Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/13/2016 9:01:48 AM   
mousekabob


Posts: 187
Status: offline
Kaliko's relationship is exactly like ours. I can tell him I don't like something...he decides what to do from that. Doesn't mean I will like his decision. I sometimes absolutely hate it. There are times, like Kaliko, I look at hime and wonder..."really? REALLY??". lol

And sure we still get into arguments from time to time. I huff and puff and that's about all that happens.

_____________________________

aka littlewonder
------------------------
Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/13/2016 10:51:05 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
Nobody has to renegotiate but they do have to accept consequences.

You can want to do orgasm denial all you want, but if she no longer finds you attractive, then there's nothing to deny.

That's what most of these guys don't realize, that the greater the rights, the greater the responsibility. That you don't get it both ways.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/13/2016 11:36:40 AM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: shiftyw

it frightens me that a Dom would have their bluff called on them by the sub and they would want them back after a digression was made so large that they considered ending the relationship. Or the idea that a sub might feel some obligation to return to what I would consider a dangerous relationship with someone who considers their kink or whatever it was you didn't want to do so badly that you ended things, above your feelings.



I don't think I can answer your questions. Michael didn't bluff. You wrote that you walk if you want a baby and the dom doesn't. I see that exactly as "My Way or the Highway".

On bringing back a sub who doesn't want to return.. that's the piece of land that runs right next to the "Highway".. just up the road from the Police station and a kidnap charge. Highways are better than prison cells.. almost always. (Note that I said 'almost'.. I still have this 'thing' about body cavity searches and prison porn with which to contend.) ;)

CnC doesn't work for everyone and I don't entirely understand the negotiation process I guess. Dom A shows me the path 'he' chooses. I love it, follow it into bliss forever. Dom B shows me a path that I abhore.. what's is there to 'talk' about much less negotiate unless you want Dom B to do things 'your' way in which case.. might as well wear the domsuit yerself.

I just don't get it.



_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to shiftyw)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/14/2016 12:53:10 AM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

I look at him and wonder..."really? REALLY??"

Looks around for the nearest belt...
...really? REALLY?

_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/14/2016 12:56:25 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
You know you've written a good thread when the chainsaws come out.

I can't speak for anybody else. There are some things that are not up for "renegotiation" in life. We all have them. One of mine (good example) is that I *never* want to have another child of my own. I don't care how much you "communicate" your desire to have one with me. My off-spring are grown, I don't want to raise yours, and it's not up for debate. This is something you should know upon entering a relationship with me and if you don't, you're deluded. On this matter, I will, absolutely, show you the door.

quote:

ORIGINAL: littleladybug
If someone feels that they cannot leave, that's their prerogative.

Are you sure? Have you thought the whole thing through? So, if a person "feels" that way, their basic human rights no longer exist?

Could you leave tomorrow if you wanted to? Should the law not protect you?


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/14/2016 8:17:23 AM   
littleladybug


Posts: 1082
Joined: 5/30/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact



quote:

ORIGINAL: littleladybug
If someone feels that they cannot leave, that's their prerogative.

Are you sure? Have you thought the whole thing through? So, if a person "feels" that way, their basic human rights no longer exist?

Could you leave tomorrow if you wanted to? Should the law not protect you?
[/color]


Yup, pretty sure. I've "thought the whole thing through" to the extent that I respect that that's the way they feel. Not my circus, not my monkeys. If someone wants to be in such a relationship, that is their choice. Who is anyone to argue against it? If we are speaking about competent, consenting adults, where is the line drawn? Why is it ok on one hand to beat someone else bloody, yet not to "allow" them to leave on the other? I don't know of many places where one can legally consent to physical battery (aside from sanctioned boxing, MMA and the like). Why not the same outcry for that? Certainly that would be a situation that would be very ripe for abuse? Shouldn't the law protect those people too? Or, maybe it's just a YKINMK situation?

Sure, I could leave. My own relationship has as its foundation certain mutual understandings. If one of those things should change, it could very well lead to our relationship dissolving if we cannot come to a new agreement about them.



(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/14/2016 8:40:30 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
Off topic.

