RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


subrob1967 -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 12:50:00 PM)

I'll just leave this here.

Leave it to the Aussies to get it right (for once)
Modern Educayshun




joether -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 1:09:35 PM)

It's adorable that you got your 'talking points' from the conservative media....

Due, if your going to debate with me, you seriously got to bring you 'A' game to the table....

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
It sounds to me like someone might have whispered the word "Legacy" into one of those huge ears.


He already has many accomplishments as a US President:

1 ) 1st black US President
2 ) Turned a recession and possible depression into a bull market
3 ) Reduced the deficit
4 ) Took down Osama bin Laden
5 ) Ended two wars
6 ) The Affordable Care Act
7 ) Restore credibility of the USA towards other nations
8 ) Accomplish all this with total and absolute opposition from the GOP/TP

I'm not even hitting the tip of the iceberge of good things this president has done for the nation. Long after Mr. Obama has passed away due to old age, people will talk about Obamacare. From all the photos and video, future Americans will see Mr. Obama is a fairly positive view.

His opposition all this time has been small minded individuals with very little concepts or ideas on how to make the nation better. They likewise, will not really be known or cared about in ten to fifteen years. The President has quite a good legacy. Might be why Mrs. Clinton is having an easy time with the election just as George H. W. Bush did under Ronald Reagan. Unlike G. H. W. Bush, Hillary will get two terms!


#1 This is relevant to performance in office how?


Let's go over the facts. How many US Presidents before President Obama was elected in the United States of America, were black? The man's experience when elected was one term as a Senator. He managed to do one thing that none of hte current 'crop' of GOP/TP can even attempt to do: Beat Hillary Clinton in a fair election. Once securing his party's nomination, had to convince many Americans to vote for him that were moderate. What helped him the most was the Republican Party. Their VP was none other than Sarah Palin. Mr. McCain behaved liked someone pandering to conservatives instead of being his own man. He got more votes from Americans than his Republican contender. That is a pretty good amount of obstacles to cross to become a US President.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
#2 by some very creative accounting. The average Joe is still in recession while the richest 10% are mopping up.


The richest 1% are 'mopping up' as you call it due to people like *YOU* voting in GOP/TP whom then try to structure government to give everything to the super rich and mega corporations. At current the unemployment rate is 5%, gas prices are in the low $2 range, housing sales are up, and its looking like a pretty decent year for retail. The Dow is well past double the height it was when President Obama took office. The economy is doing well in many places. Come on, even GUN SHOPS have had some AWESOME ROI's since this guy became President.

All this under total and absolute GOP/TP opposition! Or have you conveniently 'forgotten' (again) that your party tried to wreck the national economy in order to make the President see only one term in office? Which politically party was totally opposed to the ARRA? Do you even know what the ARRA is and what it came into law?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
#3 Which deficit? The last I looked; the import export ratio was still in deficit numbers. The only thing that helped with the foreign exchange deficit was the shift in exchange rate. The fall in oil prices due to the increased supply with fracking probably has more to do with the decrease than anything done inside the beltway.


When President Obama took office the national deficit (thanks to the GOP/TP) was at a record high. During his time in office the President has reduced that number (with help from Democrats) down to $~250 billion. Its not the best; but certainly better than the trillion dollar deficits.....

The amount of oil created through the process of fracking is negligible compared to imports and changes in the culture of America. US Auto Makers have to look 'down the road' when it comes to auto sales. If they make autos whom get shitty gas mileage, they lose customers. When President Obama took office, people were talking about $6/gallon prices at the pump. So Auto makers adjusted cars to be more fuel efficient. That cars just ten years ago got 25 miles to the gallon, now are doing 43 miles. That's 180 miles one can travel with the same amount of fuel.

In addition, the Internet has allowed less reliance on traveling to 'Brick and Mortar' stores to purchase things. Now, one can go to Amazon.com, plug in an order, pay for it, and wait a few days for it to be mailed to them. Less gas and wear/tear on their cars. Some people have switched for gasoline to other modes of fuel.

All these things, including oil industries domestically and foreign increased production. Less demand while much in supply, makes for low gas prices. Its simple macro economics, CD!

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
#4 bin Laden was taken down by the military. Obama just happened to be in office when it happened. Ok, he was CIC so I'll buy that one a bit.


