RE: Peadophilia (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

Curmudgeonly1 -> RE: Peadophilia (2/21/2016 6:36:25 PM)

Then we can rule out 'theory' which by definition has at least some evidence to support it.

We can probably ditch 'hypothesis' as well since there doesn't seem to be a clearly stated question that would lend itself to rigorous, scientific investigation.

[sm=skiprope.gif]



DocStrange -> RE: Peadophilia (2/21/2016 6:42:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thorneyone

Peadophilia is not age play granted, but some people suggested to me that age play was paedophila.
What is a TOS violation and what do you mean by "Post reported"?


Peadophila is not age play. There is no gray area. It deals with children. This site has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to minors and peadophiles.

The definition of Peadophila is:
Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger.[1][2] As a medical diagnosis, specific criteria for the disorder extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[1] A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years of age, but adolescents must be at least five years older than the prepubescent child for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.[1][2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

TOS is Terms of Service - that you agree to when posting in the forms. The link is located at the bottom of the main page:
Section 5.2 of the TOS states the following:
5.2. WE HAVE A ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND A ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY REGARDING PEDOPHILES, PEDERASTS OR ANY PEDOPHILIC, PEDERASTIC, OR SIMILAR RELATED ACTIVITY.

5.2.1. All depictions of all persons on Our Website are of persons over the age of eighteen (18) as of the date of the production of the depiction. We take great measures to ensure that no underage models appear in any of Our materials.

5.2.2. If You seek any form of child pornography (including so-called "virtual" child pornography), You must exit this Website immediately. We do not provide this kind of material and We do not tolerate those who provide this kind of material nor do we tolerate consumers of this kind of material.

5.2.3. In order to further Our zero-tolerance policy, You agree to report any images which You have reason to believe depict minors on Our Website by clicking the 'Support' link at the bottom of this page.

5.2.4. Include with Your report any appropriate evidence, including the date and time of identification. All reports will be investigated and the appropriate action will be taken based upon Our reasonable ability to verify the evidence provided.

5.2.5. We enthusiastically cooperate with any law-enforcement agency investigating child pornography. If You suspect other outside websites are participating in unlawful activities involving minors, please report them to http://www.asacp.org.


Edited to Add:
Reported
At the bottom of each post you will see a "Report" link in the lower right corner of the post next to the post #. This allows people to report posts that violates the TOS. At that point it goes to the Moderators who will review it and pull or correct the post as needed.







stef -> RE: Peadophilia (2/21/2016 6:48:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thorneyone

Peadophilia is not age play granted, but some people suggested to me that age play was paedophila.

Some people ae fucking idiots. Why do you care what fucking idiots think?

quote:

What is a TOS violation and what do you mean by "Post reported"?

It means he's a wannabe hall monitor. Contrary to his thoughts, asking why people equate age play with pedophlia is not a TOS violation and I think he should add more bran to his diet.



Curmudgeonly1 -> RE: Peadophilia (2/21/2016 7:17:36 PM)

[sm=rofl.gif]

"Collarchat.com is a member of the Free Speech Coalition"

[sm=skiprope.gif]



DocStrange -> RE: Peadophilia (2/21/2016 7:30:07 PM)

Just to clarify - I do not want to be a hall monitor. I would probably ban half the people if I were.
And you are right, I definitely need more bran in my diet.



stef -> RE: Peadophilia (2/21/2016 7:30:08 PM)

Why is that so amusing?



Curmudgeonly1 -> RE: Peadophilia (2/21/2016 7:40:36 PM)

1/ "...needs more bran..."

2/ The hypocrisy of the people (including moderators) who participate in a forum that is a member of the "Free Speech Coalition" yet work to curtail the right of any who disagree with them from speaking freely.

If I didn't larf I'd cry.

[sm=skiprope.gif]



Curmudgeonly1 -> RE: Peadophilia (2/21/2016 7:50:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DocStrange

Just to clarify - I do not want to be a hall monitor.


Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

[sm=skiprope.gif]




vincentML -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 3:29:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mousekabob


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curmudgeonly1

Is it a theory?

Or perhaps an hypothesis?

Or maybe mindless, knee jerk redneck reactionism like the "Ooh, ooh, you're a bad person, I'ma reporting you to SIR an' he's gonna whack yer peepee" post up ^thataway^ ?

MKIOK,YKINOK.

[sm=skiprope.gif]


Not enough evidence to state any one way.

Then maybe you are just making shit up????



Cinnamongirl67 -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 5:06:54 AM)

Curmudgeonly1

I have no idea whether your peepee should be whacked but I have to admit that forever skipping emoticon on your signature, aggravates the hell out of me![sm=hissyfit.gif]

But back to the topic of age play. So I can't dress up like a catholic school girl on occasion? Which I don't cause I don't have the outfit.lol.
I think if I want to I can, and it would be fun. Thoughts of a do gooder.



Curmudgeonly1 -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 6:14:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Cinnamongirl67
But back to the topic of age play. So I can't dress up like a catholic school girl on occasion?


Trust me on this, girl. You can most assuredly dress up in a catholic schoolgirl uniform at any and every opportunity. Indeed, it's damn near compulsory.

