DarkSteven -> RE: CS Profiles and Personal Ads (1/5/2016 8:24:10 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact This is not going to be my prettiest post of the day. I hope folks will make some allowances for me on this one. I don't read a whole lot of profiles. More often than not, the only thing that's going to get me to read a person's profile around here is if I'm looking for extra info in relation to a thread the someone writes. My personal opinion is that a significant percentage of what is on the 'personals' side of this site is crap and I often feel bad for those who try to use it as an effective means of finding people. However, I see enough of what is being spoken of in the OP under that dang "Looking for Naughty Love" section. I try to stay out of it because a bunch of it is often what is described in the original. The only concession that I have about that section is somebody must have thought it was a good idea in the hopes of getting people's personal ads out of the discussion forums and I have to say at least it does that more than what the place had without it. As far as "ask me about it" or "looking for sub female" and the usual tripe where people say "email me if interested," I think that falls into a few categories. (Have to say it.) Males, this isn't going to work for you! A random, nothing, blip on the screen isn't going to get women sending you email. It's boring and unimaginative in a venue where you are competing against some males who write very well. (Don't like the word, competing? Too bad. You are competing with other males whether you like it or not.) Females, on the other hand, can pull off this lack of effort because males will flock to them, anyway. They will still get flooded with emails no matter what they do. I'm not saying they are all quality emails but the mailbox will be full. Another angle to consider is that I do believe your friend is right in some cases, Oside. It's very similar to the concepts of cold reading, where there's enough open territory that the option to fill in the blanks presents itself, and the person fishing for a positive reaction can make it seem like there's a connection. Whether the goal is money, sex, or another positive benefit, they've got the other person hooked quickly and it makes it easy to manipulate the situation. I never understood how men try to converse online, on this site and others. 90+% of them will start a conversation with either something horribly bland ("How are you today?") or try to negotiate a relationship right up front ("So what are you looking for?") The only reason I would message a woman here is if I saw something I liked or that intrigued me in her profile. And the initial message will ask a question or make a comment on her pic. I've asked why someone had so many pics of hummingbirds in her profile, what the birds meant to her, for example. Conversation really isn't hard. But it DOES take some effort. And expecting a woman to carry the conversation when she's under malemessage bombardment, is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|