RE: Don't be a creeper

RE: Don't be a creeper (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

ExiledTyrant -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 4:44:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: crumpets Many times, I've pulled up to a gas pump and asked the person filling up next to me why they chose the gas that they chose. Almost invariably, they said they put in the high-octane rated fuel because, they felt, it was "better" gas, or, if they were putting in the low octane rated fuel , they said that they put in the "good stuff" periodically, to keep their engine clean and running well. I used to try to explain to them what an octane rating was, to show them the fallacy of their beliefs, but, eventually I gave up. Basically, anyone who inherently feels that high octane rated fuels are better than lower-rated fuels, doesn't have the mental capacity to understand the truth. Obviously you do not own a Porsche.

Greta75 -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 4:44:13 PM)
quote: My point is that most women are being duplicitous when they make that statement. In fact, it seems that many women find EVERY OPPORTUNITY they can to shove their panties in our faces so that they can appear more interesting to us. This was your point. Women like to look pretty, doll up, and wear whatever they think look good on themselves. It's about them, how they like themselves to look and not about seeking attention. Most women don't dress with men in their minds. Now here is the problem. Especially in my country where it's 91F 365 days of the year, and 100% humidity, you start sweating the moment you finish showering. We definitely do not want to cover up and we like wearing as little clothes as possible to stay cool. And men like you are gonna accuse us of "flaunting our body parts in your face". I infact am always naked in the privacy of my own home because it's too hot. I wish I could walk naked outside without being leered at, but it's impossible and it's against the law.

ExiledTyrant -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 4:46:25 PM)
FR~ At the nudist colony it's that slut that's wearing the sarong that's really asking for it.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 4:46:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: crumpets Almost invariably, they said they put in the high-octane rated fuel because, they felt, it was "better" gas, or, if they were putting in the low octane rated fuel , they said that they put in the "good stuff" periodically, to keep their engine clean and running well. I used to try to explain to them what an octane rating was, to show them the fallacy of their beliefs, but, eventually I gave up. Basically, anyone who inherently feels that high octane rated fuels are better than lower-rated fuels, doesn't have the mental capacity to understand the truth. Ummm.... Crap!! Pure unadulterated bullshit. If I put a fuel octane of less than 95 in my car - the engine fucks up and the accelerator thingy that controls the fuel also fucks up at £1,200 a pop. Plenty of forums all over the place saying not to put in lower octane fuel because of the problems it causes. I have used lower octane when funds have been a tad short and I notice the difference... a LOT.

ExiledTyrant -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 4:47:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: crumpets Almost invariably, they said they put in the high-octane rated fuel because, they felt, it was "better" gas, or, if they were putting in the low octane rated fuel , they said that they put in the "good stuff" periodically, to keep their engine clean and running well. I used to try to explain to them what an octane rating was, to show them the fallacy of their beliefs, but, eventually I gave up. Basically, anyone who inherently feels that high octane rated fuels are better than lower-rated fuels, doesn't have the mental capacity to understand the truth. Ummm.... Crap!! Pure unadulterated bullshit. If I put a fuel octane of less than 95 in my car - the engine fucks up and the accelerator thingy that controls the fuel also fucks up at £1,200 a pop. Plenty of forums all over the place saying not to put in lower octane fuel because of the problems it causes. I have used lower octane when funds have been a tad short and I notice the difference... a LOT. Bad ass spark knock, eh?

Greta75 -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 4:50:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SweerbutMental quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: I have never heard a woman call it leering when she is dressed in a turtleneck aMr sone git stares... You got to be kidding me. I've definitely seen women with huge boobs in a turtle neck being leered at. Men notice big boobs like no body's business. We'll goodness its hard to chime in when such generations are made, so are you saying all men like big boobs or that only men who like big boobs leer.... I prefer smaller myself so perhaps that's the problem? Small berated women are not insulted unless they dress a certain why? You do I hope see the complete ignorance of your claims now. I have nothing more to add. You just case in pointed everything I was going to argue. My point is, women in big boobs in turtle necks get leered at. You said women never get leered at IF they were in turtle necks. A flat chested woman in tank top and braless wouldn't even be leered at. Because their chest would look like a male chest wearing tank top. I am a flat chested woman, so if you say I am insulting myself, then fine. I have no boobs at all, and I don't need bra. I don't suffer the same problems my big boobs girlfriends suffer. There's nothing to look on my chest. But if a woman with big boobs wears tank top, she's gonna be seen as dressing provocatively, when all she wants to do is keep cool. I had my rock climbing coach chastise a friend of mine with big boobs for wearing a tank top, when ironically, there were 8 of us ladies, and ALL of us were wearing the same tank top, different brands and colours but ALL of us were wearing tank top. 7 of us were flat chested, so it looks conservative. Yet my big boob girlfriend got singled out and told to cover up and dress more decently. And we were climbing in a hot hot outdoor wall in strong heat and humidity, with no shelter, at the full mercy of the sun! We all wanted to wear as little as possible. Get my point? Women should be allowed to wear what they want without stupid men like you sexualising them.

