quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

I fully expect davis to get her ass handed to her because while she does have the right to 'her' conscience, therefore with regard to what she signs 'her' name to, I cant imagine how she can extend 'her conscience' to the department since the others also have a right to their conscience and they may very well not have a problem with signing their name. I fully expect she will get her ass handed to her by attempting to make it policy despite the fact she 'personally' has the right to refuse.

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

I fully expect davis to get her ass handed to her because while she does have the right to 'her' conscience, therefore with regard to what she signs 'her' name to, I cant imagine how she can extend 'her conscience' to the department since the others also have a right to their conscience and they may very well not have a problem with signing their name. I fully expect she will get her ass handed to her by attempting to make it policy despite the fact she 'personally' has the right to refuse.

I agree, but I think it also goes beyond this. By issuing marriage licenses to atheists and people of non-Christian faiths (people her faith view as sinners) she's already shown that marriage licenses aren't about religion and aren't about HER faith. She's contradicted herself and it takes away her argument.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Kim davis is not in the military.

Its your confused attempt at an argument, either post a citation where the trustees of a civil office give up their rights reserved or tfb.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Kim davis is not in the military.

Its your confused attempt at an argument, either post a citation where the trustees of a civil office give up their rights reserved or tfb.

Nope you are the confused one.
What rights have been assumed to be given up?

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

And as usual, you are full of shit. All people do not have a religion. Thats the most ignorant of the ignorant shit you have spewed.




I think that title belongs to the post that says her god makes the rules for my country

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Real0ne

However her religion is for her to decide not the government. These other people that she certified were man+woman no religion expressed or implied. However man+man and woman+woman is in direct violation of her religious beliefs because it goes without saying that they are homosexual and this is forbidden by her religion virtually from the beginning of time.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

For Davis to certify a gay marriage forces her to become 'an accomplice in the commission of a crime against her God', thus making her liable.

Fuck her god. When did her god get elected to a pubic office in the u.s.?

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Actually, the two issues are unrelated.

The issue here is she is refusing to issue marriage licenses on the grounds of her religion, which is not protected under the constitution. There are officers of the Hindu faith in the US military, and must, regardless of their beliefs, treat Sikhs with the same respect as due other members of the Armed Services.

The constitution protects her right only in the private sector, as a public administrator or elected she is required by law to follow the laws, both federal and local.

If this is a problem, she can resign.

For her to win the case, she would have to prove the laws of the United States, as well as the constitution are based on Christian moral law, which has been tried in the past and lost.