longwayhome -> RE: What is INFORMED consent? (2/15/2016 3:59:27 AM)
|
Big complicated question - if only because people have such different ideas about it in practice, and that can lead to life/death, prison cell/freedom, serious damage/extreme ecstasy, relationship-ender/happily-ever-after sorts of issues. I think I know what I mean by informed consent and it includes understanding competence, how someone will react, how you really say no if necessary (safe words/signals etc.), how much someone can take and an understanding of someone's underlying values. As a result for me, if consent is to be totally meaningful, the only way of avoiding over-scripting and a complete lack of spontaneity, is knowing your play partner very well, which in itself informs the choices I make about relationships and play. The problem is that we all know, however sensitive, smart or experienced we are, that there are practical problems to overcome, and things go wrong. Things like general consent being too general (e.g. doing what you think the other person likes), areas where competence outweighs actual consent (safe word or signals being less valuable than knowing what you are doing for serious breath play), things you both think are okay and then discover they are not, complete misjudging of risks on the part of one or both parties, consenting to the act but not the consequences, and doing things that are too complex or too risky far too early, before you really understand what consent means to both of you. My greatest fear is being in a situation where, despite best efforts, another person and I completely misunderstand what we mean and ending up in a situation where someone gets hurt (in a way neither of you intended). Despite this fear I do enjoy play which is edgy and strays into the possibility of pushing on past my safe word. That is a complex form of consent and not something I am ever doing with someone I don't trust hugely. I enjoy being alive and in one piece too much. In terms of the example LP gave about the wax, the two issues for me would be competence and general risk. Pain without permanent damage is not a limit for me. If I knew LP was competent, I would live with the general risk because it is not life threatening, and would not blame her if something went wrong despite her best efforts. For me however that would either involve watching LP with someone else, or building up over a few sessions. In other words for the consent to be informed, unless I knew LP very well, I would need some evidence other than her assurances. Very safe, but hardly spontaneous.
|
|
|
|