quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

I take it from this rant that you do not believe in protecting the environment. Luckily, morons who believe this way are in a minority.

As near as I can tell you invent whatever meaning you want from any post anyway. Ignoring, that I have more than 30 years experience in green companies.
But sure. Knock yourself out.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I happen to agree with you about the issues at the FDA. Bigger than the issues you mentioned in my mind were the hiring of the Monsanto guy.

As for the rest of it- I'm pro clean air; pro environment; anti big government; anti entitlement (corporate or individual).
I'm pro-life; anti deficit financing; anti-gmo.

Anti-H1B's; pro-immigrant (strongy); anti illegal immigrant(strongly). Anti corruption - which means I'm strongly anti union and anti democrat at the moment.

Pro christian; You can do what you want to your body but that doesn't change your sex. Anti political correctness, anti-reparations.

I'd like racism to get cleaned up in sentencing, believe we should reduce the numbers of people in jail by having more choices than jail for criminal offenses.
Pro tort reform. Pro fusion. Pro fission. Anti solar/wind because they are job killers and increase pollution by exporting jobs to china.

I believe that trade bills should be renegotiated; big corporations (and big banks) should be smaller. So should unions.

I believe in profit sharing for employees. And term limits for govt parasites.

quote:


Ignoring, that I have more than 30 years experience in green companies.


Of course you do.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


yeh everyone thinks marconi invented radio


No they do not. Some people think marconi invented the radio.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I happen to agree with you about the issues at the FDA. Bigger than the issues you mentioned in my mind were the hiring of the Monsanto guy.

As for the rest of it- I'm pro clean air; pro environment; anti big government; anti entitlement (corporate or individual).
I'm pro-life; anti deficit financing; anti-gmo.

Anti-H1B's; pro-immigrant (strongy); anti illegal immigrant(strongly). Anti corruption - which means I'm strongly anti union and anti democrat at the moment.

Pro christian; You can do what you want to your body but that doesn't change your sex. Anti political correctness, anti-reparations.

I'd like racism to get cleaned up in sentencing, believe we should reduce the numbers of people in jail by having more choices than jail for criminal offenses.
Pro tort reform. Pro fusion. Pro fission. Anti solar/wind because they are job killers and increase pollution by exporting jobs to china.

I believe that trade bills should be renegotiated; big corporations (and big banks) should be smaller. So should unions.

I believe in profit sharing for employees. And term limits for govt parasites.

One of the difficulties of 4 year administrations and a 6 year term is the short sightedness of the whole deal, something that was bemoaned by more than 1 or 2 of the founding fathers. So, when casting about for administration offices, the simpletonian and expedient view becomes .......gee, who's an expert in the stock market? Joe Kennedy, he raped everyone, he is good, boy....OK, put him in charge of the SEC....ad nauseam. And dealing with that you eventually always get the fox watching the chicken coop, because the president and the legislature, and the judiciary cannot or will not see everything that goes on, the focus is not always everywhere at once.

Phydeaux, I will say that I agree with about half or a little more of your post. there are some things you posted here I am dead set against, but......someday, compromise for reasonable people, with reasonable prescriptions, regardless of the machinery under which these principles operate will again come into vogue.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:


Ignoring, that I have more than 30 years experience in green companies.


Of course you do.

LOL.. because everyone that loves the environment must think like you do, eh?

Or is it just that you're such an idiotic troll that you contest things you have no knowledge of. You get off making post after post, attacking people, adding absolutely nothing to the conversation. You have no facts, no studies; you don't read, you don't cite.

Instead, you imagine vitriol, and imagine somehow this impresses people, or makes you a big shot. Hardly. It makes you a little man, taking cheap shots at people.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I happen to agree with you about the issues at the FDA. Bigger than the issues you mentioned in my mind were the hiring of the Monsanto guy.

As for the rest of it- I'm pro clean air; pro environment; anti big government; anti entitlement (corporate or individual).
I'm pro-life; anti deficit financing; anti-gmo.

Anti-H1B's; pro-immigrant (strongy); anti illegal immigrant(strongly). Anti corruption - which means I'm strongly anti union and anti democrat at the moment.

Pro christian; You can do what you want to your body but that doesn't change your sex. Anti political correctness, anti-reparations.

I'd like racism to get cleaned up in sentencing, believe we should reduce the numbers of people in jail by having more choices than jail for criminal offenses.
Pro tort reform. Pro fusion. Pro fission. Anti solar/wind because they are job killers and increase pollution by exporting jobs to china.