I was watching something not long ago about MMA and how they really do have the most participants who have been convicted of domestic violence charges. Michael Vick got more news coverage for dog fighting than all of the press regarding members of the MMA for assaulting their partners COMBINED.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to littleladybug)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/14/2016 3:27:47 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
If the law should protect you here then should it not protect you from impact play also? What about owning too màny sex toys? There are states where that's strictly regulated. When should the law interfere in a relationship where both parties agreed as to what they will or won't do?

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/14/2016 4:03:34 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP
If the law should protect you here then should it not protect you from impact play also? What about owning too màny sex toys? There are states where that's strictly regulated. When should the law interfere in a relationship where both parties agreed as to what they will or won't do?

Tell me why it doesn't?

If I'm beating you, even with your consent, and a member of LEO witnesses it, I'm going to jail. Depending on what I'm beating you with will determine the charge. It better not be something I could kill you with, cause if it is, I'm going up for a long time. I *might* get a cop who understands consensual vrs non consensual play. If I don't, I'm on God's good humor.

It's one of the questions I ask myself constantly. How do we find that balance, in law, where we do TTTWD with consent, while still carry through the laws we have on the books to protect people? We're not *just* a kink community. We are also a part of a greater community. The same society where people were ending up dead because vanilla people were beating the sh^t out of each other non-con sensually.

I've actually lived in places where you couldn't buy a sex toy within the city limits. Sounds dumb, but I really did cross a state line to buy my first strap on.



_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/15/2016 4:19:25 AM   
longwayhome


Posts: 1035
Joined: 1/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP
If the law should protect you here then should it not protect you from impact play also? What about owning too màny sex toys? There are states where that's strictly regulated. When should the law interfere in a relationship where both parties agreed as to what they will or won't do?

Tell me why it doesn't?

If I'm beating you, even with your consent, and a member of LEO witnesses it, I'm going to jail. Depending on what I'm beating you with will determine the charge. It better not be something I could kill you with, cause if it is, I'm going up for a long time. I *might* get a cop who understands consensual vrs non consensual play. If I don't, I'm on God's good humor.

It's one of the questions I ask myself constantly. How do we find that balance, in law, where we do TTTWD with consent, while still carry through the laws we have on the books to protect people? We're not *just* a kink community. We are also a part of a greater community. The same society where people were ending up dead because vanilla people were beating the sh^t out of each other non-con sensually.

I've actually lived in places where you couldn't buy a sex toy within the city limits. Sounds dumb, but I really did cross a state line to buy my first strap on.




Unfortunately we all have to live with the fact that things that we do or consent to can put an end to our freedom or livelihoods should someone choose to present them in a certain light.

At their most enlightened (which isn't often) the UK courts have taken account of the general nature of a relationship moderated by a collaring contract, and only found against people for committing certain acts at certain times, rather than regarding every potentially chargeable action as assault. The point is however that the defendants have not come out of such cases without being convicted of a crime.

As for the police, we have a number of cases where police have taken the opportunity to scour through someone's computer after obtaining it for a completely unrelated investigation, and found BDSM images where someone "appears" to be being actively abused (who would have thought it!). These cases have been prosecuted with the full force of the law.

Consent is therefore a moral and not a legal defence, which as pointed out above sadly does little to prevent genuine non-consensual domestic abuse.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/15/2016 4:49:42 AM   
longwayhome


Posts: 1035
Joined: 1/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

I personally don't engage in consensual non-consent relationships of the type LP laid out in the OP (once you consent you're not allowed to revoke consent or leave).

However, I do engage in CnC play.

In this type of play, I negotiate that, for the duration of play, I consent, and that any withdraw of consent is invalid, and can be ignored by the Top.
In this type of play, limits, and the duration of the play is heavily negotiated, and I only engage in it with people whom I implicitly trust (to not pull out chainsaws).

The times where I've actually engaged in it are rare, especially considering how risky it is for the Top in question. It's essential that they can fully trust me to stand by my word that I really do want this, and that if the shit hits the fan, and they miscalculate, and we hit a serious issue, I'm not going to accuse them of being some horrible abuser later for making a mistake, and instead we'll get through it together without involving third parties.

The reason I engage engaging in this type of play is because I'm physically incapable of enduring some of the harder type play that I love to do, without me hitting the point where -in the moment- I feel like I can't take it anymore, and attempt to make them stop, including using safewords. While if they do stop, it always results in disappointment later.

Agreeing to CnC for a heavily negotiated play session allows me the freedom to not hold back my natural responses, even if those natural responses are attempting to get them to stop with every fiber of my being.

