Freedom of Religion (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Greta75 -> Freedom of Religion (12/16/2015 5:51:28 AM)

There is a popular moderate Muslim site called "answering christianity", it's suppose to be the GO TO site, to debunk all the misconception about Islam and prove that Islam is indeed the Religion of Peace.

http://www.answering-christianity.com/apostates.htm

So anyway, I was just curious about what moderate muslims nowadays come up with to try to say to justify why so many Muslims countries criminalise Muslims from leaving Islam.

This is what I found.

First of all, to be fair, they found this wonderful verse in the Quran which says, "Let there be no compulsion in religion.", but it's quite funny because what comes right after is how those who do not believe are gonna rot and burn in hell! Haha! Okay fine! That's just like Christians. Punishment after death. Sounds good to me!

After making me feel happy there is hope that there is such a verse in there for modernization. He completely destroys it by saying this:

quote:

Some group of Muslims believe in killing apostates because they follow a Hadith (Saying) from Prophet Mohammed peace be upon him regarding the apostates. While Islam was weak and still growing among Jews, Christians and Pagans, Muslims did not have the full and complete religion that they needed. Some Jews and Christians wanted to take advantage of such situation to destroy Islam. They had a plan to adopt Islam first and then desert it, thus creating the impression that Islam was not a religion worth adopting.

Let us look at Noble Verse 3:72 "A section of the People of the Book (Jews and Christians) say: Believe in the morning what is revealed to the believers (Muslims), but reject it at the end of the day; perchance they may (themselves) turn back (from Islam)." To protect Islam from such Satanic attempts done by a group of the people of the book (Jews and Christians), Prophet Mohammed peace be upon him ordered the death of those who enter Islam and leave it. This temporary law that was put by our Prophet had stopped the hypocrites from the People of the Book who carried so much hatred toward Islam to enter Islam and desert it afterwards.

First of all, he thinks Muhammad is perfectly just and right in ordering the killing of pagans, christians and jews, who falsely entered Islam, just to leave the religion to encourage mass leaving of the religion?? He feels there is absolutely nothing wrong with this????? Did those Jews, Pagans, Christians physically attack the Muslims? No. They were peaceful. They did it in a peaceful manner. They were simply convincing people that his ideology is not the right ideology to follow. What's wrong with that?

Am I gonna kill anybody who convince my followers to turn away from the religion I created? How is this acceptable? It looks like according to him, I should be killed according to Muhammad. Since here I am convincing Muslims to leave Islam. And I have been doing that. So I sure hell ain't supporting a religion that is advocating death to me, just because I actively verbally convince Muslims to leave. I've even been a fake christian before, gosh, I should be thankful Christians didn't slaughter me for it!

BIG FAIL here! On moderate arguments! He really cannot deny that Hadith though, that's the problem. Even if it's not written in the Quran, Hadith is seen as authentic as the Quran for clearer information.

quote:

As we clearly see from the Noble Verses above, apostates are no longer to be killed in Islam. I am not here promoting apostates, but there is no reason to kill someone who doesn't deserve to be killed. Certainly if the apostate is hostile toward the Muslims and joins the enemy in a war against them, or tries to corrupt the Muslims in the Muslim lands by trying to convert them to his/her new deviant religion, then the matter becomes different. But if a Westerner today for instance embraces Islam for a while and then changes his position due to the overwhelming false anti-Islamic media, then certainly killing that person would be a grave sin and a big mistake.

This was his final conclusion, that he does not advocate killing of apostates, UNLESS they try to corrupt Muslims in Muslims land by converting them. I mean, fair enough, if they physically attack you, and want to physically hurt you, do defend yourself. But to go after those who want to verbally spread their religion in their lands? Come on! That's not Freedom of Religion. We allow Muslims to spread Islam in our lands and convert our people.

On top of this, he specifically mentioned, it's okay for western people to join Islam and then choose to leave. Why only specifically mention western people? What about born Muslims in Muslim countries? He didn't dare confirm that they could leave without consequences.

I am still not convinced there is freedom of religion in Islam. For me, on top of all their anti-women policies which will always rub me wrong being a woman, this is the worst part of their religion, is when people can't leave if they want to.

So if I am a bigot towards a religion like this. Then anybody who hates KKK and Nazis are bigots too. Fine. All 3 religions do not believe in freedom.

BTW, I thought I added a fundie Muslim website, and here they explain why "There is no compulsion in Religion" is abrogated in the true interpretation of the Quran in comparison to the moderate explanations which they try to debunk. I always like reading all sides of the argument. I think everyone should.