And if anyone says otherwise just bring the weasel round to mine. He'll be weasely distinguishable. Whereas you'll be stoatally different.

[sm=alien.gif]



Cinnamongirl67 -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 7:34:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curmudgeonly1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Cinnamongirl67
But back to the topic of age play. So I can't dress up like a catholic school girl on occasion?


Trust me on this, girl. You can most assuredly dress up in a catholic schoolgirl uniform at any and every opportunity. Indeed, it's damn near compulsory.

And if anyone says otherwise just bring the weasel round to mine. He'll be weasely distinguishable. Whereas you'll be stoatally different.

[sm=alien.gif]


Oh goodie! Then I am not nuts.
Boing boing boing... Now an alien...lol. Alrighty then. Skipping to boing. Funny!



thishereboi -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 8:41:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thorneyone

Peadophilia is not age play granted, but some people suggested to me that age play was paedophila.
What is a TOS violation and what do you mean by "Post reported"?


Some people think it is, I don't. Just depends on who you talk to.



thishereboi -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 8:46:33 AM)




Well in that case I guess it's a good thing this thread is about age play and not paedophila isn't it? [8|]



HoneyBears -> RE: Is Age Play Immoral? (2/22/2016 9:03:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thorneyone

Help please!!
I got involved in a row, trying to defend Age play and regression from a sympathetic viewpoint and was rounded on with the suggestion that the dynamic is immoral and a possible outlet for illegal impulses.
Where does the community stand on such?

Then a topic title do-over is in order.

OP, there are a bunch of kinks and fetishes which will elicit a squick response. You should not have to defend Age play between two consenting adults any more than a host of other activities between two people.

If these same folks have no issue with a Master/slave relationship dynamic, then who are they to judge?

After all, isn't the concept of slavery immoral? Isn't the practice of slavery illegal?
How does the practice of a pretend-slavery lifestyle differ in having higher moral ground than other forms of role play?
(Are not these the same folks who will insist that M/s is NOT role play to them--LOL!)

It does not. Tell them to put THAT in their pipe and smoke it.

-- Lisa & Cub



thorneyone -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 10:03:15 AM)

Since I seldom venture on to these pages, would someone explain what TOS is please.



vincentML -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 10:08:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thorneyone

Since I seldom venture on to these pages, would someone explain what TOS is please.

TERMS OF SERVICE which bind you when you partake of this board.



Wayward5oul -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 4:20:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: thorneyone

Since I seldom venture on to these pages, would someone explain what TOS is please.

TERMS OF SERVICE which bind you when you partake of this board.


You know, that little box that we all mindlessly click when we are joining a new site, then get upset if we get modded because of something that we agree not to do when we click that little box?



Wayward5oul -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 4:43:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
the first rule of BDSM is not to condemn the kinks of others.


I disagree. I think that we have a responsibility to judge. If there is ever a lifestyle that leaves the field wide open for abusers and genuine scum-of-the-earth perverts to disguise their repulsive actions as 'kink', it is bdsm. If we don't police them, who will?

quote:

I think the OP asked a legitimate question. Might have used a less provocative title however. [:D]


You are right, it is a legitimate question. Ageplay involves consenting adults. Pedophilia does not. People need to understand the difference between the two and make judgments based on that.

I don't condemn age play. I don't necessarily understand it, but if everyone involved is an adult and making informed choices, I don't need to understand it. Hell, I don't understand some of the kinks that I enjoy. But I will participate in them every chance I get, in the pursuit of enlightenment. LOL

Pedophilia, however, I will condemn in a rapid heartbeat. I will shout it from the highest mountain, while holding a sign made of letters bigger than a Ron Jeremy dildo, all lit up like a Vegas wedding chapel.

I may even throw fireworks in. Just for emphasis.



LadyPact -> RE: Peadophilia (2/22/2016 8:06:14 PM)

To answer the original, I don't know if there is a "community" stance on darn near anything. If there is one I would hope it would be that we only engage in activities with adults. Yeah, kind of had to convince people of that when they don't know the difference.

Had it been me, I probably would have told people that if they were really interested in the topic, I'd have recommended a book by the title "Age Play: From Diapers to Diplomas". The book is all about how consenting ADULTS engage in age play. They can either read the information that's available that backs up your standpoint or not. If not, tell them they might be looking for a group called NAMBLA, rather than the majority of us who engage in BDSM. Throw in the line for the South Park fans about how it doesn't stand for the North American Marlo Brando Look A- likes. It will either diffuse the situation with levity or confuse folks that don't understand the South Park reference.

No, the first rule is not to avoid condemning the kinks of others. The first rule is not to condemn the kinks of others with the capacity to consent. That means we deal with adults who can legally make their own decisions.

As explained, ToS stands for Terms of Service. It means you agreed to certain terms to participate here. While I'm on the subject, the 'free speech coalition,' which is really the National Free Speech Coalition, (NFSC) doesn't have crap to do with what people write on message boards. It's a non profit trade association of the adult entertainment industry. It has nothing to do with 'please feel free to be an asshat'.



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375