Where was Osama bin Laden....FOUND? In Iraq? Afghanistan? No, In Pakistan. Were we at 'war' with Pakistan. No of course not; they have nuclear weapons! In fact that nation was our ally (or neutral party). Therefore the call to allow the operation to process forward falls to the US President. President Obama had to make the final decision. An there was PLENTY of stuff that could have gone wrong. And what the GOP/TP, not to mention its mindless followers do if something went wrong? Attack the Presdient every which way they could think on. So where was all the praise by the GOP/TP to President Obama for taking the gutsy move? Totally silent....

He didn't 'just happen to be CIC', he was elected. Got more votes and electoral states than his rival.

Its amusing to watch conservatives tip-toe around this subject. They want to attack the President while giving praise to the troops. Well, without the President giving the order, those troops could not have done what they accomplished.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
#5 The last time I looked the wars were still going on. Our troops just have a smaller piece of it.


So we have M-1 Battle Tanks driving around Iraq and Afghanistan, still?

Our part in the wars is pretty much over. The nation has one thing those nations do not have right now: experienced individuals at all levels of the military logistics engine. This covers intelligence, combat ability, command structuring, and logistics of supplies and personnel. Yes, there are many liberals that would like us to be fully out of both locations. But that's not a realistic option given circumstances. For us to fully withdraw from the area would mean removing our support of Israel. How many people in the GOP want to do that again? Like....none?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
#6 A mandatory, forced, sinecure for health insurance companies still has little or nothing to do with being able to get health care. That is like a LT saying "I have a map so I control the territory". Or like comparing apples to durien fruit; one smells of fermented sweat socks.


The ACA neither forces you nor mandates you to have health insurance. There is a fine for not having one. But then, that is how many other laws operate on the books. And not just at the federal level either. For example, most states have posted speed limits. If you follow the law, your a good motorist; if you go over that limit, your fined. The law is set up to produce a good behavior. Since before we had the ACA, many ER's were full of people that needed routine care (which now takes place outside the ER). Today the ER is open for those that need actual emergency care.

That you did not read the ACA from start to finish is what bugs you about it. Conditioned to believe that all government actions are evil; you are unable to consider laws passed through Congress that are of real benefit to Americans. Since the release of health exchanges this time last year; 30 million Americans that did not have access, now can see a medical doctors without forking over $500/visit. In addition, each plan regardless of category, now offers many health checks as part of the plan (i.e. cancer screenings). Yes the ACA has its problems. But the problems I see for it, are different from yours. That's because I'm informed on the law and your ignorant of the law!

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
#7 Interesting that the foreign press shows a decrease of credibility for the U.S. after unilaterally interfering with the IAEA's work to curb bomb grade nuclear proliferation.


Do foreign journalists have push the American agenda like FOX 'news' does with the GOP/TP? Or are they like NPR and report good information even when it makes their supporters look bad?

Journalism should be about reporting good information free of bias or agendas of a shadowy nature. That twenty years ago there were as many as a hundred media companies in America. Now its less then seven. The cost of entry into the field being what it is, makes newcomers highly unlikely. Capitalism at its best! Curious how it becomes 'Corporate Communism' after a while....

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
#8 Yes, the GOP has major problems with very vocal loonies. Then, again, executive fiat is not how laws are made in this country.


Who would you rather have next to nuclear launch codes? Hillary Ciinton or any of the 'clown car' GOP/TP'ers running for office? More Americans will choose Hillary. Some will do it because they support her ideas and policies. Some will do it to support Democrats. And others will do it because she is the best candidate of the field running for the spot. If it becomes a Sanders/Hillary or Hillary/Sanders, tickets; the GOP has pretty much lost the election. Mrs. Clinton has moderates, Mr. Sanders has the liberals. That's well over 65% of the voting population. That's called 'winning in a landslide'.

In a twist of irony, Mr. Obama becomes the next Secretary of State!




thompsonx -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 1:10:48 PM)


ORIGINAL: subrob1967

I'll just leave this here.

Leave it to the Aussies to get it right (for once)
Modern Educayshun


Leave it to a mall cop to walk around with his head up his ass.




joether -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 1:13:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Unlike Liberal thought, conservatives have to be in 'lock step' with their 'comrades' on any given issue. Even on issues they dislike privately. That they can not publicibly state they are opposed to their party's beliefs. Which means they are more a prisoner to their ideology than liberals (i.e. less free of thought, ability, and conscious).

