WickedsDesire -> RE: I'm lost! (12/11/2015 1:04:07 PM)
|
I could answer this many ways *mulls* 1. Change your profile text, as darksteven suggests, let me look see if you’ve done anything. Refine and refine it over time. 2. Have you considered the dark arts, for bewitching purposes, 5 magic beans. 3. As OsideGirl says. The Ratio of men to women varies on each type of site. And is heavily skewed in favour of women 4. Join a swingers site but the ratio is about 100:1 on those places or worse. When I say 100:1 that is before I factor in women, or couples into that 5. Join the two most popular single sites, and hint a wee bity in your profile..I use the same profile everywhere on the 1-4 sites I can be bothered to go on. So the two main fetish sites and mainstream dating one – free. Not sure this is worth my time….but understand on fetish sites and swingers sites, if you are genuine, you will be competing with 100s of married (and fibbing about it and everything else) men. Competition is therefore exceptionally tough. Okay my time Scotland population 5.5million haggis and haggisettes and a sandal wearing loon with fondness for truisms cake and cats 7 cheap Chardonnay. Search parameters checked = pictures & dominant Number of female dominant profiles online in scotland since December = 14 (has it come to that on here – not my doing a shameful total) Pro domes = 6 Fake profiles =5 Genuine - I use that term loosely to encompass cheats too, benefit of the doubt profiles included = 3 Sighs I will do submissive men too without the breakdown = 75 and none of them will be pro and I can assure you the bulk attached and it Giving a ratio of 75 men: 3 genuineish women or 25:1 Your profile - the regulars have given you good advice. Its a shame so few people visit these forums. Personally I think if you delete the first section its actually not bad and be aware of the ratio and the demographic make up constituent parts - this means you have to plug away dear genuine ladies in no way am i saying all the 75 men are genuine and credible
|
|
|
|