DD/lg - Little girl <3

DD/lg - Little girl <3 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Introductions] >> Introduce yourself

Message

heavenlylittle -> DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/5/2015 3:51:09 AM)
Salutations! I am a little and I'm learning as a submissive. I was introduced to collarspace from Fetlife and I'm hoping to make new friends on this site. I am friendly, sweet, shy, charming, and incredibly sassy. Let me tell you, I do not like age-play, Disney, or ABDL. Age-play and ABDL is a kink where it makes me nauseous and uncomfortable. Disney is an evil company that animates subliminal messages leading children to hyper-sexualization. True story. Like all littles, we have our own quirks. My little's name is Lauren. If you have a preferred name, let me know! I joined collarspace to meet like-minded individuals and a supportive community. The layout of collarspace is very 2005 and I hope mods will do anything to update their collarspace setting to a more appreciative design. If you like what I like and you're in the age range between 22 to 35, feel free to message me. If you're not, don't. Thanks, Lauren

Delilya -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/5/2015 7:49:17 AM)
Welcome to the forums. Best of luck on your journey.

LadyConstanze -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/5/2015 7:54:31 AM)
Welcome... Though I'm a bit curious, isn't being a little a form of age play?

heavenlylittle -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 6:10:48 AM)
Thank you, Delilya and Lady Constanze! Lady Constanze, good point! Though little girls do regress to a young age, age-play isn't required for a DD/lg relationship to be successful. There are submissives who are babygirl/boys and they're different to a little girl/boy. Some DD/lg include age-play and some don't. For me, age-play is sucking on pacifiers, wearing bibs, diapers, or any activities that would result into a huge mess. I do like it when a Daddy puts on my knee high socks on for me, brushes my hair, and takes care of me, but anything that involves a huge mess to clean up afterwards is not my cup of tea. I could say that I'm a neat freak but ABDL and age-play activities related to that level is a red no-no.

LadyConstanze -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 6:18:12 AM)
LOL, I'm not a fan of messes and diapers are definitely a hard limit, but you can do age play without a mess. I always understood age play as the people indulging it assume a different age than they are in reality. For example I once played the mother of a blushing bride (a guy pretending to be a virgin bride and I had to give him the "facts of life" and what happens in the wedding night) he was over 80, he could have been my great great grandpa at the time. No mess involved but definitely age play ;)

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 6:54:10 AM)
Surely DD/lg is the absolute epitome of age play?? I seriously cannot envisage it as being anything else. Spin it whatever way you want - DD/lg is definitely age-play.

Greta75 -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 7:02:42 AM)
FR Definitions, definitions. The whole DD/LG thing has always made me uncomfortable precisely because I associate it with age play. And the whole diaper thing and all that stuffs you mentioned, are just one of the sub kinks in age play that is not necessary in many age plays. Everything you said you like are still age-play stuffs. But that's just me. I have a very uncomfortable relationship with my parents, so any format that makes me feel motherly to someone, or make someone feels fatherly to me, starts making me feel extreme discomfort about it.

LadyPact -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:12:59 AM)
Welcome to the forums, Lauren, though I'll probably call you heavenlylittle or hl for short. Ah, so you read that article about certain Disney films? I read that myself not so long ago. It was an interesting take. I know some folks think littles or those who engage in DD/lg dynamics automatically equal age play. Most of the littles that I know don't, so I'm sure your perspective will be welcome. The little community has grown a lot in the last five years or so. At least, that's what I've seen.

heavenlylittle -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:15:21 AM)
Greta75, While I understand where you are coming from, I assure you DDlg isn't a fantasy derived from incest. Calling a Dominant "Daddy" is a form of admiration and it's form of affection earned by that Dominant. Daddies and Mommies don't have to be parents themselves, but bachelor/bachelorettes who find it exhilarating to be an authority figure/caretaker of another person. As for age-play, I'm aware of what age-play means in general; however, I still feel queasy towards diapers, pacifiers, bibs, or anything relative to infantilization. If you type in age-play in any social network's search engine, my hard limits are always mentioned and I have to repeat myself over and over again which quirks I don't explore and do. It's exhausting and I find it annoying every time I receive an invitation from a caretaker to participate in my hard limits. Honestly, if I said I don't like age-play, only a few will ask me why and that way, it causes less problems.