HoneyBears -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 4:50:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze I don't make you watch football buster, unless you're incapable of using the remote and I influence it with my evil psychic powers, but that's fairly unlikely Hahahahahahahahaha ... Whose idea was it crumpets, to have teams form cheerleading squads? Who perpetuates this American tradition? Men. It was originally men with vested interests in racking in the dough making football the most popular spectator sport there is, when it used to be baseball a little over half a century ago. It was a tactical marketing decision. Attractive women catch men's interest. Hot babes sell the latest model sports car. Women are seen as part of a champion's prize. The illusion of sexuality sells. As if Madison Avenue does not have a hand in using sex appeal, sexiness, and sexual innuendo to promote what products get pushed onto consumers, to both men and women alike. But this one's even funnier quote: ORIGINAL: SweerbutMental ill stop objectifying and sexualizing women as soon as women stop doing it to men. I cant count how many times I have seen women stop to objectify and sensualize the shirtless construction worker or jack hammer operator... Why is it that male models are trim and fit and defined by most women as attractive... Objectification at it's finest Fashion models are not representative of the average person's physique and are chosen by fashion designers for branding purposes. Metrosexual-looking GQ models are chosen by male fashion designers to appeal to men, not women customers. You have a problem with women stopping to objectify men? Now I have heard it all. You wish, and in your dreams.[sm=LMAO.gif] -- Cub

crumpets -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 4:56:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic we have to live with our tits, wether we are young, old, pretty or plain, fat or skinny, 24 hours a day 365 days a year for our entire life after puberty. Wether we have big tits, small tits, lopsided tits, huge tits, bee stings on shoulder blades the whole 9 yards. We not only see them, feel them, touch them, let them breathe the open air Half the population have them. Or will have them. What's different with cocks? We have to live with having our cocks sway about. Some are tiny. Some are huge. All hang outside our bodies, most of us further than your teats do. Yet, somehow, against all odds, we manage to keep our cock hidden from public view. Why is that? I can clearly see things from your frame of reference. But, for two people to agree, they have to visualize the same problem from both frames of reference. That means, in addition to me clearly understanding your point, you also need to also see things from my frame of reference. I pole vaulted in high school. I kept my cock under wraps. I wrestled. I kept my cock under wraps. I played football. Rest assured, my cock stayed in my pants (with a cup around it, for protection). Yet, the average girl in high school has to live under a dress code put in place by the administration just so that she won't blatantly show her teats to everyone in the entire school, just for her own attention whoremongering purposes. Yet, she would then have the audacity to complain that the boys leer at her when she's showing off her boobs (which aren't nearly the size of our cocks so if we can keep them under wraps, she can too). quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic But how dare we enjoy our OWN sexuality and expect the other half of the population not to think he has the right to grope, ogle, touch, pinch, and slaver over. How dare we. Well, you may be responding to someone else, but, I never used the word "grope" or "touch", or "pinch" or even slobber over. I just said "look". You can describe to me how you differentiate from "noticing", "looking" and "leering". For example, how long is the delta between merely "looking" and "leering" anyway? Is it 2 seconds? 5 seconds? 8 seconds? And, would everyone agree with your definition of leering? Point is, you are arbitrarily defining this term "leering" which is impossible to define at one end and very easy to define at the other (more obvious) end of the spectrum. I just said the devil is in the details when it comes to what constitutes leering and to what constitutes provocative clothing. quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic You poor men are only victims and not responsible...that right there is creepy, dumb and pathetic reasoning. The fact that you have only young pretty women shown in your examples is an indication of your bias. I must assume that you're speaking about someone else because I NEVER said, intimated, nor implied that we men are the victims. In fact, we're the beneficiaries of women's tendencies to shove their sexual parts in our faces day in and day out. We're not the ones complaining! I for one, absolutley LOVE seeing women half nekked! Many women show their panties all the time and you don't see me tapping them on the shoulder to say not to do that. No sir. Show me all the panties and crotches and boobs and cameltoes and ass cracks you can. I'm up for it. In fact, I ENCOURAGE women to dress like sluts even though, obviously, most don't need my encouragement because that's the natural tendency anyway for most women. Now, having said that, let's get some things very clear. My entire argument is that you women (most of you anyway) are not being honest with yourself. I'm not complaining in the least. I have never been accused of leering. And I certainly have never groped anyone inappropriately in public. Do you know this is the 100th anniversary of Einstein's fundamental theory of general relativity? One thing you have to do, to understand physics, is to step out of your normal frame of reference. If you don't step out of your natural frame of reference, you never see the big picture. I'm just trying to get you to see your own actions in a frame of reference outside of your natural one. If you can't understand what I'm trying to tell you, that just tells me that you're probably incapable of understanding another point of view from another reference frame. [image]https://i.ytimg.com/vi/FlWCsqosM68/0.jpg[/image]