Real0ne -> RE: Freedom of Religion (12/16/2015 5:54:44 AM)

where is there freedom of religion?




Greta75 -> RE: Freedom of Religion (12/16/2015 6:21:49 AM)

quote:

where is there freedom of religion?

They are given sharia courts in my country, allowed to built mosque where-ever they want, open Muslim schools for their muslim children, we give them alot of freedom of their religion.
Many restaurants in a Muslim minority country even turn halal to cater to their religion.

You saying they don't have freedom in our countries?

I am pretty sure none of them will be put to death for converting people into Islam, for a start.

How is this amazing group of people able to have such hateful things in their religious text, and still get sympathizers for them?

Christianity gets torn into shreds for their old testament with no mercy and by right they should be questioned about it, we did a great thing there, by telling Christians they are NOT peaceful! Puts pressure on them to keep proving they are. I believe Christianity turn good because of massive condemnation of them in the first place. In fear of losing status as a "good religion", they gotta fix their problems, they did.

But Islam keeps getting defended and people don't call them out. It means that they can continue to do all their atrocities as specified in their holy text while having the luxury of being defended by sympathizers as peaceful people.

It boggles my mind.

I believe for Islam to have a chance to modernization, they have to keep getting called out and challenged on their religious text. So they can keep cracking their brains on how to modernize it in a way where it can make sense to majority of Muslims.

At the moment, this explanation above in my OP does not cut it.




Staleek -> RE: Freedom of Religion (12/16/2015 6:49:53 AM)

This site is not the GO TO site for anything. I had a look, I mean....

http://www.answering-christianity.com/911_is_the_biggest_lie.htm

...what the hell?!

It's not even entertaining. This is much better.

http://timecube.com/

THAT'S how to post a GO TO delusional site you want to waste an afternoon, which is all these whack-job, tinfoil-hat, conspiracy, nutcase, end-of-the-world sites are actually useful for. I certainly wouldn't use one to try to make any point of substance, except maybe that mental health services are still woefully inadequate.




MrRodgers -> RE: Freedom of Religion (12/16/2015 6:59:08 PM)

The culprit here is organized religion, period.

Even the Dalai Lama (the last Dalai Lama) tells his followers now, that organized religion...is the problem. I personally agree when it becomes just to easy for one to decide for themselves...what their religious scriptures mean.

Your OP is an example. Because as for Christianity ? WOW, there was a time when you had better convert, then a time when all Catholics were to be killed and a time when even the Bible was banned.

Even Buddhists (the ultimate live and let live belief in spiritual guidance) in Burma, are giving Muslims a real problem.

How's this for a 'religious' belief ? I say they all ought to go to hell. Kinkroids, when you die, you go to sleep, you don't dream and you never wake up.




Greta75 -> RE: Freedom of Religion (12/17/2015 4:03:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Staleek
http://timecube.com/

THAT'S how to post a GO TO delusional site you want to waste an afternoon, which is all these whack-job, tinfoil-hat, conspiracy, nutcase, end-of-the-world sites are actually useful for. I certainly wouldn't use one to try to make any point of substance, except maybe that mental health services are still woefully inadequate.

How about you show me what you consider a good moderate muslim site then?
I really want to see a really good moderate muslim explanation about the freedom of religion issue in Islam.
Because this explanation has to tally with the quran and the hadith, so that all extremist muslims can be converted to moderation beliefs too.
I'm still curious if it exists.

I mean the site I put up as moderate is way more moderate than the other extremist site I put up there. That's as moderate as it gets!




Staleek -> RE: Freedom of Religion (12/17/2015 4:35:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: Staleek
http://timecube.com/

THAT'S how to post a GO TO delusional site you want to waste an afternoon, which is all these whack-job, tinfoil-hat, conspiracy, nutcase, end-of-the-world sites are actually useful for. I certainly wouldn't use one to try to make any point of substance, except maybe that mental health services are still woefully inadequate.

How about you show me what you consider a good moderate muslim site then?
I really want to see a really good moderate muslim explanation about the freedom of religion issue in Islam.
Because this explanation has to tally with the quran and the hadith, so that all extremist muslims can be converted to moderation beliefs too.
I'm still curious if it exists.

I mean the site I put up as moderate is way more moderate than the other extremist site I put up there. That's as moderate as it gets!


No. I don't want to link a good moderate Muslim site (although there are many) for two reasons:

1. You will only pass of such a website as being "oh that's just pro-Muslim"

2. The internet is shit. The point of me linking the time cube was to demonstrate to you that finding something on the internet does not tell you that the quality of that information is sound.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125