I guess explains why the Republicans are so united and their candidates are falling over each other in agreement. [8D]



Actually they are all in agreement on most of the issues. There are a few quirks here and there, but the grand majority of viewpoints is no different from one to the other. The greatest difference in viewpoints (it total viewpoints) would be between Donald Trump and Rand Paul. And that's like saying its +/- 3 degrees for tomorrow's temperature of 62; will most people 'feel' the difference? Not really.




thompsonx -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 1:53:57 PM)


ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I think that ignorant students should have lower grades.


Spoken like a school teacher.




bounty44 -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 2:08:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
1 ) President Obama is going down as the best US President for this century and millennium and now in the running for the top three best US Presidents


this is one of the more laughable things I have seen in the forums. you have long since ridded me of any shred of respect I have for your thoughts, but this is a new low.

apart the close to no win scenario cd put you in (good luck on that one), the rough consensus on the right (or just in general) is that he is amongst the worst of presidents---by what (insane) metric can you even begin to say what you just did?

not that I expect a legitimate answer or anything...but does this exist anywhere outside your liberal fantasy bubble?

quote:


ORIGINAL: joether

Unlike Liberal thought, conservatives have to be in 'lock step' with their 'comrades' on any given issue. Even on issues they dislike privately. That they can not publicibly state they are opposed to their party's beliefs. Which means they are more a prisoner to their ideology than liberals (i.e. less free of thought, ability, and conscious).


this laughable also---as with your first inane quote---apart from your putting yourself into an escapable corner that kirata neatly pointed out, do a quick internet search for "liberal groupthink" and one for "conservative groupthink" and let us all know the results. apparently you have been paying any attention at all to whats going on on college campuses, or any of the numerous threads here discussing it?

are you even capable of objective critical thought???




CreativeDominant -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 2:25:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
1 ) President Obama is going down as the best US President for this century and millennium and now in the running for the top three best US Presidents

So then...since your fetching adoration is clear...you agree with your hero regarding his stance on there being too much PC and drowning out of conservative thought at universities? As noted in the O.P.?



Unlike conservative ideology, CD, the liberals can agree or disagree with each other. That's what it means to follow the root concept of being liberal. Should look it up, its a Latin word: Liberalis. What you really do not understand is that the 'un-ugly' concept of Political Correctiveness is "Being a Professional". That some people were not be as professional as they should be given the circumstances that unfolded. An that is what the President was speaking on. That you do not understrand the concept nor what the President was stating, is nothing new. I can agree and disagree with the man.

Unlike Liberal thought, conservatives have to be in 'lock step' with their 'comrades' on any given issue. Even on issues they dislike privately. That they can not publicibly state they are opposed to their party's beliefs. Which means they are more a prisoner to their ideology than liberals (i.e. less free of thought, ability, and conscious).


Liberals don't have to be in lockstep?!? WHat the hell do you think political correctness s all about, birdbrain? As for differing viewpoints, show me just how much disparity there truly is between Hillary and Obama...Hillary and Sanders...Obama and Reid...Please and Reid.
O
You ate totally incorrect as to what the President was speaking on. Tis one reason I posted his words verbatim. So that a pompous little someone would not seek to "not, tut" us on what he meant.

Tell you what Joether; you've set yourself forward as the "one" able to state and explain how what he said is not what he said but rather as you explained it. Then prove it. Don't pretend for a minute that your explanation is anything other than your opinion. If you have proof...another article that states that he meant himself the way YOU explained it...or a personal letter to you...than your pompous little opinion is just like an asshole.




bounty44 -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 2:32:37 PM)

im sorry---is there a "conservative ideology" textbook somewhere that we all should be reading telling us about this "lockstep" thing??

has rush Limbaugh implanted something in our brains while we were sleeping maybe?




BamaD -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 2:40:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
1 ) President Obama is going down as the best US President for this century and millennium and now in the running for the top three best US Presidents

So then...since your fetching adoration is clear...you agree with your hero regarding his stance on there being too much PC and drowning out of conservative thought at universities? As noted in the O.P.?



Unlike conservative ideology, CD, the liberals can agree or disagree with each other. That's what it means to follow the root concept of being liberal. Should look it up, its a Latin word: Liberalis. What you really do not understand is that the 'un-ugly' concept of Political Correctiveness is "Being a Professional". That some people were not be as professional as they should be given the circumstances that unfolded. An that is what the President was speaking on. That you do not understrand the concept nor what the President was stating, is nothing new. I can agree and disagree with the man.