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 4:56:41 PM)
I wish! ET. It's a known problem that these cars are built to run on the high octane fuel used in Japan. And with a direct injection system, it pretty much fucks up completely with lower octane fuel. I've seen the results in scrap yards over here. It usually means a complete new engine; a decoke and clean doesn't work. Strangely enough... it tells you in the Owners Manual to make sure you use 95 or better octane. So crumpets' assertion that it's all manufacturer's hype is pure bullshit. Like most of what he and his socks post.

ExiledTyrant -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:00:08 PM)
I have a Porsche that requires high octane. I work A LOT and don't drive it much, so it'll sit for a few months and if the fuel degrades, which it does over time (particularly over the winter), I'll get spark knock... that's the precursor to "you're fucked, buddy".

PeonForHer -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:08:14 PM)
quote: Lucylastic: But how dare we enjoy our OWN sexuality and expect the other half of the population not to think he has the right to grope, ogle, touch, pinch, and slaver over. That chimes for me. However ... quote: Greta75: Women like to look pretty, doll up, and wear whatever they think look good on themselves. It's about them, how they like themselves to look and not about seeking attention ... That doesn't, quite so much. It's counterintuitive because, to me, one blindingly obvious motivation behind the way I dress is to attract the attention of women. It's not the only motivation, sure - I have (what I like to think is) my own sense of style, which involves expressing my character and personality ... but I'd never deny that a big part of what goes into my choice of attire is going to be whether or not I think it'll be attractive to women. I get a new partner, I pretty much wear what she wants me to wear. Likewise with hairstyle. I don't care. My appearance is largely for others, not for me. It strikes me that 'dressing sexy' is a great and fun thing to do, for either sex. Also: Admiring looks, even lustful looks - they're fine, right up to the point at which they become aggressive or threatening. The key thing for me is that for women in our present society, 'aggressive' and 'threatening' mean something entirely different to what they mean for men. Or so I've vaguely concluded, anyway.

Greta75 -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:13:19 PM)
Personally, for me, I like to dress comfortable. You know, this means braless, pantyless. Because I find underwear uncomfortable. I always hated wearing bras! They are suffocating, and if I do wear them, I wear them super loose for comfort. But comfort dressing could be seen by men as "intentionally dressing provocatively". While a big boob woman could wear a good sports bra and turtleneck, and still get leered at. For me to get leered at, all I need to do is go braless and when you can see the tits sticking out through the clothes. I hate wearing bra, and I hate that I get stares if I don't wear bra. I hate make up cuz it's uncomfortable too so I never wear any. I don't wear high heels as they are uncomfortable. My whole dressing is all about comfort.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:15:18 PM)
I use mine every day and I certainly notice if I get a slack week when it's hardly used at all. If I think I'm going to have a slow week, I make sure there's not a lot of fuel in it and creep round the corner to my local BP and splash a few gallons in so I don't get that problem. I had a spare one sitting on the garden for a while until I sold it. I used to scoot down the motorway once a month to blow out the cobwebs after refueling. The one time I didn't, it sounded like the bottom was about to drop out!! When it came to sell it, I put half a tank of 97 in it and gave it a fast run - sounded as sweet as honey [:)] I didn't go above 120mph coz I didn't trust the bushes and suspension or the steering rack. Considering what work needed doing to it, I got a real good price. The guy was a creep. He managed to get a hooky test certificate and taxed it within 48 hours. I reported him to the police coz there's no way, even if he owned a fully-kitted garage and had all the parts on the shelf could he have done it in that short space of time. I haven't seen the car around here since then. I guess he got collared! [8D]