I believe that trade bills should be renegotiated; big corporations (and big banks) should be smaller. So should unions.

I believe in profit sharing for employees. And term limits for govt parasites.

One of the difficulties of 4 year administrations and a 6 year term is the short sightedness of the whole deal, something that was bemoaned by more than 1 or 2 of the founding fathers. So, when casting about for administration offices, the simpletonian and expedient view becomes .......gee, who's an expert in the stock market? Joe Kennedy, he raped everyone, he is good, boy....OK, put him in charge of the SEC....ad nauseam. And dealing with that you eventually always get the fox watching the chicken coop, because the president and the legislature, and the judiciary cannot or will not see everything that goes on, the focus is not always everywhere at once.

Phydeaux, I will say that I agree with about half or a little more of your post. there are some things you posted here I am dead set against, but......someday, compromise for reasonable people, with reasonable prescriptions, regardless of the machinery under which these principles operate will again come into vogue.

I agree with you about the problems of a 4 / 6 year administration. Agree that short term compensation packages skew wall street compensation packages also.

I think current election law serves to protect current office holders and raise the bar against admission, which in turn increases the value of lobbyists. One of my idea of reforms would be giving certain powers to the party that is out of power.

For example - if the democrats were in power - all the inspector generals would be appointed by republicans (or other parties). Perhaps franking privileges would be suspended for incumbents within 3 months of an election; competitors would be funded to the same level by the public as incumbents.

Thank you for a reasonable post mnotter. If I were ever to run for office - it would be on the basis of exactly what you just said. There are enough things that all americans can agree on - to work on those together - and put off the things that we don't agree on till later.

You probably don't agree on my position on global warming - thats fine. But we can both agree that flaring gas needs to be reduced.
You won't agree with my positions on unions -but we can agree that we unions can do a good job training people for vocations - such as electrians, HVAC, carpentry.

Etc.

It is far easiier to demonzie your opponents than it is to build consensus. It would be my hope that in the future you and I can use our brains to find better common solutions. We won't always agree - but for my part, I will try to do so respectfully.

Phy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Just when you think you’ve seen every manifestation of incompetence, corruption and dishonesty that’s possible in a government agency, the Environmental Protection Agency comes up with something new and different. This time it’s violations of federal law by engaging in “covert propaganda” and “grassroots lobbying.”
Government Accountability Office investigators found that the EPA illegally used Thunderclap, a social media site, “to correct what [EPA] viewed as misinformation.” Government use of social media is not unlawful per se; many agencies use it to communicate their actions and policies to the public. But the EPA crossed the line when it asked members of the public to share EPA-composed propaganda on Facebook or Twitter without attributing it to the government.

Are you kidding me?

they were out in droves on every media website site (and still are) planting disinformation about 911 to the functionally retarded america. Despite nists admission of symetrical freefall which can ONLY happen in a demolition America still doesnt get it that it was an inside job. Not only refusing to distribute the model data so we can check it (peer review) but worse its so wrong the result dont remotely match the actual event. Anyone in jail? Oh they got promoted instead!

So now our science and engineering is politicized.

How about the FDA?
Burzinski with his proven cancer cure using antineoplastons, where they restricted his sales severely limited his ability to research and practice, and if that is not bad enough they stole his fucking patents! That right they filed patents right over the top of his under their name!

How about Steven Avery, imprisoned innocent man, the gubblemint guilty as sin, failed to put him away on false charges the first time so they set him up by murdering a gal.

There is no end to the corruption from the beat cop to those unkowns who own the gubblemint!

But RealOne, it's part of American lore now and there will never be a grand jury. It's up to us from now on to battle the neocons every step and for as long as we can until the authors who got their 'new Pearl Harbor' and Plan for a New American Century...all die off. And also disregard all of the prime time and movie media propagating fear of terrorism even if the women are beautiful and smoking hot.

Stop and reverse the militarization of all law enforcement and I understand even some of the generals (younger) are beginning to wise up, and the 4TH Reich will fail to coalesce. (think about that one, if the generals turn on the neocons, then there may be hope) Corruption at that level without the Army...has nothing. Even Caesar had to learn that one...and quick.

Then it will be a slow march back to the country we grew up in but one living in a sort of conservative progressivism.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Commies in 1776???who knew?
Nazis in 1776???whoknew?