RE: Freedom From Atheism! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


WilliamWizer -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/15/2016 5:39:35 PM)

quote:

PeonForHer

It's all very vague and loose stuff for me, R0. Things I've picked up from natural history, psychology ... I'm nobody's idea of an expert in any of this.

Anyway, the idea runs like this: other people, even things, around oneself, begin to feel as though they're part of one's own body. Thus, for instance, the driver of a car will *wince* if he's scraped the side of it on a bollard - just like he'd scraped his own body. The same's true with other people - but only so long as you feel that the 'other people' concerned are in some way 'part of you'. Your wife - your children - easy to grasp: You see your partner or your kid cut his arm, you *wince* - just as though it's your own arm. I'm wondering if that same sense runs true, albeit to a weaker degree, to humanity as a whole.


I half agree. while it's true that I, more or less, feel the pain of those that are dear to me (even if they aren't living beings) the same isn't true for others. I may feel sad when a major incident harms or kills dozens/hundreds/thousands of people but it lasts only a few seconds until I stop caring completely.

quote:

PeonForHer

i've heard that the most basic moral maxim of all is 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you' - and that there's some equivalent to this in all the major religions. Assume that's the case. But if I'm right about that sense of 'that other person's body is part of mine' ... then you'd never even need the religious maxim. By sheer instinct, you'd assume that you'd not do to someone what would harm yourself - because that other person *is a part of yourself*.



if I had to believe on that moral maxim I would start by more or less reversing it. do to others what they did to you. and sincerely... I'm far more charitable and merciful than what others were to me.

quote:

PeonForHer

I remember reading once about Mother Theresa of Calcutta - that she couldn't read of any hurt to anyone at all, anywhere, without wincing. If that's true - then it's this, whatever it is, that I guess would be humanity's salvation. Empathy - you feel what others feel, because *all* others are a part of you. The psychopath has none of that; the saint has it to the nth degree.

Anyway, that's the hypothesis. As I said: I don't fecken know. Just a collection of notions.



if all others are part of me why in the seven hell I'm not part of them too? I won't say Mother Theresa is wrong. I'm sure everybody around her loved her and helped her always but that's far from my case so my reaction is far from being the same.

yes. I know I'm not a nice person but if all I got from others is poison can you complain if what I give in return is also poisonous?




thompsonx -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/15/2016 7:36:44 PM)


ORIGINAL: WilliamWizer

I know I'm not a nice person but if all I got from others is poison can you complain if what I give in return is also poisonous?

I think the word for that is revenge.




Kirata -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/15/2016 9:34:48 PM)



quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Your entire position is based on the premise that when a choice has a moral component it is inherently a "religious" choice. I suppose one might adopt that view as a philosophical stance. But you are treating it as the certified gold fact from which all your arguments logically follow. I'll grant they are logical, but garbage in garbage out.

Speaking of religion shall we talk about what the gubblemint does? lol get my drift?

I'll be, K never came back to justify that nasty comment. Getting a little deep for ya man? [8D]

Yeah, more than a little. Get my drift?

K.




WilliamWizer -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/16/2016 12:42:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: WilliamWizer

I know I'm not a nice person but if all I got from others is poison can you complain if what I give in return is also poisonous?

I think the word for that is revenge.


I disagree. it would be revenge if I were returning the poison only to those that poisoned me.

in my case is more like a contagious disease that I got, more or less, cured but can still spread and I don't care who gets infected unless they are in a short list you could call "those I feel deserve to be saved" which get the required treatment (or even a cure if possible) from me.




Lucylastic -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/16/2016 1:29:33 AM)

ugh




Real0ne -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/19/2016 5:41:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

I;d be interested in hearing what you mean by 'social sense' since there are many ways to interpret that? Family? The World?


It's all very vague and loose stuff for me, R0. Things I've picked up from natural history, psychology ... I'm nobody's idea of an expert in any of this.

Anyway, the idea runs like this: other people, even things, around oneself, begin to feel as though they're part of one's own body. Thus, for instance, the driver of a car will *wince* if he's scraped the side of it on a bollard - just like he'd scraped his own body. The same's true with other people - but only so long as you feel that the 'other people' concerned are in some way 'part of you'. Your wife - your children - easy to grasp: You see your partner or your kid cut his arm, you *wince* - just as though it's your own arm. I'm wondering if that same sense runs true, albeit to a weaker degree, to humanity as a whole.

i've heard that the most basic moral maxim of all is 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you' - and that there's some equivalent to this in all the major religions. Assume that's the case. But if I'm right about that sense of 'that other person's body is part of mine' ... then you'd never even need the religious maxim. By sheer instinct, you'd assume that you'd not do to someone what would harm yourself - because that other person *is a part of yourself*.

Re all that - a practical example. As a kid of 13 or so, I got into a fight with another kid. I punched his nose and it bled profusely. The kid burst into tears. Me, I knew what it was like to be hit in the nose and to burst into tears. His nose 'was my nose'; his tears 'were my tears'. To this day I still wince at the memory of that.

In short, you can't go around hurting your own body.

Me - my brothers and sisters, if they're hurt, I'll wince with their hurt - they're 'part of me'. Not so much as my mother would, no doubt - but it's there. Same with close friends. I'll wince also when I watch a film and see a likeable character hurt. But some people - the baddies in films - if they get hurt, I don't care. They are not part of me. They're 'other'.

