RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 [5]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts - 3/9/2016 4:11:31 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

I do not understand what that statute might be, exactly going into a polling place and not voting, can you show that to me in the CMRs? Additionally, do you think the camera people, media, government officials, and mass state police will be charged in the conspiracy? I dont think it showed them voting either.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to DominantWrestler)

Profile

Post #: 81

RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts - 3/9/2016 4:24:51 PM

Phydeaux

Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler
I was just stating that the laws in mass encompass a pretty large set of behaviors. Bill broke the law, and it's on film

Does the film show Bill encouraging people to vote for Hillary within 150' of a polling station?

Technically, he's not in the election, so the laws that make it illegal for a candidate to shake hands with strangers doesn't apply.

If there is proof of him asking people to vote for Hillary, then it can be proven he broke the law. Without clear proof, his being there is circumstantial evidence and not likely to hold up in court. I think most of us would agree that his being there was intended to be influential, but absent proof he broke the law, "Slick Willy" will worm out of any trouble.

There are two videos of him soliciting votes. So yes. There is clear proof.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 82

RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts - 3/9/2016 4:59:17 PM

ThatDizzyChick

Posts: 5490
Status: offline

quote:

There are two videos of him soliciting votes.

I haven't seen the videos, is there actual audio of him doing so, or just reports of what he said?

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 83

RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts - 3/9/2016 5:23:18 PM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

There are two videos of him soliciting votes. So yes. There is clear proof.

Well sweetie we are up to page five and you have yet to produce the tapes? Are you lying again?

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 84

RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts - 3/9/2016 5:31:18 PM

BamaD

Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler
I was just stating that the laws in mass encompass a pretty large set of behaviors. Bill broke the law, and it's on film

Does the film show Bill encouraging people to vote for Hillary within 150' of a polling station?

Technically, he's not in the election, so the laws that make it illegal for a candidate to shake hands with strangers doesn't apply.

If there is proof of him asking people to vote for Hillary, then it can be proven he broke the law. Without clear proof, his being there is circumstantial evidence and not likely to hold up in court. I think most of us would agree that his being there was intended to be influential, but absent proof he broke the law, "Slick Willy" will worm out of any trouble.

He isn't a candidate but it is illegal for ANYONE to tell people how to vote inside a polling place or within a certain distance (which varies from one state to another) of the polling place.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 85

RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts - 3/9/2016 5:42:36 PM

BamaD

Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I do not understand what that statute might be, exactly going into a polling place and not voting, can you show that to me in the CMRs? Additionally, do you think the camera people, media, government officials, and mass state police will be charged in the conspiracy? I dont think it showed them voting either.

Did they tell people who to vote for.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 86

RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts - 3/9/2016 5:43:58 PM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD

He isn't a candidate but it is illegal for ANYONE to tell people how to vote inside a polling place or within a certain distance (which varies from one state to another) of the polling place.

We are still waiting for proof that he did.

(in reply to BamaD)

Profile

Post #: 87

RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts - 3/9/2016 7:11:50 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler
I was just stating that the laws in mass encompass a pretty large set of behaviors. Bill broke the law, and it's on film

Does the film show Bill encouraging people to vote for Hillary within 150' of a polling station?

Technically, he's not in the election, so the laws that make it illegal for a candidate to shake hands with strangers doesn't apply.

If there is proof of him asking people to vote for Hillary, then it can be proven he broke the law. Without clear proof, his being there is circumstantial evidence and not likely to hold up in court. I think most of us would agree that his being there was intended to be influential, but absent proof he broke the law, "Slick Willy" will worm out of any trouble.

There are two videos of him soliciting votes. So yes. There is clear proof.

Oh, there is no doubt, and could one be convinced to back that bit of chimera up with those two videos and the statute violated?

Cuz, nobody, and i mean even justin h christ aint seen it.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 88

RE: Clinton violated election laws in Massachusetts - 3/9/2016 7:16:51 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I do not understand what that statute might be, exactly going into a polling place and not voting, can you show that to me in the CMRs? Additionally, do you think the camera people, media, government officials, and mass state police will be charged in the conspiracy? I dont think it showed them voting either.

Did they tell people who to vote for.

We are assured they did, but both you and I who have never much seen eye to eye, have not laid eyes on it, and my impression, which may be wrong is; we both see eye to eye on our not seeing it. And just sort of for the fuck of it would like to actually see it. But you are absolutely without let or hindrance given leave to disagree with that assertion.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to BamaD)

Profile

Post #: 89