Unlike Liberal thought, conservatives have to be in 'lock step' with their 'comrades' on any given issue. Even on issues they dislike privately. That they can not publicibly state they are opposed to their party's beliefs. Which means they are more a prisoner to their ideology than liberals (i.e. less free of thought, ability, and conscious).


Liberals don't have to be in lockstep?!? WHat the hell do you think political correctness s all about, birdbrain? As for differing viewpoints, show me just how much disparity there truly is between Hillary and Obama...Hillary and Sanders...Obama and Reid...Please and Reid.
O
You ate totally incorrect as to what the President was speaking on. Tis one reason I posted his words verbatim. So that a pompous little someone would not seek to "not, tut" us on what he meant.

Tell you what Joether; you've set yourself forward as the "one" able to state and explain how what he said is not what he said but rather as you explained it. Then prove it. Don't pretend for a minute that your explanation is anything other than your opinion. If you have proof...another article that states that he meant himself the way YOU explained it...or a personal letter to you...than your pompous little opinion is just like an asshole.


This is much like his claim to have read the Iran deal at a time when even congress wasn't being given a copy of it. He must be on Obama's staff. Remember when he said that Liberals kept their more extreme people in check better than Conservatives do?




thompsonx -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 2:44:19 PM)

ORIGINAL: bounty44

im sorry---is there a "conservative ideology" textbook somewhere that we all should be reading telling us about this "lockstep" thing??

Don't you remember posting a link to it?[8|]




Lucylastic -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 3:13:15 PM)

More than once




lovmuffin -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/12/2015 7:12:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You don't know me nor do you know what I believe. The headline reads Europe scrambling for guns when all the article can come up with is Austria scrambling for guns. Even Austria scrambling for guns may have been exaggerated to some extent but the headline and article made a good discussion. I do however think (just so you know what I really believe) that those European countries letting in crap loads of Muslems is going to come back and bite them in the ass and joethers post up above is so way far out there in the universe where great sci-fi movies are made. His exaggerations don't even come close to the exaggeration in the headline of the European gun article.

Anything else you would liked to nit pick or should we look at your greatest achievements ?


I know you plenty well. Lacking of arguments, lacking of useful information, lacking of honesty. You know, the typical concepts that make up the modern conservative 'Low Information Voter' these days. Your 'attack' on the President and myself were both lame, silly, and stupid.

If my exaggerations are not true, please post your evidence to show for it. Oh that's right, you don't have any! If you had some, you would have used it in your post instead of the garbage bashing! What you dont like are two things: 1 ) President Obama is going down as the best US President for this century and millennium and now in the running for the top three best US Presidents; 2 ) I showed the 'big ticket' items the President has accomplished and you do not have a counter argument since they are all truthful and fully verifiable concepts.



You don't know me at all Birdbrain but I think I know you pretty well. Yer a little condescending liberal asshole *whom* isn't worth the effort to explain in detail your factual and logical fallacies and *whom* still doesn't know how to use the word "whom"......... you so smart. Why don't you write us up another one of your disertations on how the militia is the police and national gaurd for the tenth time or so.




bounty44 -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/13/2015 6:15:48 AM)

and back to the op...

saw this last night on the Kelly file (and loved megyn Kelly's frequent referals to "the cupcakes:" (no video here unfortunately but should be easy to hunt up)

quote:

Alan Dershowitz on College Protests: "Fog Of Fascism Is Descending," "These Students Are Book-Burners"

ALAN DERSHOWITZ: These are the same people who claim they are seeking diversity. The last thing these students want is real diversity, diversity of ideas. They may want superficial diversity, diversity of gender, diversit of color, but they do not want diversity of ideas.

We are seeing a curtain of McCarthyism descend over many college campuses I don't want to make analogies to the 1930s, but it was the college students who first started burning books during the Nazi regime. These students are book burners...

By expressing my opinion, I am "harassing students." This is becoming a very serious problem not only in American universities, but around the world. It is having a terrible impact on the education of students...

It is the worst kind of hypocrisy. They want complete control over their personal lives, over their sex lives, over the use of drugs, but they want mommy and daddy dean to please give them a safe place, to protect them from ideas that maybe are insensitive, maybe will make them think...

When I spoke at Johns Hopkins University, the same students who were talking about a 'safe space,' painted a Hitler mustache on my posters, it is an absolute double standard.

