crime rate to double, including murders by using other weapons. Get rid of the misfits, (as you call them) and you get rid of the problem. Get rid of the guns, and you just allows the miscreants (as I call them) and the gun problem will go away.

I didn't claim the gun problem would go away.
It's never an all-or-nothing fix.
Take the guns off the streets, that will help tremendously.
As MrP said, criminals don't give a shit about laws.
So if you severely limit the places where they can get guns, that would help.
All too often the gun incidents are from people who legitimately bought the guns or they stole/borrowed from someone else who legitimately bought them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Only specific guns, only for a special reason, never for self defence, self defence is only allowed if the victim uses a means that will get them injured.

Who said they would get injured??
I didn't. You assumed it because it didn't involve a gun.
As I commented earlier, with virtually no guns to be had, most assailants are full of bluster and bravado and a big mouth.
Of course you can't (or won't) see that because your philosophy is more guns to defend against other guns.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You have gotten so "civilized" that you think the life of a criminal is as important and the life of anyone else. Watch "Watership Down" and think about how you live in the warren. You would have fit right in with the city council of "High Noon".

I've seen Watership Down dozens of times.
And nowhere do I state or imply that the criminal is as important as the victim.
They deserve all they get - but not dead.
Being alive to face your crime is more important than carting a coffin.
Besides which, the right to life is part of the Geneva Convention - even those criminals and murderers we so much despise.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 338
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 4:38:30 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Does that include handguns?


Yes. But only certain ones - not every handgun on the market.



Full of crap as usual. The only place on the mainland where you can own a standard handgun is Northern Ireland. Everywhere else you have to have a long barrel added to it and a rod sticking out of the grip like a shoulder stock would except it's just a metal rod, not a shoulder stock. Long guns are limited to 3 rounds and center fire long guns can't be semi auto. How fucked up is that ?


_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 339
RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. - 11/2/2015 4:43:01 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

If you take the guns off the streets, criminals or otherwise, that would also diminish the gun deaths considerably.

Ohferchrissake, stop flogging this stupid tautology. What difference would it make in terms of human lives if gun deaths went to zero and the homicide rate stayed the same? Do you care about human lives, or are you only just obsessed with guns?

K.


(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 340
Page:   <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Best Historic Argument in Keeping Guns. Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109