Pushing myself past the boundaries of what I feel I can take, and what I can maintain a full consent to in the moment, has actually helped me to get to be able to enjoy some types of play now without CnC agreements, where before, I couldn't get past the pain and panic long enough to find out "I'm really okay doing this, even if it's scary and it hurts".

Anal is a big example (huge trigger for me). For the most part, I really want to enjoy it, but every single time, initially it hurts enough that it drives me to a panic that I used to be absolutely unable to push past without safewording. Giving certain people the blank permission of: "I want you to do this, and I want you to not stop until you cum, regardless of what I say and do, including safewords", has given me the opportunity to not only find out that, after I get past the initial panic and pain, and finally 'give in' and start to relax, I really enjoy it, but it's also allowed me to be able to control my feelings enough in certain circumstances so that I can get to the point of relaxing without panicking and safewording.

CnC is something that I use to explore the boundaries of what I'm physically capable of, past the point of what I feel -in the moment- I'm physically capable of.



The above describes much of what I feel about the type of heavily negotiated play, which I cannot safe-word out of, by prior agreement. Some people are very blasé about "no holds barred" sessions and even boast about them, but I thought that UllrsIshtar's post explains exactly what non-abusive CnC can look like.

Such edgy play can be really scary and exciting at the same time (as well as leaving you physically and emotionally drained), but it is only something you can safely do with someone who, whilst being turned on by "hurting" you, also respects you hugely and wants the best for you.

The descriptions some people give about extreme micro-management, having no right to make any major life decisions for yourself and not being allowed to leave, make me concerned, although I know that may be what some people want. I always feel personally uncomfortable with the possibility that an abused person is eventually unable psychologically to leave even if there is a theoretical physical possibility. The age old issue about when extreme power exchange ends and abuse begins is a complex one.

For a similar reason I would never want to be with anyone who didn't care for or respect me (and vice versa), no matter what the dynamic was in the relationship or whether I was regularly beaten. For me CnC play is only possible against that background of trust and concern for another's well-being.

In the right circumstances, it can blow your mind.

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/15/2016 5:35:24 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
But what this comes down to in reality is whether or not you're a self aware, healthy person with clearly expressed boundaries who picked another self aware, healthy person with clearly expressed boundaries who took the time to make sure they were compatible.

Without that, things are a lot more likely to go wrong. With them, it's doubtful.

By doing this, there's no risk of abuse, because you didn't pick an abuser and you made it clear what would make you feel abused and he didn't need that.

As always, what this boils down to is not picking an ass for a partner.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to longwayhome)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/16/2016 2:27:04 AM   
crumpets


Posts: 1614
Joined: 11/5/2014
From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP
If the law should protect you here then should it not protect you from impact play also? What about owning too màny sex toys? There are states where that's strictly regulated. When should the law interfere in a relationship where both parties agreed as to what they will or won't do?


People v. Jovanovic (New York, 1996) notwithstanding, California has People v. Samuels (1967), which has never been overturned to my knowledge, where Mr. Samuels, a prominent Sunnyvale Opthamologist, was tried for aggravated assault (among other charges) for whipping (and filming) two naked bound fully consenting men, where "welts and bruises were visible on both men's bodies".

Samuals was convicted of aggravated assault, even though ALL the men clearly entered the agreement of their own free will.

The appellate court dealt solely with the question of whether Samuels's acts of consensual sadism constituted criminal aggravated assault.
  • Was the assault in question consensual? (And if so, does it matter?)
  • Are consensual sadomasochistic acts illegal?

    The court ruled that consent does not matter; the sadistic acts were illegal regardless of whether the masochistic men consented to them.
    In fact, the court ruled that "normal, sane people do not consent to having themselves whipped and beaten".
    The insane cannot legally grant consent. Ergo, there was no consent.

    Catch 22!
    The act of granting consent to be assaulted was proof that you lacked the sanity to grant consent to be assaulted.

    (in reply to DesFIP)
  • Profile   Post #: 53
    Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
    All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
    Jump to:





    New Messages No New Messages
    Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
    Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
     Post New Thread
     Reply to Message
     Post New Poll
     Submit Vote
     Delete My Own Post
     Delete My Own Thread
     Rate Posts




    Collarchat.com © 2025
    Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

    0.078