It is free speech for me, but not for thee. Universities should not tolerate this kind of hypocrisy, double standard…

If you’re going to be a college administrator or a professor, if you have tenure, you have to speak back to the students, you have to call these things what they are: double standards, hypocrisy, bigotry, McCarthyism, and the fog of fascism is descending quickly over many American universities.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/11/13/alan_dershowitz_on_college_protests_fog_of_fascism_is_descending.html




bounty44 -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/13/2015 6:17:18 AM)

and this is rich---imagine having this girl in your class:

quote:

Missouri Student VP: I'm Tired Of Hearing People Use First Amendment Rights To Create "Hostile" Atmosphere

Brenda Smith-Lezama, vice president of the Missouri Students Association, appeared on MSNBC Tuesday afternoon to express her disdain at people using their First Amendment rights to create a "hostile" and "unsafe" learning environment. Smith-Lezama advocated for a safe space for "healing" rather than "experiencing a lot of hate."

MSNBC host Thomas Roberts asked Smith-Lezama to respond to a professor who "complained" universities are becoming intolerant of opposing views.

"One professor complained universities are becoming places of prohibition," Roberts said. "What's your feeling? Do you believe that's a place we are heading for American campuses now? "

"I personally am tired of hearing that first amendment rights protect students when they are creating a hostile and unsafe learning environment for myself and for other students here," Smith-Lezama said on MSNBC. "I think that it's important for us to create that distinction and create a space where we can all learn from one another and start to create a place of healing rather than a place where we are experiencing a lot of hate like we have in the past."

Smith-Lezama said the treatment of a student journalist who was accosted on Monday should be a "teachable moment" for those who approach the protestors with "hostility."

"I think it's a teachable moment for all of us," she said of the incident. "I also think it's important to remember that as student journalists, you cannot approach these type of situations with hostility and with anger because it only escalates the situation."



http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/11/10/missouri_student_vp_im_tired_of_hearing_people_use_first_amendment_rights_to_create_hostile_atmosphere.html






Lucylastic -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/13/2015 6:38:25 AM)

Of course the fundy idiots on the right hate that the young are not bound by the restrictions that they, the older gen were. They want to restrict rights. Whinging about not learning from history, hypocritical to the enth degree when they want to "go back".
People have rebelled against the teachings of the church for a reason. they dont want to go back. Because there is no equality, no rights if not mentioned in the bible OR the constitution.





CreativeDominant -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/13/2015 8:17:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Of course the fundy idiots on the right hate that the young are not bound by the restrictions that they, the older gen were. They want to restrict rights. Whinging about not learning from history, hypocritical to the enth degree when they want to "go back".
People have rebelled against the teachings of the church for a reason. they dont want to go back. Because there is no equality, no rights if not mentioned in the bible OR the constitution.


It's not the "right" who Obama was talking about in the OP.

It's not a student from the right who wants to close down First Amendment rights in the name of "we can all just get along".





Lucylastic -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/13/2015 9:18:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Of course the fundy idiots on the right hate that the young are not bound by the restrictions that they, the older gen were. They want to restrict rights. Whinging about not learning from history, hypocritical to the enth degree when they want to "go back".
People have rebelled against the teachings of the church for a reason. they dont want to go back. Because there is no equality, no rights if not mentioned in the bible OR the constitution.


It's not the "right" who Obama was talking about in the OP.

It's not a student from the right who wants to close down First Amendment rights in the name of "we can all just get along".



And I didnt say it was. I was responding to the right wing fundy bullshit.
NOT the OP
its called thread drift.
One student doesnt make her the whole of liberalism or leftism, not one school makes it PC gone mad, or any bullshit....
ANy more than than one person calling for obama to be shot in the head, is YOUR view.
grow up




bounty44 -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/13/2015 11:54:28 AM)

The slow death of free speech

Majority Of Colleges Restrict Free Speech On Campus

Intolerant Liberals Shout Down Conservative Speakers

I’m a Liberal Professor, and My Liberal Students Terrify

Student Blogger Shut Down and Sued by Butler University

Brown University’s Campus Liberals vs. Free Speech

Oxford students shut down abortion debate

Free Speech And The 'Chilling' Laura Kipnis Allegation

Brown U. coddles students who ended free speech on campus

Conservative Speakers Unwelcome on Campus

Why are students forcing out commencement speakers

and on and on and on...




bounty44 -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/13/2015 12:02:22 PM)

Kirsten Powers’ new book The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech surveys the political landscape of the past couple years and finds something new to worry about.

