Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: hung Jury


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: hung Jury Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: hung Jury - 12/17/2015 5:10:12 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
It is very hard for good cops to respect others when they have no respect for the cops.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: hung Jury - 12/17/2015 5:35:39 PM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

It is very hard for good cops to respect others when they have no respect for the cops.



Would you want to try that again in English? My original message was

quote:

I honestly never really had trouble with the police and have a lot of respect for most of them, however this was a pretty shitty case and there were a lot of cases where I think they definitely went way way overboard, in my eyes, it's a bad thing because it diminishes the good cops who really joined because they want to do what's right. I'm kinda surprised that there isn't more of a movement from within the police force to clear those things up and regain trust and respect.


So what were you trying to say?

Let me clarify, I think the majority of cops do a great job, therefore they should be interested in not having bad apples who give all of them a bad name.

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: hung Jury - 12/17/2015 6:44:00 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

Yep. Pretty much waiting to see the reaction in the city. A lot of people tried to make sure the prior demonstrations were peaceful or kept peaceful. We'll see.


But they weren't, remember the give them room to destroy orders.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: hung Jury - 12/17/2015 6:48:22 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

I honestly never really had trouble with the police and have a lot of respect for most of them, however this was a pretty shitty case and there were a lot of cases where I think they definitely went way way overboard, in my eyes, it's a bad thing because it diminishes the good cops who really joined because they want to do what's right. I'm kinda surprised that there isn't more of a movement from within the police force to clear those things up and regain trust and respect.

I think the cops in the van, unless there has been even more evidence withheld, screwed up big time. Negligent homocide seems reasonable, but murder 2?

They must have changed something in the Baltimore Dept. considering how crime has skyrocketed since the Freddy Grey case came up.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 12/17/2015 6:50:40 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: hung Jury - 12/17/2015 6:56:11 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3679
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
I really don't see much hope for more than one or two convictions of the six charged. I'm thinking the prosecutor expected one of them to testify against all of the others, or some other TV court show drama.

By overcharging, the juries will all be confused. Go to court with charges you can prove without a reasonable doubt, even if you can only get one or two on even manslaughter.

Civil court would be much different, but then it will be the City on trial.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: hung Jury - 12/17/2015 7:15:25 PM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

I honestly never really had trouble with the police and have a lot of respect for most of them, however this was a pretty shitty case and there were a lot of cases where I think they definitely went way way overboard, in my eyes, it's a bad thing because it diminishes the good cops who really joined because they want to do what's right. I'm kinda surprised that there isn't more of a movement from within the police force to clear those things up and regain trust and respect.

I think the cops in the van, unless there has been even more evidence withheld, screwed up big time. Negligent homocide seems reasonable, but murder 2?

They must have changed something in the Baltimore Dept. considering how crime has skyrocketed since the Freddy Grey case came up.


I honestly don't know enough about the case, I recall I was in LA when it happened and found it shocking (there were several reports about police brutality at the same time) I was visiting a friend and he had a family member there, retired quite high ranking ex military guy, we were all shocked. I believe the parents were middle class and (pardon my French) it seemed dodgy as ****

Didn't they taser him and then just threw him into the paddy wagon without securing him and due to being restrained he sustained the injuries that lead to him dying? At least that's how I remember it.

I don't know enough about what charges can be brought on but here it would be reckless endangerment resulting in loss of life, which is pretty much like manslaughter due to negligence.

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: hung Jury - 12/17/2015 7:17:41 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

I really don't see much hope for more than one or two convictions of the six charged. I'm thinking the prosecutor expected one of them to testify against all of the others, or some other TV court show drama.

By overcharging, the juries will all be confused. Go to court with charges you can prove without a reasonable doubt, even if you can only get one or two on even manslaughter.

Civil court would be much different, but then it will be the City on trial.

The prosecutor has acted more like the head of a lynch mob than a prosecutor.
If she isn't careful any misconduct of the officers will get lost in her misconduct.
But really charging people who were never in the van and never had contact with Grey. Makes the whole thing look like a witch hunt and may end up providing cover for anyone who actually did anything wrong.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: hung Jury - 12/17/2015 7:27:48 PM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
I don't know if I am a cynic, but is the prosecutor trying to appease the masses and possibly aiming for a political career, hence going way overboard?

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: hung Jury - 12/17/2015 9:17:28 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

I don't know if I am a cynic, but is the prosecutor trying to appease the masses and possibly aiming for a political career, hence going way overboard?

It looks that way.
Which is not to say that none of the cops did anything wrong.
They failed to follow procedure, it requires them to put prisoners in seat belts.
It certainly seems that the officers in the van were at least negligent. I think to the point of criminality. But other than playing to the mob I can see no reason for charging everyone who got near the van.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: hung Jury - 12/18/2015 6:08:35 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

I don't know if I am a cynic, but is the prosecutor trying to appease the masses and possibly aiming for a political career, hence going way overboard?

It looks that way.
Which is not to say that none of the cops did anything wrong.
They failed to follow procedure, it requires them to put prisoners in seat belts.
It certainly seems that the officers in the van were at least negligent. I think to the point of criminality. But other than playing to the mob I can see no reason for charging everyone who got near the van.


By going overboard they are actually harming the case, it's actually stupid unless there is something going on in the background to give the guilty parties as little legal punishment as possible by deliberately effing up, which could be another angle, while appearing to be all gung ho about the case...

I think it might be pretty hard to find evidence that they wanted to deliberately hurt or harm the prisoner unless they'd admit to it, but he got harmed while being in their custody and due to their "neglect", I think that should be serious enough to throw the book at them.

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: hung Jury - 12/18/2015 6:43:59 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

Let me clarify, I think the majority of cops do a great job, therefore they should be interested in not having bad apples who give all of them a bad name.

Yes. One would think that this is common sense, that the vast majority of clean cops have as much to gain by ridding the force of the bad ones as the rest of society does.

But it never seems to pan out that way in practice does it? The standard response by police forces everywhere to criticism is to close ranks, there seems to be a culture of denial, whistleblowers get treated like dirt and are forced out in ignominy. The prevailing impression is that many police resent being made accountable to the public they are supposed to serve and protect.

_____________________________



(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: hung Jury - 12/18/2015 10:11:25 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

I don't know if I am a cynic, but is the prosecutor trying to appease the masses and possibly aiming for a political career, hence going way overboard?

It looks that way.
Which is not to say that none of the cops did anything wrong.
They failed to follow procedure, it requires them to put prisoners in seat belts.
It certainly seems that the officers in the van were at least negligent. I think to the point of criminality. But other than playing to the mob I can see no reason for charging everyone who got near the van.


By going overboard they are actually harming the case, it's actually stupid unless there is something going on in the background to give the guilty parties as little legal punishment as possible by deliberately effing up, which could be another angle, while appearing to be all gung ho about the case...

I think it might be pretty hard to find evidence that they wanted to deliberately hurt or harm the prisoner unless they'd admit to it, but he got harmed while being in their custody and due to their "neglect", I think that should be serious enough to throw the book at them.

Yes, police misconduct, criminal negligence, quite likely even negligent homocide. But they are going overboard and can blow the whole thing. We don't need another Garner case.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 32
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: hung Jury Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109