I remember reading once about Mother Theresa of Calcutta - that she couldn't read of any hurt to anyone at all, anywhere, without wincing. If that's true - then it's this, whatever it is, that I guess would be humanity's salvation. Empathy - you feel what others feel, because *all* others are a part of you. The psychopath has none of that; the saint has it to the nth degree.

Anyway, that's the hypothesis. As I said: I don't fecken know. Just a collection of notions.






Well you have identified a sort of empathic self induced connection to inanimate objects sounds like to me. Say sking for instance the skis definitiony become part of or an extension of your body, if they dont you roll down the hill. Empathy is actully a projection usually resulting from somethingn that you are sensitive to in how you see yourself and relate to the world around you rather than some power causing you to feel some way.

In any event you govern yourself according to your own moral base and that is your religion, whatever the elements are that make up your moral compass.






Real0ne -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/19/2016 5:48:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata



quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Your entire position is based on the premise that when a choice has a moral component it is inherently a "religious" choice. I suppose one might adopt that view as a philosophical stance. But you are treating it as the certified gold fact from which all your arguments logically follow. I'll grant they are logical, but garbage in garbage out.

Speaking of religion shall we talk about what the gubblemint does? lol get my drift?

I'll be, K never came back to justify that nasty comment. Getting a little deep for ya man? [8D]

Yeah, more than a little. Get my drift?

K.



Nah you dont get off the hook that easily because I much more than simply 'get your drift'....[8|]

You literally just confessed you are in over your head to anyone who recognises that I am merely quoting some of the positions of well known highly accredited philosophers. Its not too late ya know, but personally I think you would be trying merely to defend the indefensible imo. Never know sometimes you come up with pretty good points




mnottertail -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/19/2016 5:55:40 PM)

well known highly accredited philosiphers.........aint that like saying 2 dollar dick suckers?

this is not a credible cite in any aeon.




Real0ne -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 9:43:21 AM)

well much of the US legal system was built around them and continues (at least in the supreme court) to be highly influential. I'd say they have gained a great deal of respect through out the community of 'rational' people.

That is why I was interested in hearing what K had to defend what is becoming clear is nothing more than a drive by 'groundless snark' in part 2 of his post since he seems incapable of even defining the premise much less defending it. Part one he got right.




crazyml -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 10:59:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata



quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Your entire position is based on the premise that when a choice has a moral component it is inherently a "religious" choice. I suppose one might adopt that view as a philosophical stance. But you are treating it as the certified gold fact from which all your arguments logically follow. I'll grant they are logical, but garbage in garbage out.

Speaking of religion shall we talk about what the gubblemint does? lol get my drift?

I'll be, K never came back to justify that nasty comment. Getting a little deep for ya man? [8D]

Yeah, more than a little. Get my drift?

K.



Nah you dont get off the hook that easily because I much more than simply 'get your drift'....[8|]

You literally just confessed you are in over your head to anyone who recognises that I am merely quoting some of the positions of well known highly accredited philosophers. Its not too late ya know, but personally I think you would be trying merely to defend the indefensible imo. Never know sometimes you come up with pretty good points

Parroting things that philosophers have said without actually understanding is what has got you into this absurd mess.

You have manifestly failed to make the "govt as atheist" argument... you now just look like a drooling idiot.




thompsonx -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 1:02:40 PM)


ORIGINAL: WilliamWizer


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: WilliamWizer

I know I'm not a nice person but if all I got from others is poison can you complain if what I give in return is also poisonous?

I think the word for that is revenge.


I disagree. it would be revenge if I were returning the poison only to those that poisoned me.

To those of us for whom engilsh is their native language, that is exactly what you said. If you wish to modify your statement that is your choice...oh wait that is what you just did. No need to thank me for the grammar lesson.




PeonForHer -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 5:05:28 PM)

quote:

In any event you govern yourself according to your own moral base and that is your religion, whatever the elements are that make up your moral compass.



That stretches the general notion of what a religion is usually taken to be, I'd have thought.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 5:12:46 PM)

He has been stretching the definition of religion from the get go.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 5:15:39 PM)

quote:

I am merely quoting some of the positions of well known highly accredited philosophers.

Accredited by ?




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 5:30:14 PM)

him




thompsonx -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 5:35:41 PM)


ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

him


And his imaginary friend




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 5:37:56 PM)

the squirrels running around inside his head you mean ? Related to Trump then ?




Real0ne -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 11:00:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

He has been stretching the definition of religion from the get go.



Do you know what metaphysics is?

If you do know what it is can anything that is the product of metaphysics be believed?






Real0ne -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/20/2016 11:05:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

the squirrels running around inside his head you mean ? Related to Trump then ?



I cant imagine that the asshelmet you quoted who I have on hide incidentally could possibly have anything worthwile to contribute to this thread because, well, because its an asshelmet thats several cards short of a full deck and this is lightyears above its head. BTW, didnt you wind up with your ass handed to you earlier in the thread?




Kirata -> RE: Freedom From Atheism! (3/21/2016 12:35:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

the squirrels running around inside his head you mean ? Related to Trump then ?

I cant imagine that the asshelmet you quoted who I have on hide incidentally could possibly have anything worthwile to contribute to this thread because, well, because its an asshelmet thats several cards short of a full deck and this is lightyears above its head. BTW, didnt you wind up with your ass handed to you earlier in the thread?

There is of course the minor detail that Dvr22999874 didn't quote anyone.

K.





Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125