How come.... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


LookieNoNookie -> How come.... (11/2/2015 3:39:54 PM)

All you chics...

You all have the deal.

What's the secret code?

How does it work?

Seriously....what's the secret code?




Spiritedsub2 -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 4:15:14 PM)

You know the answer to that.
42.




MercTech -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 4:22:37 PM)

Or is it 72... 69 plus two fingers




Lucylastic -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 7:14:53 PM)

71?




LookieNoNookie -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 7:20:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2

You know the answer to that.
42.


42.

That is the answer.




LookieNoNookie -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 7:21:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

Or is it 72... 69 plus two fingers


42.

(Everyone knows that).




Spiritedsub2 -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 7:22:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2

You know the answer to that.
42.


42.

That is the answer.


The complete answer is 42, tits, and a towel.




Lucylastic -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 7:26:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2

You know the answer to that.
42.


42.

That is the answer.


The complete answer is 42, tits, and a towel.


what about the babel fish...




Spiritedsub2 -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 7:28:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2

You know the answer to that.
42.


42.

That is the answer.


The complete answer is 42, tits, and a towel.


what about the babel fish...


Edit: 42, tits, towel, and Babel fish :D




Lucylastic -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 7:34:16 PM)

hehehehhe




AAkasha -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 8:11:33 PM)

ProTip:

Stop referring to women as "chics" --

I don't get it, new users get CRUCIFIED when calling women by anything that resembles this kind of slang.

First time I read one of your weird one-line "looking for reaction" posts I figured it was a fluke, but you do it all the time.

It is a classless way to refer to women. I recommend you add some tact to your posts, especially if you want to continue these 4-5/a week one-line attempts for attention.

Akasha




dcnovice -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 8:22:47 PM)

FR

Shouldn't this be in Random Stupidity?




DaddySatyr -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 8:45:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

Or is it 72... 69 plus two fingers


Well, either your math is wrong or you're conflating "The Shocker" (two in the pink, one in the stink) with your answer?



Michael




stef -> RE: How come.... (11/2/2015 9:06:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

FR

Shouldn't this be in Random Stupidity?

What's random about it?




Kreychec -> RE: How come.... (11/3/2015 2:13:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

ProTip:

Stop referring to women as "chics" --

I don't get it, new users get CRUCIFIED when calling women by anything that resembles this kind of slang.

First time I read one of your weird one-line "looking for reaction" posts I figured it was a fluke, but you do it all the time.

It is a classless way to refer to women. I recommend you add some tact to your posts, especially if you want to continue these 4-5/a week one-line attempts for attention.

Akasha

When someone interprets something as derogatory almost anything that is said
about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) it's conclude that
he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is
pronounced among minority rights advocates, whether or not they belong
to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are
hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities. The terms
"negro," "oriental," "handicapped" or "chick" for an African, an
Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory
connotation. "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine equivalents
of "guy," "dude" or "fellow." The negative connotations have been
attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal
rights advocates have gone so far as to reject the word "pet" and
insist on its replacement by "animal companion." Leftist
anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about
primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative.
They want to replace the word "primitive" by "nonliterate." They seem
almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive
culture is inferior to their own.




AAkasha -> RE: How come.... (11/3/2015 11:54:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kreychec

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

ProTip:

Stop referring to women as "chics" --

I don't get it, new users get CRUCIFIED when calling women by anything that resembles this kind of slang.

First time I read one of your weird one-line "looking for reaction" posts I figured it was a fluke, but you do it all the time.

It is a classless way to refer to women. I recommend you add some tact to your posts, especially if you want to continue these 4-5/a week one-line attempts for attention.

Akasha

When someone interprets something as derogatory almost anything that is said
about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) it's conclude that
he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is
pronounced among minority rights advocates, whether or not they belong
to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are
hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities. The terms
"negro," "oriental," "handicapped" or "chick" for an African, an
Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory
connotation. "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine equivalents
of "guy," "dude" or "fellow." The negative connotations have been
attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal
rights advocates have gone so far as to reject the word "pet" and
insist on its replacement by "animal companion." Leftist
anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about
primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative.
They want to replace the word "primitive" by "nonliterate." They seem
almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive
culture is inferior to their own.


I personally don't care what terms people use as blanket terms for gender, you'll see from my post history I have never been one to jump on the bandwagon and lambaste newbies for calling women "girls." I just find it really hypocritical since the posts by the OP almost never contain anything of real substance and use terminology that would have newbies run out of town.

Akasha




AAkasha -> RE: How come.... (11/3/2015 11:55:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

FR

Shouldn't this be in Random Stupidity?





Kreychec -> RE: How come.... (11/3/2015 11:56:53 AM)

fair enough




LookieNoNookie -> RE: How come.... (11/3/2015 2:41:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2

You know the answer to that.
42.


42.

That is the answer.


The complete answer is 42, tits, and a towel.



I believe you've added something to the mix....however...I feel it's an acceptable (and necessary) addition.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125