crumpets -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:16:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 And with a direct injection system, it pretty much fucks up completely with lower octane fuel. Oh jeez. Another complete idiot. Direct injection, while rare, has nothing in and of itself to do with the anti-knock quality of fuels and any specific engine's need for such. If you had said something about the compression ratio, then I'd take you more seriously; or the need to lower nitrogen oxide levels by recirculating gases; or the need to keep the engine cool under load, such as towing trailers, etc., but, direct fuel injection? BTW, I helped write portions of the Gasoline FAQ which you can still find on the Internet (along with Bruce Hamilton, who was the major author). quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 I've seen the results in scrap yards over here. It usually means a complete new engine; a decoke and clean doesn't work. Wow. Just wow. You are like the women here who know absolutely nothing, yet, you think you know everything! You do realize that the octane rating has absolutely NOTHING to do with the detergent level, per se? (Most people mix them up which is EXACTLY what advertisers want the dumbshits like you to do.) quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Strangely enough... it tells you in the Owners Manual to make sure you use 95 or better octane. Is that 95 the RON or MON or the AKI? Do you even know the difference? You do realize that the number of 95 is absolutely meaningless without that information, right? quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 So crumpets' assertion that it's all manufacturer's hype is pure bullshit. Like most of what he and his socks post. Heh heh ... I know octane ratings better than anyone you've ever met in your life. Better ... I have asked many scores of people what THEY THINK about octane ratings. I do this because I'm curious how people can be so clueless about something so obviously logical. That you have no clue what an octane rating even means, let alone how to make decisions between them, comes as no surprise to me. We can use misconceptions of octane ratings as a metaphor for the women who habitually dress like sluts yet who profess complete ignorance of why men look at them when they do so. Both take looking outside the frame of reference to understand the logic of it all. [image]http://www.autopten.com/carforum/images/gasoline-octane-rating-fuel-gas-station.jpg[/image]

LadyConstanze -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:21:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SweerbutMental Funny I think femists who fight for years to be able to dress provocatively and then bitch at men for looking or feminists who tell these girls to stop dressing that way because it is feeding into the sexualization of women and rape culture.. these women should all just fall off the earth as they fail at understanding human instict and believe laws of nature should not apply to men... We should rise above what comes normal.. I am sure google can direct you to the nearest cliff Oh please, take a long walk on a short pier If leering comes normal for you, maybe you should try to get socialized, we also have an instinct to smell, I hope you don't walk around and smell female crotches because you consider it coming naturally to you... As for men won't leer at a woman wearing a turtleneck, actually if anything a turtleneck will emphasize the breasts and through the high neck but being clingy look even more sexy than a low cut top... [image]http://www.exoticexcess.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/victorias-secret-turtleneck-sweaterdress.jpg[/image]

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:29:43 PM)
I don't give a fuck what you think. I don't care if it's RON MON or AKI. I also don't care how much detergent is in there either. My book says 95 or better. I look at the pump and make sure it meets that spec. That works for me and most people. That's ALL that counts. Lower than 95 on the pump - it don't run right. 95 is fine. 97 or better, it runs really smooth with no problems. I don't have to study the make-up of the fuel or anything. Like your other posts - MOST people don't go data mining to find this shit out because it's NOT FUCKING RELEVANT!! Nothing to do with being clueless. But everything to do with ensuring you abide by the instructions, whatever the fuck they say. Not knowing all the ins and outs of every fuel and lubricant just isn't fucking necessary and doesn't show any sense of lacking. And I don't give a flying fuck about what OTHER people think of octane ratings - it's none of my fucking business. They do what they want with their cars and I do what I want with mine. I make sure mine runs nicely and I don't care if they fuck theirs up. Nothing else matters.

