freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Help me with my depressive sub (11/23/2015 1:13:37 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze If you think so and decide to twist the facts so they suit you and deliberately ignore the fact that the medical research suggests there is a genetic link, up to you, you know I spent 3 years as a postgrad in a rather fabulous clinic (the European Heart Center, now merged with the European Society of Cardiology) where there was a whole department of professors just studying the genetic links and risk factors how genetics are related to cardiovascular problems and they all came to that conclusion. Different ball of wax. We are talking bipolar here, not cardiovascular problems. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze Since you decided it's fear mongering, inconclusive and unproven, would you mind letting me know your medical credentials and please make sure to also inform the European Society of Cardiology, I'm sure they are delighted to know that they are all wrong... If you keep up with the development of modern medicine, you would have heard about certain facts. Same comment as above. I read the links you gave and also what you actually quoted and they seem to support my views more than your previous quote of "...But bipolar tends to be genetic" quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze But hey, if you think that every website who mentions (in the first place) that genetics are a risk factor supports your position that genetics are not a risk factor, then there is really no point arguing with somebody who doesn't recognize logic. I never said that genetics are not a risk factor - just that they are not the main source as you previously stated in that "... tends to be genetic". In fact, all of your links are saying quite the contrary: that there may or could be a genetic link (nothing conclusively proven) but more likely to be "environment and lifestyle issues have an effect on the disorder's severity". The only piece of 'evidence' in your links stated "There is also growing evidence that environment and lifestyle issues have an effect on the disorder's severity. Stressful life events -- or alcohol or drug abuse -- can make bipolar disorder more difficult to treat." which supports my opinion rather than yours. Perhaps you should read a little more carefully. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze You might want to look up "proof of concept" in medicine, very strong theories and established methods of treatment aren't considered proven, even if they use the treatment routinely before not all scientific parameters are established. Our bodies have thousands of chemical and electrical reactions, mental illnesses aren't all that different from other problems, certain types of cancer are linked to genetic defects, it's pretty naive to believe that mental illnesses are something completely else (it's a chemical imbalance), yes you can get colon cancer from living unhealthy but you can also inherit the gene. So if you are genetically disposed to have a chemical imbalance that leads to bipolar, you will need a lot less of a trigger than somebody who does not have the genetic disposition. That's simply being proactive and trying to stay healthy Again, I never said that mental illnesses are completely different. But like most people on this planet, until someone comes up with clinical evidence to show that there is a genetic defect that causes bipolar and that it tends to be genetic rather than could be genetic, I still say you are overstating something that is unproven and certainly not of the "tends to be" order of importance that you implied. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze In case you still think it's fear mongering, I suggest you look up breed related problems in animals, due to their shorter life-span and faster reproductive cycle it's a lot easier to collect the medical data. And this has precisely what to do with bipolar may I ask?? Let's take your links and take something from each of them.... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14978466: Bipolar disorder genetics has progressed rapidly in the last few decades. However, specific causal genetic mutations for bipolar disorder have not been identified. So.... not been identified = no proof at all. http://jmg.bmj.com/content/36/8/585.full: No gene has yet been identified but promising findings are emerging. That means inconclusive or unproven as yet. http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v12/n4/abs/ng0496-427.html: Strong support for a genetic aetiolog is found in the familial nature of the condition, th increased concordance of monozygotic ove dizygotic twins2 and adoption studies showing increased rates of illness in children of affecte parents3. However, linkage studies have met wit mixed success. An initial report of linkage on th short arm of chromosome 11 (ref. 4) was revised5 and remains unreplicated. Mixed success plus unreplicated = inconclusive. Studies were only carried out in 12 families.... out of 7 billion people on this earth, is that realistic???? quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze You know academical and medical research is very expensive and needs funding, they wouldn't get funding without pretty solid reason They only fund stuff (usually by big pharmaceutical companies) because they think there might be some huge profit in the long run. ETA: As for the OP, her sub has a condition that she cannot cope with and certainly does not have the expertise to deal with - that's the simple answer.
|
|
|
|