(unfortunately, strikethrough lines are showing up on the preview and im not able to get rid of them)

quote:

A self-described liberal, Powers writes that the “illiberal left” is trying to dominate the discussion on campus, online and in the media through intimidation. In our discussion, Powers suggests there is an authoritarian impulse at play, one that has been gaining steam in the broader culture.

BN: You must have gone into this expecting some kind of backlash. How has that been so far? I’ve caught some if it on Twitter. What has your experience of it been?

KP: Yeah, it’s unpleasant and actually I’m not going on Twitter now because it’s very unpleasant and it’s precisely proving the point of my book, unfortunately. First of all, the people who are complaining haven’t even read the book. It was very clear because they keep misrepresenting what I’m saying. When you do try to engage them on the issue it become...No, we have to choose some toxic moniker to attach to you so we can shut down the conversation.

BN: One of the things I found interesting about the book is, with a few exceptions, the examples you give are really recent, often within the last two years. Do you see this as a peaking trend? Where are we in the evolution of this?

KP: That’s a really important point is that I didn’t have to go back 10 years to find examples. This is something that–especially even in the last year–this does seem to be something that has a sort of velocity. It just seems to be picking up steam. I don’t think that it has peaked and now it’s going to drop off. I think it’s moving in one direction and it’s going to keep moving unless people start pushing back against it and saying we can’t have a culture where people are not allowed to debate things and where we just shut things down this way. Because…it’s very authoritarian the way these people behave. They just have this idea that we have figured it all out, we know what people are supposed to think and we’re just going to hand it down to you and then if you push back against it we’re going to crush you.

BN: A lot of the incidents in the book take place on college campuses. You kind of play on the irony of that…Do you have a theory about why that might be?

KP: My goal was more to establish the fact that it was happening because whenever I would bring this up to people they would often bowdlerize and say, ‘Oh yeah, this is this crazy person at this university or this crazy person over here. Those are outlier events.’ And I really wanted to establish that, no, this is actually happening. This is not my opinion. It’s not a polemic, it’s a heavily researched book including interviews with people to establish this is a real phenomenon, a real cultural phenomenon that needs to be addressed. I have theories on why this is happening but they are not completely fleshed out. One of them is that the people who do this really behave like religious zealots. They have their current capital ‘T’ truth and they cannot tolerate or will not tolerate people who think differently. And it’s actually sort of an assault on them, on their being. I don’t know if that is because this has now become the sort of social signaling issue where, you know, ‘this is who I am’ much in the way a religion would be, an identity issue that I believe all these things that are right. Like I said it’s a very authoritarian impulse… I will not tolerate. It’s not just that they’re over here kind of thinking the things that they think. They’re going the extra step of saying other people can’t say things differently or even, if you look at the speeches on campuses, a speaker who is coming to speak to the young Republicans or the young Libertarians. It’s not just that they don’t want to hear it it’s that they don’t want anybody else to hear it. That’s where you get into dangerous territory. Very few people are taking the extra step of trying to shut down other people hearing from people this group disagrees with.

BN: If you look at the chronology of the examples in the book, one of the earliest ones is the White House going after Fox News. Do you think there’s any sense in which the White House normalized this behavior to some degree? It continued with the “war on women” in 2012.

KP: I do think that they did. I think this was something that was already happening without them but certainly by having the President of the United States engage in this behavior it was normalizing it. It was normalizing the idea that you can do the delegitimizing–and that was exactly their language, that Fox News was not a legitimate news organization. And again, not just that we’re not going to talk to them–which is not okay for the government–but they we’re also telling other people not to treat them as a legitimate news outlet. They’re taking an extra step of telling everyone else what they’re supposed to do and it’s intimidating. To me this was a very serious issue. I do think, like I said, if George Bush had done something like this to a media organization people would’ve been screaming from the rooftops, including me. But for some reason this was something that really got very little pushback. There were a few reporters–namely Jake Tapper was probably the main one who said ‘you know, this isn’t okay’–but for the most part it was just accepted.





mnottertail -> RE: Intetesting Take From Obama (11/13/2015 12:09:45 PM)

well, nobody who has any intellect wants to listen to more lying propaganda from nutsuckers, it is rife in society now.





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625