Lucylastic -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:32:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: crumpets quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic we have to live with our tits, wether we are young, old, pretty or plain, fat or skinny, 24 hours a day 365 days a year for our entire life after puberty. Wether we have big tits, small tits, lopsided tits, huge tits, bee stings on shoulder blades the whole 9 yards. We not only see them, feel them, touch them, let them breathe the open air Half the population have them. Or will have them. What's different with cocks? We have to live with having our cocks sway about. Some are tiny. Some are huge. All hang outside our bodies, most of us further than your teats do. Yet, somehow, against all odds, we manage to keep our cock hidden from public view. Why is that? I can clearly see things from your frame of reference. But, for two people to agree, they have to visualize the same problem from both frames of reference. That means, in addition to me clearly understanding your point, you also need to also see things from my frame of reference. I pole vaulted in high school. I kept my cock under wraps. I wrestled. I kept my cock under wraps. I played football. Rest assured, my cock stayed in my pants (with a cup around it, for protection). Yet, the average girl in high school has to live under a dress code put in place by the administration just so that she won't blatantly show her teats to everyone in the entire school, just for her own attention whoremongering purposes. Yet, she would then have the audacity to complain that the boys leer at her when she's showing off her boobs (which aren't nearly the size of our cocks so if we can keep them under wraps, she can too). quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic But how dare we enjoy our OWN sexuality and expect the other half of the population not to think he has the right to grope, ogle, touch, pinch, and slaver over. How dare we. Well, you may be responding to someone else, but, I never used the word "grope" or "touch", or "pinch" or even slobber over. I just said "look". You can describe to me how you differentiate from "noticing", "looking" and "leering". For example, how long is the delta between merely "looking" and "leering" anyway? Is it 2 seconds? 5 seconds? 8 seconds? And, would everyone agree with your definition of leering? Point is, you are arbitrarily defining this term "leering" which is impossible to define at one end and very easy to define at the other (more obvious) end of the spectrum. I just said the devil is in the details when it comes to what constitutes leering and to what constitutes provocative clothing. quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic You poor men are only victims and not responsible...that right there is creepy, dumb and pathetic reasoning. The fact that you have only young pretty women shown in your examples is an indication of your bias. I must assume that you're speaking about someone else because I NEVER said, intimated, nor implied that we men are the victims. In fact, we're the beneficiaries of women's tendencies to shove their sexual parts in our faces day in and day out. We're not the ones complaining! I for one, absolutley LOVE seeing women half nekked! Many women show their panties all the time and you don't see me tapping them on the shoulder to say not to do that. No sir. Show me all the panties and crotches and boobs and cameltoes and ass cracks you can. I'm up for it. In fact, I ENCOURAGE women to dress like sluts even though, obviously, most don't need my encouragement because that's the natural tendency anyway for most women. Now, having said that, let's get some things very clear. My entire argument is that you women (most of you anyway) are not being honest with yourself. I'm not complaining in the least. I have never been accused of leering. And I certainly have never groped anyone inappropriately in public. Do you know this is the 100th anniversary of Einstein's fundamental theory of general relativity? One thing you have to do, to understand physics, is to step out of your normal frame of reference. If you don't step out of your natural frame of reference, you never see the big picture. I'm just trying to get you to see your own actions in a frame of reference outside of your natural one. If you can't understand what I'm trying to tell you, that just tells me that you're probably incapable of understanding another point of view from another reference frame. [image]https://i.ytimg.com/vi/FlWCsqosM68/0.jpg[/image] Since I was 23 I have been selling lingerie, adult toys, BDSM accouterments on and off, both retail, parties, vending at various cons and events around the country, in the US canada, and the UK. as a full time AND a part time job. I know my business. I know what sells to women, to men and to couples. Ive sold as many lingerie items to men as I have to women, I had an online business for 10 years selling plus size lingerie, and sex toys by the truck load. I now sell corsets. my first foray into online was to put up a website of avatars, in 1997 All nude and or erotic & fantasy for BDSM and ADULT pages. Ive done toy parties at rugby clubs, police clubs and working mens clubs. Ive done parties for post teen girls, I ve done parties for middle aged housewives and grannies who want a damn good laugh, both at themselves and the men that would have loved the lingerie. Im not uptight, or a prude, im very open sexually since I was a teen and yes have fought against dumb men(and some women) who want to congratulate me for being open minded or a slut for living the talk and believing its ok to be a wanker because ohhhh I like sex. I like sex, but with WHO I CHOOSE. I love erotica, sex and BDSM in large amounts. I have tits and a big ass. Always have had, always will have.I still get hit on when Im wearing a winter coat and wellies. You have the nerve to tell me I dont understand how it works...yet you clearly have no idea what women are or want, or believe. It shows in every post. By the way, your balls are not located beneath your chin, and generally we do not talk to you with an eye on your package, no matter how large you think it is. here in Ontario, we can go topless. I did once. I was a lot younger. Now if I were to go topless, all the fucking idiot men would be "grossed" out, but why SHOULDNT I? I havent stopped enjoying my sexuality, or my body. You can no more make me believe that I have to cover up than you can make me hitch up my skirt or flash my nips. If you(generic) cant handle your responses to women or men, wether they are nekid, semi provocatively(objective) then its YOUR responsibility. CONSENT is there for a reason. You see you go to the "women dressing like sluts"...automatic shaming. That is YOUR view only. you like it that they are supposedly flashing off their bits for your attention. No. honey when it comes to women its as obvious as your supposed huge dick being covered in glow paint that you know NOTHING about women, and are trying to blame shame and feel superior in something you cant even possibly understand. And no IM not talking about other men, just you.