Greta75 -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:22:59 AM)
quote: While I understand where you are coming from, I assure you DDlg isn't a fantasy derived from incest. Calling a Dominant "Daddy" is a form of admiration and it's form of affection earned by that Dominant. Daddies and Mommies don't have to be parents themselves, but bachelor/bachelorettes who find it exhilarating to be an authority figure/caretaker of another person. As for age-play, I'm aware of what age-play means in general; however, I still feel queasy towards diapers, pacifiers, bibs, or anything relative to infantilization. As you said diapers, pacifiers etc, makes you feel queasy, same with the DDLG concepts makes me feel queasy. Perhaps because, I cannot imagine how "Daddy" is a form of admiration, other than just seeing him as a Father Figure. I'm just alot more comfortable with Dom/Sub, or Master and Slave. And I often view it in a manner of ownership, rather than fatherly relations or authority figures, which again, leads to fathers, steps fathers, guardians, teachers, etc all kinds of people you aren't suppose to have sex with. But end of the day, we all have our internal definitions of things. But my main point was, I believe the whole diaper, pacifier play, from all the "Daddy" types who have ever approached me, I've never encountered one who was into it. But perhaps because you specifically identify yourself as a little, that might attract more of those types. But generally what you described is the very definition of age play I think for alot of people.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:32:49 AM)
The unfortunate thing is that age play is such a wide topic that encompasses all sorts of things (like BDSM in general) that there will always be bits'n'bobs that people don't indulge in. If you don't "do" infantilization and everything that goes with it, that's perfectly fine. Obviously there are some that do. [:'(] But to deny that it is age play is an oxymoron. From Wiki: Ageplay or age play is a form of roleplaying in which an individual acts or treats another as if they were a different age, sexual or non-sexually. From Urban Dictionary: Age play is the term for consenting adults who roleplay in some way pertaining to age. Sometimes this is "infantilism", which is adults acting as babies. There are all ages.. this can also include schoolgirl or schoolboy with headmaster or headmistress, and every conceivable age in between. From BDSMWiki: Ageplay is a type of Role-playing in which a person pretends to be an age other than their current biological age. While ageplay consisting of the s-type of being an elderly person exists, more common forms include roleplaying in the forms of infantilism, littles or adolescents.

LadyConstanze -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:37:49 AM)
Greta, I have the very same reaction as you do with the "daddy" term, and oddly enough I have friends who indulge in it and there is no incest play or anything there, in fact I think she is even older than the daddy in the relationship, it's just it kinda makes me feel odd but that's my reaction to it.

heavenlylittle -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:39:31 AM)
I'm not persuading you to enter DDlg but it just helps me to let you know that I'm against incest and pedophilia. Hell, I can't see my father as DD and I never will have any incestuous feelings for him. You can ask me why I'm interested in DD/lg because I will ask you this: quote: authority figures, which again, leads to fathers. Have you ever had a crush on a teacher?

heavenlylittle -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:42:50 AM)
Freedomdwarf1: It's easier to get rid of those interested in that kind and attract the right people. I know what age play is and your reaction is exactly the type of messages that barely reads my profile and goes straight to my bulk message.

Greta75 -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:52:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavenlylittle Have you ever had a crush on a teacher? I can honestly from the bottom of my heart said I have never. When I was a teenager, any boy more than 2 years older than me, was seen as too old for me. So teachers, I am never sexually attracted to at all. BTW, I wasn't accusing you of being into incest. I was just saying that what you like is still considered age play. I don't understand any of these, but on my end, I am not even against incest. I'm 100% for mutually consensual everything.

heavenlylittle -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:54:21 AM)
Thank you for welcoming me with open arms and considering my opinion! I appreciate your open-mindedness and I'm glad you're aware of different strokes for different folks. I would say Disney has shaped my over sexualization and I'm not fond of it at all. I'm glad I stopped watching it when I was in fifth grade.

Greta75 -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:57:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze Greta, I have the very same reaction as you do with the "daddy" term, and oddly enough I have friends who indulge in it and there is no incest play or anything there, in fact I think she is even older than the daddy in the relationship, it's just it kinda makes me feel odd but that's my reaction to it. The way I still process it. Let's say Daddy is 18 yr old. Little girl is 60 yr old, to be extreme. But it's still him imagining she's his baby and his her father. She playing a daughter, and he playing the father. I mean I am wondering exactly what are they imagining in their heads that turns them on. And it's probably father and daughter. It's a little like rape play. Do I want a real rapist to rape me? NO! Do I want to have sex with my real father? No. The closest I can understand it, is that.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 8:57:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavenlylittle Freedomdwarf1: It's easier to get rid of those interested in that kind and attract the right people. I know what age play is and your reaction is exactly the type of messages that barely reads my profile and goes straight to my bulk message. Then perhaps you ought to make that distinction clear in your profile rather than deny what you are doing is "age play". Someone not bothering to read a profile is unfortunately very common; on here and elsewhere. If I read a profile that described what they wanted as age play, then denied that it was 'age play', that tells me that they either don't know what the fuck they are on about or they don't know what they want - and I'd skip the profile completely.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 9:00:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze Greta, I have the very same reaction as you do with the "daddy" term, and oddly enough I have friends who indulge in it and there is no incest play or anything there, in fact I think she is even older than the daddy in the relationship, it's just it kinda makes me feel odd but that's my reaction to it. The way I still process it. Let's say Daddy is 18 yr old. Little girl is 60 yr old, to be extreme. But it's still him imagining she's his baby and his her father. She playing a daughter, and he playing the father. I mean I am wondering exactly what are they imagining in their heads. And it's probably father and daughter. Your problem, Greta, is that you are putting all the age play stuff into an incest-style context. Age play is not incest driven or motivated or even sexual in some cases. Sometimes you need to think outside the box.

Greta75 -> RE: DD/lg - Little girl <3 (12/6/2015 9:04:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Your problem, Greta, is that you are putting all the age play stuff into an incest-style context. Age play is not incest driven or motivated or even sexual in some cases. Sometimes you need to think outside the box. Then what is it motivated by? Authority figures are generally in real life people you shouldn't have sex with. How else is it processed? Even if it's your boss, technically, you shouldn't be having sex with him and he wouldn't be associated as Daddy anyway. In what circumstances can you age-play in a non-sexual manner? That does not involve a Fatherly figure with fatherly actions?

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625