Dvr22999874 -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:32:33 PM)
Good on yer F.D.........................as long as my car gets me from A to B comfortably and fairly quickly and then brings me back to A again in the same way, I really don't give a shit. Who the hell wants to know what's at the far end of a bee's knee ?

crumpets -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:38:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 When it came to sell it, I put half a tank of 97 in it and gave it a fast run - sounded as sweet as honey Ah, the devil is in the details! That sentence is apropos because people who don't understand the first thing of what an octane rating is would say something like that, which is what the women here are saying when it comes to how they dress and what the ramifications of that are with respect to men looking at them. If you take your statement that you "put half a tank of 97" in it, we have to assume that's a "good thing". Then we have to ask "why". Since I already mentioned the number 97 is meaningless as an octane rating without specifying whether it's the RON, MON, or AKI, I took the liberty of looking at your profile. Since you're apparently in the UK, that means you're under the RON system, which is different than our AKI system we use here in the USA. Assuming you had half a tank of fuel already in the gas tank, and presuming that was "regular", which, in the UK, is normally 95 RON, mixing half a tank of 95 RON and half a tank of 97 RON gets you exactly the equivalent of 96 RON which is an equivalent anti-knock index to a test fuel of 96% iso-octane and 4% n-heptane. So, you brought your engine's fuel from the equivalent anti-knock index of 95% iso-octane (actually it's 95% 2,2,4,tri-methyl pentane, but, colloquially it's called an "octane", and, even an "iso-octane", which all the chemists on this board, if any, will fully appreciate the humor of) to an equivalent of 96% iso-octane. Now, tell me, since I happen to understand this stuff rather well (just as I do understand why women wear the clothes that they do and yet find time to complain about the predictable reactions from men) ... tell me ... how exactly do you feel that changing the anti-knock quality of the fuel from an equivalent of 95% iso-octane to 96% iso-octane is going to make the engine "sound as sweet as honey"? Your premise makes absolutely no logical sense where the devil is in the details. Just like the premise of the (some of the) women here who complain that men are looking at them when they (some of them anyway) are shoving their crotches in men's faces daily. [image]http://en.citizendium.org/images/a/af/Iso-octane_and_n-Heptane.png[/image]

LadyPact -> RE: Don't be a creeper (12/1/2015 5:44:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SweerbutMental ill stop objectifying and sexualizing women as soon as women stop doing it to men. I cant count how many times I have seen women stop to objectify and sensualize the shirtless construction worker or jack hammer operator... Why is it that male models are trim and fit and defined by most women as attractive... Objectification at it's finest Really? Where do you live because where I live, in those occupations, shirts are required by OSHA.

Page: << < prev 6 7 [8] 9 10 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875